Talk:Hound (Movie) - Revision history

TBR: /* The Big Lebowski Captions */

2018-10-23T07:16:26Z

The Big Lebowski Captions

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 23 October 2018
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Am I the only one around here who gets these references?		Am I the only one around here who gets these references?
			:No, you're not. They're great - [[User:TBR\|TBR]] ([[User talk:TBR\|talk]]) 03:16, 23 October 2018 (EDT)

LadiesMan217: /* The Big Lebowski Captions */ new section

2018-10-23T06:14:39Z

The Big Lebowski Captions: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:14, 23 October 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:No, and again, no. The pedantry has gotten out of hand. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:48, 22 November 2014 (EST)		:No, and again, no. The pedantry has gotten out of hand. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:48, 22 November 2014 (EST)

			== The Big Lebowski Captions ==

			Am I the only one around here who gets these references?

M Sipher at 04:48, 23 November 2014

2014-11-23T04:48:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 23 November 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:Transformers has established a very broad "how different can the same character be within the same continuity family?" criterion from the very beginning with characters like Shockwave. Hound and Hound are not nearly unrelated enough to be good candidates for splitting, particularly when the old game version has such limited appearances. It's an imperfect system to be sure (see our ten billion Optimus Prime pages) but it works. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 17:33, 22 November 2014 (EST)		:Transformers has established a very broad "how different can the same character be within the same continuity family?" criterion from the very beginning with characters like Shockwave. Hound and Hound are not nearly unrelated enough to be good candidates for splitting, particularly when the old game version has such limited appearances. It's an imperfect system to be sure (see our ten billion Optimus Prime pages) but it works. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 17:33, 22 November 2014 (EST)

			:No, and again, no. The pedantry has gotten out of hand. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 23:48, 22 November 2014 (EST)

LV at 22:33, 22 November 2014

2014-11-22T22:33:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 22 November 2014
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:As in the case of Lockdown, "their personalities are kind of different" isn't really grounds to split when there's a clear conceptual link back to G1 Hound. Both are clearly based on the "Hound the green army guy" archetype. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 17:14, 22 November 2014 (EST)		:As in the case of Lockdown, "their personalities are kind of different" isn't really grounds to split when there's a clear conceptual link back to G1 Hound. Both are clearly based on the "Hound the green army guy" archetype. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 17:14, 22 November 2014 (EST)

			:Transformers has established a very broad "how different can the same character be within the same continuity family?" criterion from the very beginning with characters like Shockwave. Hound and Hound are not nearly unrelated enough to be good candidates for splitting, particularly when the old game version has such limited appearances. It's an imperfect system to be sure (see our ten billion Optimus Prime pages) but it works. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 17:33, 22 November 2014 (EST)

Jalaguy at 22:14, 22 November 2014

2014-11-22T22:14:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 22 November 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Would like you to think of it before you erase this section, but I'm asking you in the most kindest way. --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 17:03, 22 November 2014 (EST)		Would like you to think of it before you erase this section, but I'm asking you in the most kindest way. --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 17:03, 22 November 2014 (EST)

			:As in the case of Lockdown, "their personalities are kind of different" isn't really grounds to split when there's a clear conceptual link back to G1 Hound. Both are clearly based on the "Hound the green army guy" archetype. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 17:14, 22 November 2014 (EST)

TheHappyTruckShunter: /* A Split? */ new section

2014-11-22T22:03:52Z

A Split?: new section

New page

== A Split? ==

I might of been a little annoying with splitting Lockdown, but I think that there ''is'' a reason for a split. Hound has really little relation with the Transformers The Game Hound. He's different in looks, attitude and (most importantly!) personality. To begin with, TF4 Hound has a kinda middle-aged voice, attitude, and look, while TTG Hound has a very young-sounding voice. Second, TTG Hound is a not as much as a gun-crazy bot like AOE Hound is. Plus, TTG Hound is too technical for AOE Hound to withstand. :)

Plus, Hound has a bullet cigar, and dozens of guns and thousands of grenades!

Lockdown does have reasons to be split, but I think Hound has ''more'' reasons to be split. Think of it, it's almost the same thing as splitting Crosshairs.

P.S: ItsWalky, I don't want to be persistent and rude, but this wiki really likes to clump all the information on characters all together, even if those characters belong in a certain continuity, but have no relation whatsoever. Don't want to be rude.

Would like you to think of it before you erase this section, but I'm asking you in the most kindest way. --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter|talk]]) 17:03, 22 November 2014 (EST)