Talk:Firebug (G1) - Revision history

M Sipher: Talk:Firebug moved to Talk:Firebug (G1)

2012-08-24T15:52:22Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:52, 24 August 2012
(No difference)

Chris McFeely at 20:32, 21 November 2009

2009-11-21T20:32:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 21 November 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Why do you need to overcomplicate things? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:32, 21 November 2009 (EST)		::Why do you need to overcomplicate things? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:32, 21 November 2009 (EST)

	Oh, for goodness SAKE. Star, it's NOT necessary to make separate pages to get around Interro's persnicketyness, and Interro, there's no good reason to remove those categories. Firebugs were comic-and-European-original creations, they fit fine into those categories. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 15:29, 21 November 2009 (EST)		Oh, for goodness SAKE. Star, it's NOT necessary to make separate pages to get around Interro's persnicketyness, and Interro, there's no good reason to remove those categories. Firebugs were comic-and-European-original creations, they fit fine into those categories. Don't make me clonk your heads together!! - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 15:29, 21 November 2009 (EST)

Chris McFeely at 20:29, 21 November 2009

2009-11-21T20:29:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 21 November 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Nevermind. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)		:Nevermind. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)
	::Why do you need to overcomplicate things? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:32, 21 November 2009 (EST)		::Why do you need to overcomplicate things? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:32, 21 November 2009 (EST)

			Oh, for goodness SAKE. Star, it's NOT necessary to make separate pages to get around Interro's persnicketyness, and Interro, there's no good reason to remove those categories. Firebugs were comic-and-European-original creations, they fit fine into those categories. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 15:29, 21 November 2009 (EST)

Interrobang at 18:32, 21 November 2009

2009-11-21T18:32:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 21 November 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I think the best way to handle information about this topic is to bend the rules and have one page covering both the species Firebug and the only notable Firebug character. If not, we will have one very short page explaining the Firebug species that points to another very short page that tells you what the only notable Firebug did in fiction. ([http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Firebug&oldid=393698 This is what the combined page would look like.]) If you want to find out about the Firebug species is like you would have to link out from the Firebug character page. Plus, it would drive a Firebug (disambiguation) page with [[Firebug!]], "Firebug (species)", and "Firebug (character)". I don't mind making all those pages, but I don't think it is necessary. Thoughts? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:03, 21 November 2009 (EST)		I think the best way to handle information about this topic is to bend the rules and have one page covering both the species Firebug and the only notable Firebug character. If not, we will have one very short page explaining the Firebug species that points to another very short page that tells you what the only notable Firebug did in fiction. ([http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Firebug&oldid=393698 This is what the combined page would look like.]) If you want to find out about the Firebug species is like you would have to link out from the Firebug character page. Plus, it would drive a Firebug (disambiguation) page with [[Firebug!]], "Firebug (species)", and "Firebug (character)". I don't mind making all those pages, but I don't think it is necessary. Thoughts? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:03, 21 November 2009 (EST)
	:Nevermind. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)		:Nevermind. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)
			::Why do you need to overcomplicate things? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:32, 21 November 2009 (EST)

Starfield at 17:16, 21 November 2009

2009-11-21T17:16:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 21 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I think the best way to handle information about this topic is to bend the rules and have one page covering both the species Firebug and the only notable Firebug character. If not, we will have one very short page explaining the Firebug species that points to another very short page that tells you what the only notable Firebug did in fiction. ([http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Firebug&oldid=393698 This is what the combined page would look like.]) If you want to find out about the Firebug species is like you would have to link out from the Firebug character page. Plus, it would drive a Firebug (disambiguation) page with [[Firebug!]], "Firebug (species)", and "Firebug (character)". I don't mind making all those pages, but I don't think it is necessary. Thoughts? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:03, 21 November 2009 (EST)		I think the best way to handle information about this topic is to bend the rules and have one page covering both the species Firebug and the only notable Firebug character. If not, we will have one very short page explaining the Firebug species that points to another very short page that tells you what the only notable Firebug did in fiction. ([http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Firebug&oldid=393698 This is what the combined page would look like.]) If you want to find out about the Firebug species is like you would have to link out from the Firebug character page. Plus, it would drive a Firebug (disambiguation) page with [[Firebug!]], "Firebug (species)", and "Firebug (character)". I don't mind making all those pages, but I don't think it is necessary. Thoughts? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:03, 21 November 2009 (EST)
			:Nevermind. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)

Starfield: Combine character and species pages?

2009-11-21T16:03:25Z

Combine character and species pages?

New page

== Combine character and species pages? ==

I think the best way to handle information about this topic is to bend the rules and have one page covering both the species Firebug and the only notable Firebug character. If not, we will have one very short page explaining the Firebug species that points to another very short page that tells you what the only notable Firebug did in fiction. ([http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Firebug&oldid=393698 This is what the combined page would look like.]) If you want to find out about the Firebug species is like you would have to link out from the Firebug character page. Plus, it would drive a Firebug (disambiguation) page with [[Firebug!]], "Firebug (species)", and "Firebug (character)". I don't mind making all those pages, but I don't think it is necessary. Thoughts? - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 11:03, 21 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 21 November 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Nevermind. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)		:Nevermind. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)
	::Why do you need to overcomplicate things? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:32, 21 November 2009 (EST)		::Why do you need to overcomplicate things? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 13:32, 21 November 2009 (EST)

			Oh, for goodness SAKE. Star, it's NOT necessary to make separate pages to get around Interro's persnicketyness, and Interro, there's no good reason to remove those categories. Firebugs were comic-and-European-original creations, they fit fine into those categories. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 15:29, 21 November 2009 (EST)