Talk:Hi-Q - Revision history

King Starscream: /* Redundant pages? */ new section

2016-09-30T17:38:36Z

Redundant pages?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 30 September 2016
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Maybe his name is Apex 'cause of Apex Bomber? [[User:Avalanche\|Avalanche]] ([[User talk:Avalanche\|talk]]) 00:48, 25 August 2016 (EDT)		Maybe his name is Apex 'cause of Apex Bomber? [[User:Avalanche\|Avalanche]] ([[User talk:Avalanche\|talk]]) 00:48, 25 August 2016 (EDT)

			== Redundant pages? ==

			We currently have the Titan Master Apex listed both as being Hi-Q and on his own page as Apex as if they are separate characters. Adding to that confusion is that a character named Apex showed up in ''Beast Wars: Uprising''. Are they supposed to be the same character in one continuity but not another? If so, I think we need to add a note to both pages or something. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] ([[User talk:King Starscream\|talk]]) 13:38, 30 September 2016 (EDT)

Avalanche: /* Logic behind TR name */ new section

2016-08-25T04:48:34Z

Logic behind TR name: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 25 August 2016
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)		:That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)
	::We already have it noted that every G1 Optimus Prime toy chronologically after the Action Master one can technically be considered an Hi-Q toy. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 18:24, 1 January 2011 (EST)		::We already have it noted that every G1 Optimus Prime toy chronologically after the Action Master one can technically be considered an Hi-Q toy. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 18:24, 1 January 2011 (EST)

			== Logic behind TR name ==

			Maybe his name is Apex 'cause of Apex Bomber? [[User:Avalanche\|Avalanche]] ([[User talk:Avalanche\|talk]]) 00:48, 25 August 2016 (EDT)

Foffy the Sheep at 20:51, 18 March 2016

2016-03-18T20:51:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 18 March 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:

	What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)		What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)
	: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)		: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon (substance)#Toy packaging blurb\|Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)
	::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)		::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Hi-Q (G1) to Talk:Hi-Q over redirect

2015-10-10T02:27:36Z

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Hi-Q (G1) to Talk:Hi-Q over redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:27, 10 October 2015
(No difference)

Freakertron: Freakertron moved page Talk:Hi-Q to Talk:Hi-Q (G1): There's now an Armada version.

2015-09-20T01:45:50Z

Freakertron moved page Talk:Hi-Q to Talk:Hi-Q (G1): There's now an Armada version.

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:45, 20 September 2015
(No difference)

Stevo: /* A whacky thought re: toys */

2011-01-01T23:24:52Z

A whacky thought re: toys

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 1 January 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)		Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)
	:That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)		:That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)
			::We already have it noted that every G1 Optimus Prime toy chronologically after the Action Master one can technically be considered an Hi-Q toy. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 18:24, 1 January 2011 (EST)

Blueshift at 21:03, 1 January 2011

2011-01-01T21:03:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 1 January 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)		Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)
	That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)		:That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)

Blueshift: /* A whacky thought re: toys */

2011-01-01T21:03:31Z

A whacky thought re: toys

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 1 January 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)		Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)
			That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)

Rosicrucian: /* A whacky thought re: toys */ new section

2011-01-01T21:01:29Z

A whacky thought re: toys: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 1 January 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)		: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)
	::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)		::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)

			== A whacky thought re: toys ==

			Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)

Chris McFeely: /* Japan */

2009-11-19T11:30:49Z

Japan

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 19 November 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)		What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)
	: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)		: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)
			::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 18 March 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:

	What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)		What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)
	: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)		: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon (substance)#Toy packaging blurb\|Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)
	::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)		::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 1 January 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)		Would we consider Action Master Optimus Prime to be a toy of Hi-Q?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:01, 1 January 2011 (EST)
	:That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)		:That...is a very good point. With that logic, since they were fused as one being, G2 Prime would be him as well. [[User:Blueshift\|Blueshift]] 16:03, 1 January 2011 (EST)
			::We already have it noted that every G1 Optimus Prime toy chronologically after the Action Master one can technically be considered an Hi-Q toy. [[User:Stevo\|Stevo]] 18:24, 1 January 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 19 November 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)		What kind of crazy continuity does "Nucleon Quest Super Convoy" Hi-Q come from? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 00:04, 19 November 2009 (EST)
	: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)		: Toy packaging copy continuity, I'd guess. See: [[Nucleon#Toy_packaging_blurb]] --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:07, 19 November 2009 (EST)
			::The timeline from Kiss Players placed Nucleon Quest Convoy's exploits in J-cartoon timeline, after Prime's return in "Battlestars" but before G2. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 06:30, 19 November 2009 (EST)