Talk:Generations Selects (toyline) - Revision history

Poliwag06: /* Magnificus is the last GS toy TT released natively? */ new section

2024-12-29T10:51:43Z

Magnificus is the last GS toy TT released natively?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 29 December 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)
	::The Behold! Galvatron set is explicitly labelled Generations Selects on its box, and the box itself is in GS style. It should be included on this page. -{{unsigned\|Repersonne\|08:51, 1 October 2024 (EDT)}}		::The Behold! Galvatron set is explicitly labelled Generations Selects on its box, and the box itself is in GS style. It should be included on this page. -{{unsigned\|Repersonne\|08:51, 1 October 2024 (EDT)}}

			== Magnificus is the last GS toy TT released natively? ==

			The Takara Tomy section suddenly cut off after magnificus, which seems to mislead me into thinking TT didn't release the stuff listed after it for their markets. Did they actually?[[User:Poliwag06\|Poliwag06]] ([[User talk:Poliwag06\|talk]]) 05:51, 29 December 2024 (EST)

Lonegamer78: /* Split */

2024-10-05T01:57:14Z

Split

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:57, 5 October 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	My biggest issue with a split is that HasTak treats the line as a single entity. Some of the Hasbro toys are sold in the Japanese market and the Takara toys are sold in the Western market. It's very different to Generations Japan where Takara didn't really know what they were doing with that set of toys until creating the Legends line. The brand-unification is also a big thing to think about too. Unlike the Japanese Generations line, all of the figures shared between the two markets are identical, even if the website listings like to give them different names and ID numbers. -- [[User:Fanofcoolstuff27\|Fanofcoolstuff27]] ([[User talk:Fanofcoolstuff27\|talk]]) 17:53, 14 February 2022 (EST)		My biggest issue with a split is that HasTak treats the line as a single entity. Some of the Hasbro toys are sold in the Japanese market and the Takara toys are sold in the Western market. It's very different to Generations Japan where Takara didn't really know what they were doing with that set of toys until creating the Legends line. The brand-unification is also a big thing to think about too. Unlike the Japanese Generations line, all of the figures shared between the two markets are identical, even if the website listings like to give them different names and ID numbers. -- [[User:Fanofcoolstuff27\|Fanofcoolstuff27]] ([[User talk:Fanofcoolstuff27\|talk]]) 17:53, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	I ''really'' don't see the benefit of a split here, especially to a reader. It's not like the page is massive or unwieldy. All a split would do is introduce needless hoop-jumping for content that is incredibly similar because... pedantry? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:39, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:I ''really'' don't see the benefit of a split here, especially to a reader. It's not like the page is massive or unwieldy. All a split would do is introduce needless hoop-jumping for content that is incredibly similar because... pedantry? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:39, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)
	:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)
			::The Behold! Galvatron set is explicitly labelled Generations Selects on its box, and the box itself is in GS style. It should be included on this page. -{{unsigned\|Repersonne\|08:51, 1 October 2024 (EDT)}}
	The Behold! Galvatron set is explicitly labelled Generations Selects on its box, and the box itself is in GS style. It should be included on this page.

Repersonne: /* Split */

2024-10-01T12:51:05Z

Split

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 1 October 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)

			The Behold! Galvatron set is explicitly labelled Generations Selects on its box, and the box itself is in GS style. It should be included on this page.

Dingdongdude at 14:26, 9 April 2022

2022-04-09T14:26:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 9 April 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	No split is needed IMO, because the Japanese toyline is really just the US version delayed a little bit. It would really just be unnecessary.[[User:Dingdongdude\|Dingdongdude]] ([[User talk:Dingdongdude\|talk]]) 10:05, 9 April 2022 (EDT)

Dingdongdude at 14:05, 9 April 2022

2022-04-09T14:05:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 9 April 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	No split is needed IMO, because the Japanese toyline is really just the US version delayed a little bit. It would really just be unnecessary.		No split is needed IMO, because the Japanese toyline is really just the US version delayed a little bit. It would really just be unnecessary.[[User:Dingdongdude\|Dingdongdude]] ([[User talk:Dingdongdude\|talk]]) 10:05, 9 April 2022 (EDT)

Dingdongdude at 14:04, 9 April 2022

2022-04-09T14:04:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 9 April 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)

			No split is needed IMO, because the Japanese toyline is really just the US version delayed a little bit. It would really just be unnecessary.

ItsWalky: /* Split */

2022-02-15T04:27:35Z

Split

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:27, 15 February 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	This is a very small page. Why? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)

ItsWalky at 04:27, 15 February 2022

2022-02-15T04:27:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:27, 15 February 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)		I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)
	:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)

			This is a very small page. Why? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)

Saix: /* Split */

2022-02-15T03:32:01Z

Split

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:32, 15 February 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)		I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)
			:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)

KilMichaelMcC at 01:50, 15 February 2022

2022-02-15T01:50:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 15 February 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I ''really'' don't see the benefit of a split here, especially to a reader. It's not like the page is massive or unwieldy. All a split would do is introduce needless hoop-jumping for content that is incredibly similar because... pedantry? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:39, 14 February 2022 (EST)		I ''really'' don't see the benefit of a split here, especially to a reader. It's not like the page is massive or unwieldy. All a split would do is introduce needless hoop-jumping for content that is incredibly similar because... pedantry? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:39, 14 February 2022 (EST)

			I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:57, 5 October 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	My biggest issue with a split is that HasTak treats the line as a single entity. Some of the Hasbro toys are sold in the Japanese market and the Takara toys are sold in the Western market. It's very different to Generations Japan where Takara didn't really know what they were doing with that set of toys until creating the Legends line. The brand-unification is also a big thing to think about too. Unlike the Japanese Generations line, all of the figures shared between the two markets are identical, even if the website listings like to give them different names and ID numbers. -- [[User:Fanofcoolstuff27\|Fanofcoolstuff27]] ([[User talk:Fanofcoolstuff27\|talk]]) 17:53, 14 February 2022 (EST)		My biggest issue with a split is that HasTak treats the line as a single entity. Some of the Hasbro toys are sold in the Japanese market and the Takara toys are sold in the Western market. It's very different to Generations Japan where Takara didn't really know what they were doing with that set of toys until creating the Legends line. The brand-unification is also a big thing to think about too. Unlike the Japanese Generations line, all of the figures shared between the two markets are identical, even if the website listings like to give them different names and ID numbers. -- [[User:Fanofcoolstuff27\|Fanofcoolstuff27]] ([[User talk:Fanofcoolstuff27\|talk]]) 17:53, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	I ''really'' don't see the benefit of a split here, especially to a reader. It's not like the page is massive or unwieldy. All a split would do is introduce needless hoop-jumping for content that is incredibly similar because... pedantry? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:39, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:I ''really'' don't see the benefit of a split here, especially to a reader. It's not like the page is massive or unwieldy. All a split would do is introduce needless hoop-jumping for content that is incredibly similar because... pedantry? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 19:39, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)
	:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)

	This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:This is a very small page. Why is a split necessary? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)
			::The Behold! Galvatron set is explicitly labelled Generations Selects on its box, and the box itself is in GS style. It should be included on this page. -{{unsigned\|Repersonne\|08:51, 1 October 2024 (EDT)}}
	The Behold! Galvatron set is explicitly labelled Generations Selects on its box, and the box itself is in GS style. It should be included on this page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:27, 15 February 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)		I see no reason for a split. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 February 2022 (EST)
	:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)		:Yeah, I don't see the point here? Both companies clearly consider both "toylines" to be the same. Generations Japan was split because it was part of a bunch of CHUG toylines on Takara's side and it was otherwise buried in the Hasbro toyline page that had entirely different coverage of toys. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 22:32, 14 February 2022 (EST)

			This is a very small page. Why? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:27, 14 February 2022 (EST)