Talk:Inhumanoids - Revision history

Giggidy at 12:57, 3 June 2016

2016-06-03T12:57:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 3 June 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)		Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)
	:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''		:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''
	::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[~~Narli~~\|Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)		::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[Narly\|Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	== Major figures ==		== Major figures ==

Giggidy at 05:42, 4 April 2016

2016-04-04T05:42:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:42, 4 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)		Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)
	:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''		:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''
	::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)		::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[Narli\|Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	== Major figures ==		== Major figures ==

80.137.199.40: /* Shattered Glass */

2011-09-26T14:23:58Z

Shattered Glass

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 26 September 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	==Shattered Glass==		==Shattered Glass==
	IIRC, Trent or Sipher one addressed this on some message board or another - the Inhumanoids are plain ol' unrefined EEEEVIL, just like The Fallen. Their rottenness is a universal constant. [[Special:Contributions/168.30.245.144\|168.30.245.144]] 10:55, 14 February 2011 (EST)		IIRC, Trent or Sipher one addressed this on some message board or another - the Inhumanoids are plain ol' unrefined EEEEVIL, just like The Fallen. Their rottenness is a universal constant. [[Special:Contributions/168.30.245.144\|168.30.245.144]] 10:55, 14 February 2011 (EST)

			Could this be a case of the government just blaming the Inhumanoids, with them actually being the good guys?

168.30.245.144 at 15:55, 14 February 2011

2011-02-14T15:55:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:55, 14 February 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Since Animated Almanac 2 lists this as part of G1 cannon with the other Sunbow shows, would a small expansion of the article be out of line? Nothing huge, just say a "Major Characters" section for the important featured characters, maybe a line description of each, and a "Series Overview" with say a paragraph summary of the series plot. That would still bring it in at under the size of our Go-Bot article but give us a bit more depth. Thoughts? --[[Special:Contributions/99.111.192.89\|99.111.192.89]] 13:36, 12 November 2010 (EST)		Since Animated Almanac 2 lists this as part of G1 cannon with the other Sunbow shows, would a small expansion of the article be out of line? Nothing huge, just say a "Major Characters" section for the important featured characters, maybe a line description of each, and a "Series Overview" with say a paragraph summary of the series plot. That would still bring it in at under the size of our Go-Bot article but give us a bit more depth. Thoughts? --[[Special:Contributions/99.111.192.89\|99.111.192.89]] 13:36, 12 November 2010 (EST)

			==Shattered Glass==
			IIRC, Trent or Sipher one addressed this on some message board or another - the Inhumanoids are plain ol' unrefined EEEEVIL, just like The Fallen. Their rottenness is a universal constant. [[Special:Contributions/168.30.245.144\|168.30.245.144]] 10:55, 14 February 2011 (EST)

99.111.192.89: /* Major figures */ new section

2010-11-12T18:36:45Z

Major figures: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 12 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''		:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''
	::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)		::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)

			== Major figures ==


			Since Animated Almanac 2 lists this as part of G1 cannon with the other Sunbow shows, would a small expansion of the article be out of line? Nothing huge, just say a "Major Characters" section for the important featured characters, maybe a line description of each, and a "Series Overview" with say a paragraph summary of the series plot. That would still bring it in at under the size of our Go-Bot article but give us a bit more depth. Thoughts? --[[Special:Contributions/99.111.192.89\|99.111.192.89]] 13:36, 12 November 2010 (EST)

Chris McFeely: Talk:Inhumanoid moved to Talk:Inhumanoids

2010-03-14T00:47:13Z

Talk:Inhumanoid moved to Talk:Inhumanoids

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:47, 14 March 2010
(No difference)

Rosicrucian at 01:08, 9 December 2009

2009-12-09T01:08:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 9 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)		Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)
	:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''		:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''
			::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)

198.22.122.4 at 01:05, 9 December 2009

2009-12-09T01:05:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 9 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)		Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)
			:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)'''

Rosicrucian: New page: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--~~~~

2009-12-09T00:13:03Z

New page: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--~~~~

New page

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)