Talk:Guardian Knight - Revision history

Sabrblade: /* Knight survival */

2017-09-22T12:53:13Z

Knight survival

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 22 September 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:

	There appears (amid shaky cam) to be 12 knights coming out onto the surface of their ship in the scene just after Megatron and Nitro Zeus steal the Staff of Merlin. As Burton stated earlier that there were 12 Guardian Knights, are we to take this as confirmation that Skullitron and the two Knights whom Optimus cut down in fact survived and were present in this scene? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 01:03, 22 September 2017 (EDT)		There appears (amid shaky cam) to be 12 knights coming out onto the surface of their ship in the scene just after Megatron and Nitro Zeus steal the Staff of Merlin. As Burton stated earlier that there were 12 Guardian Knights, are we to take this as confirmation that Skullitron and the two Knights whom Optimus cut down in fact survived and were present in this scene? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 01:03, 22 September 2017 (EDT)
			:These movies are rarely consistent on continuity and such, so I doubt the appearance of 12 knights on the ship after two of them seemingly perished was anything more than a goof. But, as the film is still not particularly clear on the matter itself (let alone a ton of other things), I'd suggest we take a more impartial stand on this and not lean towards either side of the matter, leaving it open to interpretation (as the movie itself does). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 08:53, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: /* Knight survival */ new section

2017-09-22T05:03:56Z

Knight survival: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 22 September 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[http://news.tfw2005.com/2017/06/01/transformers-movie-toys-revealed-cybertron-planet-leader-dragonstorm-voyager-nitro-340070 Solicitation bios] for the toyline refer to the knights as "Knights of Cybertron". Do we treat this as a valid alternate name? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 20:24, 4 July 2017 (EDT)		[http://news.tfw2005.com/2017/06/01/transformers-movie-toys-revealed-cybertron-planet-leader-dragonstorm-voyager-nitro-340070 Solicitation bios] for the toyline refer to the knights as "Knights of Cybertron". Do we treat this as a valid alternate name? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 20:24, 4 July 2017 (EDT)

			== Knight survival ==

			There appears (amid shaky cam) to be 12 knights coming out onto the surface of their ship in the scene just after Megatron and Nitro Zeus steal the Staff of Merlin. As Burton stated earlier that there were 12 Guardian Knights, are we to take this as confirmation that Skullitron and the two Knights whom Optimus cut down in fact survived and were present in this scene? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 01:03, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Knights of Iacon to Talk:Guardian Knight

2017-09-22T00:27:56Z

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Knights of Iacon to Talk:Guardian Knight

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:27, 22 September 2017
(No difference)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 at 00:27, 5 July 2017

2017-07-05T00:27:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 5 July 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Dragonicus, at least, is very clearly one of the onscreen Knights - he's the one who got his own poster image, and the one on the left-hand of the shot of the Knights forming a sword canopy around the Round Table. I also think we would be being willfully ignorant if we tried to pretend the rusty old Knight whose face falls off isn't Skullitron - without that scene, we surely don't get a toy of a guy with his faceplate missing and a gross skull underneath. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 15:32, 22 June 2017 (EDT)		Dragonicus, at least, is very clearly one of the onscreen Knights - he's the one who got his own poster image, and the one on the left-hand of the shot of the Knights forming a sword canopy around the Round Table. I also think we would be being willfully ignorant if we tried to pretend the rusty old Knight whose face falls off isn't Skullitron - without that scene, we surely don't get a toy of a guy with his faceplate missing and a gross skull underneath. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 15:32, 22 June 2017 (EDT)

	[http://news.tfw2005.com/2017/06/01/transformers-movie-toys-revealed-cybertron-planet-leader-dragonstorm-voyager-nitro-340070 Solicitation bios] for the toyline refer to the knights as ~~the~~ "Knights of Cybertron". Do we treat this as a valid alternate name? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 20:24, 4 July 2017 (EDT)		[http://news.tfw2005.com/2017/06/01/transformers-movie-toys-revealed-cybertron-planet-leader-dragonstorm-voyager-nitro-340070 Solicitation bios] for the toyline refer to the knights as "Knights of Cybertron". Do we treat this as a valid alternate name? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 20:24, 4 July 2017 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 at 00:24, 5 July 2017

2017-07-05T00:24:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 5 July 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Dragonicus, at least, is very clearly one of the onscreen Knights - he's the one who got his own poster image, and the one on the left-hand of the shot of the Knights forming a sword canopy around the Round Table. I also think we would be being willfully ignorant if we tried to pretend the rusty old Knight whose face falls off isn't Skullitron - without that scene, we surely don't get a toy of a guy with his faceplate missing and a gross skull underneath. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 15:32, 22 June 2017 (EDT)		Dragonicus, at least, is very clearly one of the onscreen Knights - he's the one who got his own poster image, and the one on the left-hand of the shot of the Knights forming a sword canopy around the Round Table. I also think we would be being willfully ignorant if we tried to pretend the rusty old Knight whose face falls off isn't Skullitron - without that scene, we surely don't get a toy of a guy with his faceplate missing and a gross skull underneath. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 15:32, 22 June 2017 (EDT)

			[http://news.tfw2005.com/2017/06/01/transformers-movie-toys-revealed-cybertron-planet-leader-dragonstorm-voyager-nitro-340070 Solicitation bios] for the toyline refer to the knights as the "Knights of Cybertron". Do we treat this as a valid alternate name? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 20:24, 4 July 2017 (EDT)

LV: Created page with "Dragonicus, at least, is very clearly one of the onscreen Knights - he's the one who got his own poster image, and the one on the left-hand of the shot of the Knights forming ..."

2017-06-22T19:32:07Z

Created page with "Dragonicus, at least, is very clearly one of the onscreen Knights - he's the one who got his own poster image, and the one on the left-hand of the shot of the Knights forming ..."

New page

Dragonicus, at least, is very clearly one of the onscreen Knights - he's the one who got his own poster image, and the one on the left-hand of the shot of the Knights forming a sword canopy around the Round Table. I also think we would be being willfully ignorant if we tried to pretend the rusty old Knight whose face falls off isn't Skullitron - without that scene, we surely don't get a toy of a guy with his faceplate missing and a gross skull underneath. -[[User:LV|LV]] ([[User talk:LV|talk]]) 15:32, 22 June 2017 (EDT)