Talk:Grimlock (RID 2015) - Revision history

TechnicalJim at 20:31, 30 August 2023

2023-08-30T20:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 30 August 2023
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (EST)		:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (EST)
	:Eh, OK then. I won't argue. [[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 17:04, 23 February 2023 (EST)		:Eh, OK then. I won't argue. [[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 17:04, 23 February 2023 (EST)

			=== Undocumented Feature ===

			Do mentions of undocumented features require images showing it?[[User:TechnicalJim\|TechnicalJim]] ([[User talk:TechnicalJim\|talk]]) 16:31, 30 August 2023 (EDT)

ThatGuy79: /* Toy split */

2023-02-23T22:04:33Z

Toy split

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 23 February 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I think Grimlock is way past the point of getting his own toys and merchandise page. I don't know if there's a specific quota, but I feel like Grimlock is there. Opinions?[[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2023 (EST)		I think Grimlock is way past the point of getting his own toys and merchandise page. I don't know if there's a specific quota, but I feel like Grimlock is there. Opinions?[[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2023 (EST)
	:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (EST)		:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (EST)
			:Eh, OK then. I won't argue. [[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 17:04, 23 February 2023 (EST)

M Sipher: /* Toy split */

2023-02-23T01:04:09Z

Toy split

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 23 February 2023
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I think Grimlock is way past the point of getting his own toys and merchandise page. I don't know if there's a specific quota, but I feel like Grimlock is there. Opinions?[[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2023 (EST)		I think Grimlock is way past the point of getting his own toys and merchandise page. I don't know if there's a specific quota, but I feel like Grimlock is there. Opinions?[[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2023 (EST)
			:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (EST)

ThatGuy79: /* Toy split */ new section

2023-02-22T16:26:19Z

Toy split: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 22 February 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:
	== Two Grimlocks? ==		== Two Grimlocks? ==
	''Rescue Bots Academy'' seems to have muddled the distinctions between RID Grimlock and FOC Grimlock. We've got a very much RID Grimlock that was Dinobot leader and friends with Snarl and Sludge. I think the ''Two Grimlocks'' section should be updated to reflect this issue.[[User:SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron\|SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron]]([[User talk:SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron\|talk]])01:39, 11 December 2020		''Rescue Bots Academy'' seems to have muddled the distinctions between RID Grimlock and FOC Grimlock. We've got a very much RID Grimlock that was Dinobot leader and friends with Snarl and Sludge. I think the ''Two Grimlocks'' section should be updated to reflect this issue.[[User:SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron\|SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron]]([[User talk:SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron\|talk]])01:39, 11 December 2020

			== Toy split ==

			I think Grimlock is way past the point of getting his own toys and merchandise page. I don't know if there's a specific quota, but I feel like Grimlock is there. Opinions?[[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2023 (EST)

SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron at 06:42, 11 December 2020

2020-12-11T06:42:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 11 December 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:

	== Two Grimlocks? ==		== Two Grimlocks? ==
	''Rescue Bots Academy'' seems to have muddled the distinctions between RID Grimlock and FOC Grimlock. We've got a very much RID Grimlock that was Dinobot leader and friends with Snarl and Sludge. I think the ''Two Grimlocks'' section should be updated to reflect this ~~issues~~.		''Rescue Bots Academy'' seems to have muddled the distinctions between RID Grimlock and FOC Grimlock. We've got a very much RID Grimlock that was Dinobot leader and friends with Snarl and Sludge. I think the ''Two Grimlocks'' section should be updated to reflect this issue.[[User:SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron\|SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron]]([[User talk:SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron\|talk]])01:39, 11 December 2020

SentinelPrimeKnightOfCybertron at 06:33, 11 December 2020

2020-12-11T06:33:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:33, 11 December 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
	::::::Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)		::::::Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)

			== Two Grimlocks? ==
			''Rescue Bots Academy'' seems to have muddled the distinctions between RID Grimlock and FOC Grimlock. We've got a very much RID Grimlock that was Dinobot leader and friends with Snarl and Sludge. I think the ''Two Grimlocks'' section should be updated to reflect this issues.

T0nySt1nk: /* FOC-RID Grimlock */

2020-07-02T13:12:45Z

FOC-RID Grimlock

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 2 July 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
	:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
	:~~....~~Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)		::::::Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)

T0nySt1nk: /* FOC-RID Grimlock */

2020-07-02T12:48:00Z

FOC-RID Grimlock

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 2 July 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
	:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
			:....Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)

Escargon: /* FOC-RID Grimlock */

2020-07-02T03:14:33Z

FOC-RID Grimlock

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 2 July 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)		: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)
	Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
			:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)

T0nySt1nk: /* FOC-RID Grimlock */

2020-07-02T02:49:49Z

FOC-RID Grimlock

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 2 July 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Unlike the FOC Grimlock, the RID 2015 Grimlock green and black. Why is this so? They are the same, for FOC and RID 2015 are both part of the Aligned continuity. Also, why did Grimlock become a Decepticon? [[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 21:52, 28 June 2020 (EDT)		Unlike the FOC Grimlock, the RID 2015 Grimlock green and black. Why is this so? They are the same, for FOC and RID 2015 are both part of the Aligned continuity. Also, why did Grimlock become a Decepticon? [[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 21:52, 28 June 2020 (EDT)
	: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)		: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)
			Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 23 February 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I think Grimlock is way past the point of getting his own toys and merchandise page. I don't know if there's a specific quota, but I feel like Grimlock is there. Opinions?[[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2023 (EST)		I think Grimlock is way past the point of getting his own toys and merchandise page. I don't know if there's a specific quota, but I feel like Grimlock is there. Opinions?[[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2023 (EST)
	:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (EST)		:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (EST)
			:Eh, OK then. I won't argue. [[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 17:04, 23 February 2023 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 2 July 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
	:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
	:~~....~~Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)		::::::Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 2 July 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
	:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
			:....Oh.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 08:48, 2 July 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 2 July 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)		: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)
	Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)		Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)
			:...Did you seriously not read the article? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:14, 1 July 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 2 July 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Unlike the FOC Grimlock, the RID 2015 Grimlock green and black. Why is this so? They are the same, for FOC and RID 2015 are both part of the Aligned continuity. Also, why did Grimlock become a Decepticon? [[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 21:52, 28 June 2020 (EDT)		Unlike the FOC Grimlock, the RID 2015 Grimlock green and black. Why is this so? They are the same, for FOC and RID 2015 are both part of the Aligned continuity. Also, why did Grimlock become a Decepticon? [[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 21:52, 28 June 2020 (EDT)
	: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)		: [[Grimlock_(RID_2015)#Two_Grimlocks?]] [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (EDT)
			Also, I think we should merge this article with the FOC Grimlock article. After all, they are both from the Aligned continuity, and share the same name and alt mode.[[User:T0nySt1nk\|T0nySt1nk]] ([[User talk:T0nySt1nk\|talk]]) 22:49, 1 July 2020 (EDT)