Talk:Fastback (G1) - Revision history

Khajidha: /* A random thought */

2010-08-05T19:17:22Z

A random thought

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 5 August 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==A random thought==		==A random thought==
	Why didn't they call him [[Blastification\|Backblast]]? Is it because that actually makes sense? ;-) --[[User:Tribimat\|Tribimat]] 15:15, 5 August 2010 (EDT)		Why didn't they call him [[Blastification\|Backblast]]? Is it because that actually makes sense? ;-) --[[User:Tribimat\|Tribimat]] 15:15, 5 August 2010 (EDT)
			:That wouldn't be blastification. Outback would blastify to Outblast or Blastback. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:17, 5 August 2010 (EDT)

Tribimat: a bit of whimsy

2010-08-05T19:15:11Z

a bit of whimsy

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 5 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
	:Holy cow... That explains Shane McCarthy's determination to destroy the continuity through and through!!!! --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 02:25, 29 October 2009 (EDT)		:Holy cow... That explains Shane McCarthy's determination to destroy the continuity through and through!!!! --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 02:25, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

			==A random thought==
			Why didn't they call him [[Blastification\|Backblast]]? Is it because that actually makes sense? ;-) --[[User:Tribimat\|Tribimat]] 15:15, 5 August 2010 (EDT)

Geewunling: Talk:Fastback moved to Talk:Fastback (G1)

2010-07-20T06:08:21Z

Talk:Fastback moved to Talk:Fastback (G1)

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:08, 20 July 2010
(No difference)

Geewunling: Moving discussion

2009-10-29T06:35:54Z

Moving discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 29 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
	:Holy cow... That explains Shane McCarthy's determination to destroy the continuity through and through!!!! --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 02:25, 29 October 2009 (EDT)		:Holy cow... That explains Shane McCarthy's determination to destroy the continuity through and through!!!! --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 02:25, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

	~~== Category:Mini Vehicles ==~~

	I know he shares a character model with Outback, but I'm not sure he belongs in the Mini Vehicle category. "Mini Vehicle" is kind of a toy-only concept it—doesn't really mean anything in the comics, so I don't think comic-only characters belong. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:13, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

	:Perhaps we should take this to the Mini Vehicle talk page, given this is talk about the definition of 'Mini Vehicle'. My opinion is that whatever shares a mold with the officially designated Minibots (a term, btw, used in fiction in the Marvel comics, so that's one argument against the removal of Wipe-Out from the category at least) can be classified a Minibot, whether they have a toy or not. Much as fiction doesn't do much with the concept, it doesn't completely ignore it either. And also, I'm pretty sure there's no telling whether a Mini Vehicle has to be an AUtobot or not - I'm pretty sure faction never was part of their definition. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:19, 29 October 2009 (EDT)
	::Yes it should be discussed there. Right now Fastback, [[Wipe-Out]], [[Subsea]], and [[Flattop (Autobot)\|Flattop]] are not listed as Mini Vehicles on the Mini Vehicle page. Maybe they should be added. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 02:35, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Category:Mini Vehicles */

2009-10-29T06:35:08Z

Category:Mini Vehicles

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 29 October 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:Perhaps we should take this to the Mini Vehicle talk page, given this is talk about the definition of 'Mini Vehicle'. My opinion is that whatever shares a mold with the officially designated Minibots (a term, btw, used in fiction in the Marvel comics, so that's one argument against the removal of Wipe-Out from the category at least) can be classified a Minibot, whether they have a toy or not. Much as fiction doesn't do much with the concept, it doesn't completely ignore it either. And also, I'm pretty sure there's no telling whether a Mini Vehicle has to be an AUtobot or not - I'm pretty sure faction never was part of their definition. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:19, 29 October 2009 (EDT)		:Perhaps we should take this to the Mini Vehicle talk page, given this is talk about the definition of 'Mini Vehicle'. My opinion is that whatever shares a mold with the officially designated Minibots (a term, btw, used in fiction in the Marvel comics, so that's one argument against the removal of Wipe-Out from the category at least) can be classified a Minibot, whether they have a toy or not. Much as fiction doesn't do much with the concept, it doesn't completely ignore it either. And also, I'm pretty sure there's no telling whether a Mini Vehicle has to be an AUtobot or not - I'm pretty sure faction never was part of their definition. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:19, 29 October 2009 (EDT)
			::Yes it should be discussed there. Right now Fastback, [[Wipe-Out]], [[Subsea]], and [[Flattop (Autobot)\|Flattop]] are not listed as Mini Vehicles on the Mini Vehicle page. Maybe they should be added. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 02:35, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

Detour at 06:25, 29 October 2009

2009-10-29T06:25:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 29 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
			:Holy cow... That explains Shane McCarthy's determination to destroy the continuity through and through!!!! --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 02:25, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

	== Category:Mini Vehicles ==		== Category:Mini Vehicles ==

Geewunling at 06:19, 29 October 2009

2009-10-29T06:19:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:19, 29 October 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I know he shares a character model with Outback, but I'm not sure he belongs in the Mini Vehicle category. "Mini Vehicle" is kind of a toy-only concept it—doesn't really mean anything in the comics, so I don't think comic-only characters belong. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:13, 29 October 2009 (EDT)		I know he shares a character model with Outback, but I'm not sure he belongs in the Mini Vehicle category. "Mini Vehicle" is kind of a toy-only concept it—doesn't really mean anything in the comics, so I don't think comic-only characters belong. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:13, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

			:Perhaps we should take this to the Mini Vehicle talk page, given this is talk about the definition of 'Mini Vehicle'. My opinion is that whatever shares a mold with the officially designated Minibots (a term, btw, used in fiction in the Marvel comics, so that's one argument against the removal of Wipe-Out from the category at least) can be classified a Minibot, whether they have a toy or not. Much as fiction doesn't do much with the concept, it doesn't completely ignore it either. And also, I'm pretty sure there's no telling whether a Mini Vehicle has to be an AUtobot or not - I'm pretty sure faction never was part of their definition. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:19, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Category:Mini Vehicles */ new section

2009-10-29T04:13:38Z

Category:Mini Vehicles: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 29 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

			== Category:Mini Vehicles ==

			I know he shares a character model with Outback, but I'm not sure he belongs in the Mini Vehicle category. "Mini Vehicle" is kind of a toy-only concept it—doesn't really mean anything in the comics, so I don't think comic-only characters belong. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:13, 29 October 2009 (EDT)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-24T12:16:35Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 24 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

FFN: New page: IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --~~~~

2007-10-08T16:33:25Z

New page: IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --~~~~

New page

IDW sure are harsh on the aussie Autobots :( --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 16:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>