Talk:Greenlight - Revision history

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: Adjusting talk page headers

2024-11-18T20:13:49Z

Adjusting talk page headers

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 18 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Fan-colored model as main image ==

	Anyway i don't 100% like having a fancolored model at the top of the page, but on the OTHER hand I also really hate all those fan-drawn character models across the internet being passed off as the real model sheets, and I guess I hate coloring lineart for a mainpic less than that. But, like, I guess, list the reasons why I'm wrong below, because this is negotiable. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:30, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		Anyway i don't 100% like having a fancolored model at the top of the page, but on the OTHER hand I also really hate all those fan-drawn character models across the internet being passed off as the real model sheets, and I guess I hate coloring lineart for a mainpic less than that. But, like, I guess, list the reasons why I'm wrong below, because this is negotiable. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:30, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
	:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
Line 5:		Line 7:
	== Moved discussion from "Talk:Greenlight (One)" ==		== Moved discussion from "Talk:Greenlight (One)" ==

	~~== Does this character exist? ==~~
	Well, with page moves finally turned back on, I see the G1 character is still at the namespace "Greenlight (G1)". Does that mean we do or do not accept Greenlight as the identity of the unnamed generic in ''Transformers One'' who evidently was not scripted in time to receive a Chinese trading card from Kayou? Should the previously deleted page be restored pending a discussion? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (EDT)		Well, with page moves finally turned back on, I see the G1 character is still at the namespace "Greenlight (G1)". Does that mean we do or do not accept Greenlight as the identity of the unnamed generic in ''Transformers One'' who evidently was not scripted in time to receive a Chinese trading card from Kayou? Should the previously deleted page be restored pending a discussion? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
	:I'm still firmly of the opinion that "Lancer" and "Greenlight" are just generics in the G1 characters' colours, but I recognise that I'm probably outvoted on that point. --[[User:Broadside\|Broadside]] ([[User talk:Broadside\|talk]]) 15:24, 22 October 2024 (EDT)		:I'm still firmly of the opinion that "Lancer" and "Greenlight" are just generics in the G1 characters' colours, but I recognise that I'm probably outvoted on that point. --[[User:Broadside\|Broadside]] ([[User talk:Broadside\|talk]]) 15:24, 22 October 2024 (EDT)

Boingus: /* Does this character exist? */

2024-11-13T03:03:01Z

Does this character exist?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 13 November 2024
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::Because too many people were making bad calls. The admins had no choice. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:53, 22 October 2024 (EDT)		:::::Because too many people were making bad calls. The admins had no choice. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:53, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
	Very well then. Any objections against the consensus of no page? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 23:30, 2 November 2024 (EDT)		Very well then. Any objections against the consensus of no page? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 23:30, 2 November 2024 (EDT)
			:Not really something I'm willing to fight about but consider a lot of the miner designs are only like 50% accurate since theyre mostly recolors of the same few parts. Like Moonracer doesn't really look like Moonracer, in fact I think her head is more based on Lancer than G1 Moonracer. There's also a few obvious cameos that dont get cards or concept art like Red alert [[User:Boingus\|--Boingus]] ([[User talk:Boingus\|talk]])

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: /* Moved discussion from "Talk:Greenlight (One)" */ new section

2024-11-13T01:54:40Z

Moved discussion from "Talk:Greenlight (One)": new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 13 November 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
	::I keep thinking about how we have Elita One's real vehicle mode model way at the bottom of her page and how that makes like zero headway in how much the made-up vehicle mode gets passed around. I realize that's not really the intended utility of the mainpic, I just... I just want to kind of brute-force some headway towards curbing misinformation. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:46, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		::I keep thinking about how we have Elita One's real vehicle mode model way at the bottom of her page and how that makes like zero headway in how much the made-up vehicle mode gets passed around. I realize that's not really the intended utility of the mainpic, I just... I just want to kind of brute-force some headway towards curbing misinformation. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:46, 27 July 2024 (EDT)

			== Moved discussion from "Talk:Greenlight (One)" ==

			== Does this character exist? ==
			Well, with page moves finally turned back on, I see the G1 character is still at the namespace "Greenlight (G1)". Does that mean we do or do not accept Greenlight as the identity of the unnamed generic in ''Transformers One'' who evidently was not scripted in time to receive a Chinese trading card from Kayou? Should the previously deleted page be restored pending a discussion? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			:I'm still firmly of the opinion that "Lancer" and "Greenlight" are just generics in the G1 characters' colours, but I recognise that I'm probably outvoted on that point. --[[User:Broadside\|Broadside]] ([[User talk:Broadside\|talk]]) 15:24, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			::There's multiples of both in most scenes, simultaneously. I counted at least six Lancers in the crowd for Orion's big miner speech! There's so many Lancers. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 15:45, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			:::Okay well to be fair on THAT I'm pretty sure we've got at least two Sunstreakers in that crowd and he was named by the trading cards. I'm just not convinced we should be confidently saying "yeah this is [character X]" for any miner that hasn't been officially labeled, given that most of the miners are generic models recoloured rather than having specific design details of existing characters. --[[User:Broadside\|Broadside]] ([[User talk:Broadside\|talk]]) 16:03, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			::::Why were page moves disabled for a bit anyway? I would've used it to move 'Greenlight (G1)' back to 'Greenlight' at the time.--[[User:CyclonustheWarrior\|CyclonustheWarrior]] ([[User talk:CyclonustheWarrior\|talk]]) 16:23, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			:::::Because too many people were making bad calls. The admins had no choice. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:53, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			Very well then. Any objections against the consensus of no page? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 23:30, 2 November 2024 (EDT)

Abates: Abates moved page Talk:Greenlight (G1) to Talk:Greenlight

2024-10-28T01:02:20Z

Abates moved page Talk:Greenlight (G1) to Talk:Greenlight

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:02, 28 October 2024
(No difference)

Lonegamer78: Lonegamer78 moved page Talk:Greenlight(G1) to Talk:Greenlight (G1) without leaving a redirect: Improperly named

2024-09-22T07:06:43Z

Lonegamer78 moved page Talk:Greenlight(G1) to Talk:Greenlight (G1) without leaving a redirect: Improperly named

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:06, 22 September 2024
(No difference)

VKittyCat2024: VKittyCat2024 moved page Talk:Greenlight(g1) to Talk:Greenlight(G1)

2024-09-21T18:48:14Z

VKittyCat2024 moved page Talk:Greenlight(g1) to Talk:Greenlight(G1)

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:48, 21 September 2024
(No difference)

VKittyCat2024: VKittyCat2024 moved page Talk:Greenlight to Talk:Greenlight(g1)

2024-09-21T18:45:34Z

VKittyCat2024 moved page Talk:Greenlight to Talk:Greenlight(g1)

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:45, 21 September 2024
(No difference)

CyclonustheWarrior: CyclonustheWarrior moved page Talk:Greenlight (G1) to Talk:Greenlight over redirect

2024-09-20T15:44:55Z

CyclonustheWarrior moved page Talk:Greenlight (G1) to Talk:Greenlight over redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:44, 20 September 2024
(No difference)

Kiddiecraft: Kiddiecraft moved page Talk:Greenlight to Talk:Greenlight (G1)

2024-09-20T15:41:40Z

Kiddiecraft moved page Talk:Greenlight to Talk:Greenlight (G1)

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:41, 20 September 2024
(No difference)

ItsWalky at 03:46, 28 July 2024

2024-07-28T03:46:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 28 July 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Anyway i don't 100% like having a fancolored model at the top of the page, but on the OTHER hand I also really hate all those fan-drawn character models across the internet being passed off as the real model sheets, and I guess I hate coloring lineart for a mainpic less than that. But, like, I guess, list the reasons why I'm wrong below, because this is negotiable. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:30, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		Anyway i don't 100% like having a fancolored model at the top of the page, but on the OTHER hand I also really hate all those fan-drawn character models across the internet being passed off as the real model sheets, and I guess I hate coloring lineart for a mainpic less than that. But, like, I guess, list the reasons why I'm wrong below, because this is negotiable. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:30, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
	:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
			::I keep thinking about how we have Elita One's real vehicle mode model way at the bottom of her page and how that makes like zero headway in how much the made-up vehicle mode gets passed around. I realize that's not really the intended utility of the mainpic, I just... I just want to kind of brute-force some headway towards curbing misinformation. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:46, 27 July 2024 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 13 November 2024
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::Because too many people were making bad calls. The admins had no choice. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:53, 22 October 2024 (EDT)		:::::Because too many people were making bad calls. The admins had no choice. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:53, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
	Very well then. Any objections against the consensus of no page? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 23:30, 2 November 2024 (EDT)		Very well then. Any objections against the consensus of no page? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 23:30, 2 November 2024 (EDT)
			:Not really something I'm willing to fight about but consider a lot of the miner designs are only like 50% accurate since theyre mostly recolors of the same few parts. Like Moonracer doesn't really look like Moonracer, in fact I think her head is more based on Lancer than G1 Moonracer. There's also a few obvious cameos that dont get cards or concept art like Red alert [[User:Boingus\|--Boingus]] ([[User talk:Boingus\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 13 November 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
	::I keep thinking about how we have Elita One's real vehicle mode model way at the bottom of her page and how that makes like zero headway in how much the made-up vehicle mode gets passed around. I realize that's not really the intended utility of the mainpic, I just... I just want to kind of brute-force some headway towards curbing misinformation. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:46, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		::I keep thinking about how we have Elita One's real vehicle mode model way at the bottom of her page and how that makes like zero headway in how much the made-up vehicle mode gets passed around. I realize that's not really the intended utility of the mainpic, I just... I just want to kind of brute-force some headway towards curbing misinformation. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:46, 27 July 2024 (EDT)

			== Moved discussion from "Talk:Greenlight (One)" ==

			== Does this character exist? ==
			Well, with page moves finally turned back on, I see the G1 character is still at the namespace "Greenlight (G1)". Does that mean we do or do not accept Greenlight as the identity of the unnamed generic in ''Transformers One'' who evidently was not scripted in time to receive a Chinese trading card from Kayou? Should the previously deleted page be restored pending a discussion? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			:I'm still firmly of the opinion that "Lancer" and "Greenlight" are just generics in the G1 characters' colours, but I recognise that I'm probably outvoted on that point. --[[User:Broadside\|Broadside]] ([[User talk:Broadside\|talk]]) 15:24, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			::There's multiples of both in most scenes, simultaneously. I counted at least six Lancers in the crowd for Orion's big miner speech! There's so many Lancers. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 15:45, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			:::Okay well to be fair on THAT I'm pretty sure we've got at least two Sunstreakers in that crowd and he was named by the trading cards. I'm just not convinced we should be confidently saying "yeah this is [character X]" for any miner that hasn't been officially labeled, given that most of the miners are generic models recoloured rather than having specific design details of existing characters. --[[User:Broadside\|Broadside]] ([[User talk:Broadside\|talk]]) 16:03, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			::::Why were page moves disabled for a bit anyway? I would've used it to move 'Greenlight (G1)' back to 'Greenlight' at the time.--[[User:CyclonustheWarrior\|CyclonustheWarrior]] ([[User talk:CyclonustheWarrior\|talk]]) 16:23, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			:::::Because too many people were making bad calls. The admins had no choice. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 17:53, 22 October 2024 (EDT)
			Very well then. Any objections against the consensus of no page? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 23:30, 2 November 2024 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 28 July 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Anyway i don't 100% like having a fancolored model at the top of the page, but on the OTHER hand I also really hate all those fan-drawn character models across the internet being passed off as the real model sheets, and I guess I hate coloring lineart for a mainpic less than that. But, like, I guess, list the reasons why I'm wrong below, because this is negotiable. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:30, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		Anyway i don't 100% like having a fancolored model at the top of the page, but on the OTHER hand I also really hate all those fan-drawn character models across the internet being passed off as the real model sheets, and I guess I hate coloring lineart for a mainpic less than that. But, like, I guess, list the reasons why I'm wrong below, because this is negotiable. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 20:30, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
	:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)		:If I HAD to quibble, it'd be at having it at the top of the page. Might be best to stick with the cartoon shot as a mainpic then drop the model down to Notes? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:03, 27 July 2024 (EDT)
			::I keep thinking about how we have Elita One's real vehicle mode model way at the bottom of her page and how that makes like zero headway in how much the made-up vehicle mode gets passed around. I realize that's not really the intended utility of the mainpic, I just... I just want to kind of brute-force some headway towards curbing misinformation. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 23:46, 27 July 2024 (EDT)