Talk:Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers 2010 (franchise) - Revision history

Shadow XGX-9: /* Is this useful? */ new section

2021-07-07T14:21:44Z

Is this useful?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:21, 7 July 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Proposed move ==		== Proposed move ==
	I didn't add the move tag (that was Starfield), but I do agree with the notion of moving this page to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers 2010 (franchise)". Might be a bit unwieldy a name, but it seems to be the official title of the line going by the logo and I think it would go a long way towards avoiding confusion with the untitled US line coming out this year. --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 15:12, 8 June 2010 (EDT)		I didn't add the move tag (that was Starfield), but I do agree with the notion of moving this page to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers 2010 (franchise)". Might be a bit unwieldy a name, but it seems to be the official title of the line going by the logo and I think it would go a long way towards avoiding confusion with the untitled US line coming out this year. --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 15:12, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

			== Is this useful? ==

			https://imgur.com/gallery/6ehAZdP

			Wasn't sure where to put it or if it's duplicated elsewhere or anything.

			[[User:Shadow XGX-9\|Shadow XGX-9]] ([[User talk:Shadow XGX-9\|talk]]) 10:21, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

Starfield: Talk:Transformers 2010 (franchise) moved to Talk:Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers 2010 (franchise): Full name. Plus makes it less confusing with the new toyline.

2010-08-17T15:28:24Z

Talk:Transformers 2010 (franchise) moved to Talk:Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers 2010 (franchise): Full name. Plus makes it less confusing with the new toyline.

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:28, 17 August 2010
(No difference)

Tigerpaw28 at 19:12, 8 June 2010

2010-06-08T19:12:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 8 June 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::Sorry if I was being rude. [[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:10, 16 March 2010 (EDT)		:::Sorry if I was being rude. [[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:10, 16 March 2010 (EDT)
	::::Just saying it'd be more productive if you spent your time adding information to articles, and only asking for structural changes if you're sure things are definitely wrong. I mean, I at least, don't really mind explaining stuff, but it seems like most of your contributions so far are saying we should fix something or other rather than actually adding to articles. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 10:54, 16 March 2010 (EDT)		::::Just saying it'd be more productive if you spent your time adding information to articles, and only asking for structural changes if you're sure things are definitely wrong. I mean, I at least, don't really mind explaining stuff, but it seems like most of your contributions so far are saying we should fix something or other rather than actually adding to articles. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 10:54, 16 March 2010 (EDT)

			== Proposed move ==
			I didn't add the move tag (that was Starfield), but I do agree with the notion of moving this page to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers 2010 (franchise)". Might be a bit unwieldy a name, but it seems to be the official title of the line going by the logo and I think it would go a long way towards avoiding confusion with the untitled US line coming out this year. --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 15:12, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

Jeysie: /* Featured article */

2010-03-16T14:54:18Z

Item42: /* Featured article */

2010-03-16T08:10:29Z

Jeysie: /* Featured article */

2010-03-15T05:37:07Z

Item42: Please explain featured thing

2010-03-15T05:27:26Z

Please explain featured thing

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 15 March 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This article was featured on the main page, so... shouldn't it have that template on it. Cos not putting the template there would indicate that featuring it on the main page was a mistake or that we should split featured into "shown on front page" and "complete and highly informative"[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 11:35, 13 February 2010 (EST)		This article was featured on the main page, so... shouldn't it have that template on it. Cos not putting the template there would indicate that featuring it on the main page was a mistake or that we should split featured into "shown on front page" and "complete and highly informative"[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 11:35, 13 February 2010 (EST)
			:Please, someone explain why it was featured on the main page. Are we even allowed to feature articles without that Vector Sigma box on the Main Page, just because of some naming coincidence? Cos that's what it seems like...[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 01:27, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

Item42: /* Featured article */ new section

2010-02-13T16:35:56Z

Derik: /* Shortening? */

2009-06-23T06:17:47Z

Shortening?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:17, 23 June 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:It does mean we'll end up having to do 2010 (franchise) and 2010 (year)...		:It does mean we'll end up having to do 2010 (franchise) and 2010 (year)...
	:Plus, wasn't it that "Transformers" only gets dropped if it's the series' name's prefix? The lack of colon here implies to me that "Transformers 2010" is in fact the whole name. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:56, 23 June 2009 (EDT)		:Plus, wasn't it that "Transformers" only gets dropped if it's the series' name's prefix? The lack of colon here implies to me that "Transformers 2010" is in fact the whole name. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:56, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
			::The standard is less consistent than that-- Transformers stays on if it's ''confusing'' without it. "Animated" and "2010" qualify for keepign the "Transformers" part I think. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:17, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

Jeysie: /* Shortening? */

2009-06-23T05:56:29Z

Shortening?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 23 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Shortening?==		==Shortening?==
	Should this be shortened to just [[2010]] for consistency? - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 01:45, 23 June 2009 (EDT)		Should this be shortened to just [[2010]] for consistency? - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 01:45, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
			:It does mean we'll end up having to do 2010 (franchise) and 2010 (year)...
			:Plus, wasn't it that "Transformers" only gets dropped if it's the series' name's prefix? The lack of colon here implies to me that "Transformers 2010" is in fact the whole name. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:56, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 16 March 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::No offense, but you seem to be way too obsessed with making everything 100% fit into neat little packages. Our guidelines are just that--guidelines. We follow them the majority of the time because they make life easier, but the occasional discrepancy for special circumstances happens and it's usually not a mistake or something to worry about. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:37, 15 March 2010 (EDT)		::No offense, but you seem to be way too obsessed with making everything 100% fit into neat little packages. Our guidelines are just that--guidelines. We follow them the majority of the time because they make life easier, but the occasional discrepancy for special circumstances happens and it's usually not a mistake or something to worry about. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:37, 15 March 2010 (EDT)
	:::Sorry if I was being rude. [[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:10, 16 March 2010 (EDT)		:::Sorry if I was being rude. [[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:10, 16 March 2010 (EDT)
			::::Just saying it'd be more productive if you spent your time adding information to articles, and only asking for structural changes if you're sure things are definitely wrong. I mean, I at least, don't really mind explaining stuff, but it seems like most of your contributions so far are saying we should fix something or other rather than actually adding to articles. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 10:54, 16 March 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:10, 16 March 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::Pretty much, yep. While the month-to-month Features are ''usually'' the top-quality articles with the symbol, we sometimes will throw up themed articles related to recent events--holiday related articles for holidays, Transformers 2010 for the year coincidence, the Wreckers article for Wreckers Awareness Week--just so the Wiki can be topical with what's going on in Real Life. Considering these sorts of exceptions are fleeting/temporary, there's no reason to complicate things by making two separate categories.		::Pretty much, yep. While the month-to-month Features are ''usually'' the top-quality articles with the symbol, we sometimes will throw up themed articles related to recent events--holiday related articles for holidays, Transformers 2010 for the year coincidence, the Wreckers article for Wreckers Awareness Week--just so the Wiki can be topical with what's going on in Real Life. Considering these sorts of exceptions are fleeting/temporary, there's no reason to complicate things by making two separate categories.
	::No offense, but you seem to be way too obsessed with making everything 100% fit into neat little packages. Our guidelines are just that--guidelines. We follow them the majority of the time because they make life easier, but the occasional discrepancy for special circumstances happens and it's usually not a mistake or something to worry about. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:37, 15 March 2010 (EDT)		::No offense, but you seem to be way too obsessed with making everything 100% fit into neat little packages. Our guidelines are just that--guidelines. We follow them the majority of the time because they make life easier, but the occasional discrepancy for special circumstances happens and it's usually not a mistake or something to worry about. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:37, 15 March 2010 (EDT)
			:::Sorry if I was being rude. [[User:Item42\|Item42]] 04:10, 16 March 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 15 March 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	This article was featured on the main page, so... shouldn't it have that template on it. Cos not putting the template there would indicate that featuring it on the main page was a mistake or that we should split featured into "shown on front page" and "complete and highly informative"[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 11:35, 13 February 2010 (EST)		This article was featured on the main page, so... shouldn't it have that template on it. Cos not putting the template there would indicate that featuring it on the main page was a mistake or that we should split featured into "shown on front page" and "complete and highly informative"[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 11:35, 13 February 2010 (EST)
	:Please, someone explain why it was featured on the main page. Are we even allowed to feature articles without that Vector Sigma box on the Main Page, just because of some naming coincidence? Cos that's what it seems like...[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 01:27, 15 March 2010 (EDT)		:Please, someone explain why it was featured on the main page. Are we even allowed to feature articles without that Vector Sigma box on the Main Page, just because of some naming coincidence? Cos that's what it seems like...[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 01:27, 15 March 2010 (EDT)
			::Pretty much, yep. While the month-to-month Features are ''usually'' the top-quality articles with the symbol, we sometimes will throw up themed articles related to recent events--holiday related articles for holidays, Transformers 2010 for the year coincidence, the Wreckers article for Wreckers Awareness Week--just so the Wiki can be topical with what's going on in Real Life. Considering these sorts of exceptions are fleeting/temporary, there's no reason to complicate things by making two separate categories.
			::No offense, but you seem to be way too obsessed with making everything 100% fit into neat little packages. Our guidelines are just that--guidelines. We follow them the majority of the time because they make life easier, but the occasional discrepancy for special circumstances happens and it's usually not a mistake or something to worry about. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:37, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 13 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Plus, wasn't it that "Transformers" only gets dropped if it's the series' name's prefix? The lack of colon here implies to me that "Transformers 2010" is in fact the whole name. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:56, 23 June 2009 (EDT)		:Plus, wasn't it that "Transformers" only gets dropped if it's the series' name's prefix? The lack of colon here implies to me that "Transformers 2010" is in fact the whole name. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 01:56, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
	::The standard is less consistent than that-- Transformers stays on if it's ''confusing'' without it. "Animated" and "2010" qualify for keepign the "Transformers" part I think. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:17, 23 June 2009 (EDT)		::The standard is less consistent than that-- Transformers stays on if it's ''confusing'' without it. "Animated" and "2010" qualify for keepign the "Transformers" part I think. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:17, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

			== Featured article ==

			This article was featured on the main page, so... shouldn't it have that template on it. Cos not putting the template there would indicate that featuring it on the main page was a mistake or that we should split featured into "shown on front page" and "complete and highly informative"[[User:Item42\|Item42]] 11:35, 13 February 2010 (EST)