Talk:Headmaster (technology) - Revision history

Sabrblade at 05:30, 19 March 2024

2024-03-19T05:30:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 19 March 2024
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Am I the only one not comfortable with having Fortress Maximus and Scorponok listed there? I mean, yeah, those particular partners aren't available in toy form, but it still just doesn't feel like they belong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:39, 15 January 2019 (EST)		Am I the only one not comfortable with having Fortress Maximus and Scorponok listed there? I mean, yeah, those particular partners aren't available in toy form, but it still just doesn't feel like they belong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:39, 15 January 2019 (EST)
	:Maybe just change it to focus on the partner instead of the bulk? Like "[[Galen ~~Kord~~]] as the partner to [[Fortress Maximus]]"? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:41, 15 January 2019 (EST)		:Maybe just change it to focus on the partner instead of the bulk? Like "[[Galen]] as the partner to [[Fortress Maximus]]"? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:41, 15 January 2019 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Fiction only Headmasters */

2019-01-15T13:41:35Z

Fiction only Headmasters

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 15 January 2019
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Am I the only one not comfortable with having Fortress Maximus and Scorponok listed there? I mean, yeah, those particular partners aren't available in toy form, but it still just doesn't feel like they belong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:39, 15 January 2019 (EST)		Am I the only one not comfortable with having Fortress Maximus and Scorponok listed there? I mean, yeah, those particular partners aren't available in toy form, but it still just doesn't feel like they belong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:39, 15 January 2019 (EST)
			:Maybe just change it to focus on the partner instead of the bulk? Like "[[Galen Kord]] as the partner to [[Fortress Maximus]]"? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:41, 15 January 2019 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Fiction only Headmasters */ new section

2019-01-15T13:39:32Z

Fiction only Headmasters: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 15 January 2019
Line 31:		Line 31:
	i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Ranger...		i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Ranger...
	:No. Sentient Cybertronians and small organics of varying types (or other sentient Cybertronians) combine together so the smaller one forms a head. Mecha usually are sparkless robots with little to no intelligence. They're more like Mecha in Japan, but still they're a bit different. Also, sign your posts. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:07, 18 October 2013 (EDT)		:No. Sentient Cybertronians and small organics of varying types (or other sentient Cybertronians) combine together so the smaller one forms a head. Mecha usually are sparkless robots with little to no intelligence. They're more like Mecha in Japan, but still they're a bit different. Also, sign your posts. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:07, 18 October 2013 (EDT)

			== Fiction only Headmasters ==

			Am I the only one not comfortable with having Fortress Maximus and Scorponok listed there? I mean, yeah, those particular partners aren't available in toy form, but it still just doesn't feel like they belong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:39, 15 January 2019 (EST)

Escargon: /* Mecha? */

2013-10-18T21:09:36Z

Mecha?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 18 October 2013
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Is the headmaster technology a type of a mecha?		Is the headmaster technology a type of a mecha?
	i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Ranger...		i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Ranger...
	:No. Sentient Cybertronians and small organics of varying types (or other sentient Cybertronians) combine together so the smaller one forms a head. Mecha usually are sparkless robots with little to no intelligence. Also, sign your ~~post~~. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:07, 18 October 2013 (EDT)		:No. Sentient Cybertronians and small organics of varying types (or other sentient Cybertronians) combine together so the smaller one forms a head. Mecha usually are sparkless robots with little to no intelligence. They're more like Mecha in Japan, but still they're a bit different. Also, sign your posts. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:07, 18 October 2013 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Mecha? */

2013-10-18T21:07:07Z

Mecha?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 18 October 2013
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Is the headmaster technology a type of a mecha?		Is the headmaster technology a type of a mecha?
	i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Ranger...		i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Ranger...
			:No. Sentient Cybertronians and small organics of varying types (or other sentient Cybertronians) combine together so the smaller one forms a head. Mecha usually are sparkless robots with little to no intelligence. Also, sign your post. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:07, 18 October 2013 (EDT)

Hyruk: /* Mecha? */

2013-10-18T21:04:51Z

Mecha?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 18 October 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Is the headmaster technology a type of a mecha?		Is the headmaster technology a type of a mecha?
	i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power ~~Rangers....it is also listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_mecha~~...		i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Ranger...

Hyruk: /* Mecha? */ new section

2013-10-18T21:04:31Z

Mecha?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 18 October 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	In IDW, doesn't "Headmasters" refer specifically to the group of human-piloted Sunstreaker clones working for the Machination, rather than the process or the concept? In the same way, say, "Neo-Knights" doesn't refer to the concept of super-powered humans in Marvel G1, but to that specific group. Or how the "Headmaster" in Animated is a specific character rather than a concept. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 04:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)		In IDW, doesn't "Headmasters" refer specifically to the group of human-piloted Sunstreaker clones working for the Machination, rather than the process or the concept? In the same way, say, "Neo-Knights" doesn't refer to the concept of super-powered humans in Marvel G1, but to that specific group. Or how the "Headmaster" in Animated is a specific character rather than a concept. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 04:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
	:There is technology, researched by the Zarak Consortium, Scorponok, and the Machination, which produces Headmasters. As this is a fairly close analogue as to how the Headmaster technology was developed in the main G1 continuity, what are you suggesting we do here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)		:There is technology, researched by the Zarak Consortium, Scorponok, and the Machination, which produces Headmasters. As this is a fairly close analogue as to how the Headmaster technology was developed in the main G1 continuity, what are you suggesting we do here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

			== Mecha? ==

			Is the headmaster technology a type of a mecha?
			i mean its just like the `Zord` technology in Power Rangers....it is also listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_mecha...

Bluestreak7: /* move page */

2009-07-18T02:36:36Z

move page

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 18 July 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== move page ==		== move page ==

	Instead of [[Headmaster (technology)]], what about [[Headmaster (G1)]]?		Instead of [[Headmaster (technology)]], what about "Headmaster (G1)"?
	--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 05:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 05:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
	:I do not think we would be well-served making this a continuity-specific page.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)		:I do not think we would be well-served making this a continuity-specific page.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-26T22:56:30Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 26 March 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:

	In IDW, doesn't "Headmasters" refer specifically to the group of human-piloted Sunstreaker clones working for the Machination, rather than the process or the concept? In the same way, say, "Neo-Knights" doesn't refer to the concept of super-powered humans in Marvel G1, but to that specific group. Or how the "Headmaster" in Animated is a specific character rather than a concept. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 04:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)		In IDW, doesn't "Headmasters" refer specifically to the group of human-piloted Sunstreaker clones working for the Machination, rather than the process or the concept? In the same way, say, "Neo-Knights" doesn't refer to the concept of super-powered humans in Marvel G1, but to that specific group. Or how the "Headmaster" in Animated is a specific character rather than a concept. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 04:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
	:There is technology, researched by the Zarak Consortium, Scorponok, and the Machination, which produces Headmasters. As this is a fairly close analogue as to how the Headmaster technology was developed in the main G1 continuity, what are you suggesting we do here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		:There is technology, researched by the Zarak Consortium, Scorponok, and the Machination, which produces Headmasters. As this is a fairly close analogue as to how the Headmaster technology was developed in the main G1 continuity, what are you suggesting we do here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Rosicrucian: /* move page */

2008-03-17T16:22:01Z

move page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 17 March 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Instead of [[Headmaster (technology)]], what about [[Headmaster (G1)]]?		Instead of [[Headmaster (technology)]], what about [[Headmaster (G1)]]?
	--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 05:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 05:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
			:I do not think we would be well-served making this a continuity-specific page.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


	Totally,there is too much confusion with [[Headmaster (Animated)\|The character who uses it as a name]] right now.		Totally,there is too much confusion with [[Headmaster (Animated)\|The character who uses it as a name]] right now.