Talk:Hun-Grrr (SG) - Revision history

M Sipher: M Sipher moved page Talk:Hun-Grrr to Talk:Hun-Grrr (SG)

2020-01-13T03:34:39Z

M Sipher moved page Talk:Hun-Grrr to Talk:Hun-Grrr (SG)

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:34, 13 January 2020
(No difference)

Abates: /* Deleting/Moving */

2015-04-16T21:14:54Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 16 April 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Shouldn't this be at Hun-Grrr (SG), given that Hun-Grrr is an official spelling of G1 Hun-Gurrr's name? It seems to be discussed above, but if there's a conclusion there I don't see it. -- [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:59, 16 April 2015 (EDT)		Shouldn't this be at Hun-Grrr (SG), given that Hun-Grrr is an official spelling of G1 Hun-Gurrr's name? It seems to be discussed above, but if there's a conclusion there I don't see it. -- [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:59, 16 April 2015 (EDT)
			:The reasoning is that Hun-Grrr only needs a disambiguation if there is another article named "Hun-Grrr". Since there aren't any other articles (not characters) named "Hun-Grrr", this article doesn't need the disambiguation in its title. If people end up at this article when they're looking for the G1 guy, there's a link right at the top of the page anyway. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:14, 16 April 2015 (EDT)

Broadside at 20:59, 16 April 2015

2015-04-16T20:59:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 16 April 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:::::::Just for clarity's sake: if a third Hun-Grrr shows up, that would lead to a full disambig page, right? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 19:32, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::::::Just for clarity's sake: if a third Hun-Grrr shows up, that would lead to a full disambig page, right? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 19:32, 12 November 2009 (EST)

			Shouldn't this be at Hun-Grrr (SG), given that Hun-Grrr is an official spelling of G1 Hun-Gurrr's name? It seems to be discussed above, but if there's a conclusion there I don't see it. -- [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:59, 16 April 2015 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Deleting/Moving */

2009-11-13T00:32:09Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 13 November 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			:::::::Just for clarity's sake: if a third Hun-Grrr shows up, that would lead to a full disambig page, right? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 19:32, 12 November 2009 (EST)

Jeysie: /* Deleting/Moving */

2009-11-12T21:56:51Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 12 November 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Deleting/Moving */

2009-11-12T21:49:34Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 12 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)

Interrobang: /* Deleting/Moving */

2009-11-12T21:41:37Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 12 November 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::What "clarity" are you invoking here? How is redirecting this to Hun-Gurrr more "clear" than having the SG guy here? Why can't the disambig template do the job it's made for? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::What "clarity" are you invoking here? How is redirecting this to Hun-Gurrr more "clear" than having the SG guy here? Why can't the disambig template do the job it's made for? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)

Starfield: /* Deleting/Moving */

2009-11-12T21:12:37Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 12 November 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I concur as well. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 09:08, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:I concur as well. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 09:08, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	::What "clarity" are you invoking here? How is redirecting this to Hun-Gurrr more "clear" than having the SG guy here? Why can't the disambig template do the job it's made for? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::What "clarity" are you invoking here? How is redirecting this to Hun-Gurrr more "clear" than having the SG guy here? Why can't the disambig template do the job it's made for? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)

Interrobang: /* Deleting/Moving */

2009-11-12T21:07:10Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 12 November 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I agree. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:04, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:I agree. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:04, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:I concur as well. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 09:08, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:I concur as well. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 09:08, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			::What "clarity" are you invoking here? How is redirecting this to Hun-Gurrr more "clear" than having the SG guy here? Why can't the disambig template do the job it's made for? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)

Geewunling: /* Deleting/Moving */

2009-11-12T14:08:00Z

Deleting/Moving

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 12 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Considering this is a canon spelling for the G1 character, I think it's a bad idea to move the SG article here. Clarity trumps very technical accuracy, IMHO. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:59, 12 November 2009 (EST)		Considering this is a canon spelling for the G1 character, I think it's a bad idea to move the SG article here. Clarity trumps very technical accuracy, IMHO. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:59, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:I agree. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:04, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:I agree. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:04, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			:I concur as well. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 09:08, 12 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 16 April 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:::::::Just for clarity's sake: if a third Hun-Grrr shows up, that would lead to a full disambig page, right? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 19:32, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::::::Just for clarity's sake: if a third Hun-Grrr shows up, that would lead to a full disambig page, right? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 19:32, 12 November 2009 (EST)

			Shouldn't this be at Hun-Grrr (SG), given that Hun-Grrr is an official spelling of G1 Hun-Gurrr's name? It seems to be discussed above, but if there's a conclusion there I don't see it. -- [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:59, 16 April 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 13 November 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			:::::::Just for clarity's sake: if a third Hun-Grrr shows up, that would lead to a full disambig page, right? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 19:32, 12 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 12 November 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			::::::Yes, you got it in one, Khajidha. And as per our usual standards, that means the plain "Hun-Grrr" thus redirects to the more prominent character--in this case the much more well-known G1 version vs. the SG version that only shows up in a TFCC bio. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 12 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			:::::The G1 character is officially Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr or Hun-Grr depending on the source medium. Therefore, all three namespaces are already occupied. Any new character using any of those spellings would automatically need a disambig (in this case Hun-Grrr (SG)). The G1 character would then occupy namespaces Hun-Gurrr, Hun-Grrr (G1) and Hun-Grr. At least that's what I think Jeysie means. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 12 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 12 November 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::What "clarity" are you invoking here? How is redirecting this to Hun-Gurrr more "clear" than having the SG guy here? Why can't the disambig template do the job it's made for? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)		::What "clarity" are you invoking here? How is redirecting this to Hun-Gurrr more "clear" than having the SG guy here? Why can't the disambig template do the job it's made for? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)
	:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)		:::If SG Hun-Grrr is here it implies there aren't any other Hun-Grrrs. But there is. There is a G1 Hun-Grrr whose name has an alternate spelling of "Hun-Gurrr". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:12, 12 November 2009 (EST)
			::::That's what the disambig template ''is for''. "Hey, there's another dude with the same name! Go here if you want him." [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:41, 12 November 2009 (EST)