https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AJeffrey_Abrams 2026-09-13T07:44:09Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.45.3 https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=Talk:Jeffrey_Abrams&diff=282850&oldid=prev 2009-04-29T20:44:50Z

<p>New page: Okay-- this fiction section combines information about the Movie and movie novelizations. This isn&#039;t the way we normally do things, but I don&#039;t want to divide them out because; #You lose ...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Okay-- this fiction section combines information about the Movie and movie novelizations. This isn&#039;t the way we normally do things, but I don&#039;t want to divide them out because;<br /> #You lose the sequence of events<br /> #The 3 appearances between the two media are 3 &#039;&#039;distinct&#039;&#039; appearances (he&#039;s reporting on different things, from different locations, at different times of day) and the omitted report presumably still &#039;occurred&#039; in the movie-- the characters just weren&#039;t watching it.<br /> #It&#039;s kinda neat how he&#039;s peppered throughout the movie-- I&#039;m guessing he was &#039;&#039;supposed&#039;&#039; to be playing at Glen&#039;s house in an earlier version of the script, since we knwo a lot of Glen&#039;s stuff got rewritten for the actor they cast.<br /> <br /> Basically, I think the article becomes &#039;&#039;less informative&#039;&#039; (as well as a lot harder to read) if we split the fiction section-- because it scrambles the chronology of what&#039;s actually going on. Right now it&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;very&#039;&#039;&#039; clearly labeled what-comes-from-where... we&#039;re certainly not &#039;&#039;misleading&#039;&#039; the reader, and I think this is the best way to present the information pursuant with [[Help:Ignore all standards]]. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 16:44, 29 April 2009 (EDT)</div>

Derik