Talk:Jetfire (Movie) - Revision history

ThatGuy79: /* Threezero */ new section

2023-02-09T16:34:31Z

Threezero: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 9 February 2023
Line 98:		Line 98:
	He's part of the Bumblebee Autobots category, but why? I don't see anything that could link him. Unless I'm real dumb. [[User:Notirishman\|--notirishman]] ([[User talk:Notirishman\|talk]])		He's part of the Bumblebee Autobots category, but why? I don't see anything that could link him. Unless I'm real dumb. [[User:Notirishman\|--notirishman]] ([[User talk:Notirishman\|talk]])
	:Apparently he makes an alt-mode-only cameo in the prequel comic. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 01:13, 14 August 2019 (EDT)		:Apparently he makes an alt-mode-only cameo in the prequel comic. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 01:13, 14 August 2019 (EDT)

			== Threezero ==

			Does anyone have the Threezero Prime/Jetfire, or at least have proof that it's out? It still says it's unreleased, but the date on the entry says 2021, so... [[User:ThatGuy79\|ThatGuy79]] ([[User talk:ThatGuy79\|talk]]) 11:34, 9 February 2023 (EST)

Cyberlink420: /* How is he a Bumblebee Autobot? */

2019-08-14T05:13:52Z

How is he a Bumblebee Autobot?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 14 August 2019
Line 97:		Line 97:

	He's part of the Bumblebee Autobots category, but why? I don't see anything that could link him. Unless I'm real dumb. [[User:Notirishman\|--notirishman]] ([[User talk:Notirishman\|talk]])		He's part of the Bumblebee Autobots category, but why? I don't see anything that could link him. Unless I'm real dumb. [[User:Notirishman\|--notirishman]] ([[User talk:Notirishman\|talk]])
			:Apparently he makes an alt-mode-only cameo in the prequel comic. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 01:13, 14 August 2019 (EDT)

Boingus: /* How is he a Bumblebee Autobot? */ new section

2019-08-14T04:56:10Z

How is he a Bumblebee Autobot?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 14 August 2019
Line 93:		Line 93:
	==FAB Combiner==		==FAB Combiner==
	Is the Fast Action Battlers Optimus Prime combination official, and if so, where did it come from? [[User:BT383\|BT383]] ([[User talk:BT383\|talk]]) 09:48, 31 March 2015 (EDT)		Is the Fast Action Battlers Optimus Prime combination official, and if so, where did it come from? [[User:BT383\|BT383]] ([[User talk:BT383\|talk]]) 09:48, 31 March 2015 (EDT)

			== How is he a Bumblebee Autobot? ==

			He's part of the Bumblebee Autobots category, but why? I don't see anything that could link him. Unless I'm real dumb. [[User:Notirishman\|--notirishman]] ([[User talk:Notirishman\|talk]])

NexusShard17 at 03:45, 10 January 2019

2019-01-10T03:45:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 10 January 2019
Line 55:		Line 55:

	==Inclusion of novel only info in the film section==		==Inclusion of novel only info in the film section==
	The stuff with Ransack only occurs in the novel. Which is an adaptation based on an early script. Which has PLENTY of things that don't match up with the film. We use the italic approach on the Marvel UK and Animated comics because those are intended to compliment the main source (seris/us). But something that only occurs in an adaptation of an early script shouldn't be included in the main film article. For one, there's no point in the film that gives Ransack a chance to appear, for one, does this mean we need to go back to the other movie, and start doing the same for say, Jazz's article. Throw in "Megatron ripped him in half ''then ate his spark''". It's confusing the issue. If the novel needs a mention on the page, I thought we'd established with the [[Alice]] article that it should be kept separate from what occurs in the film itself. [[User:Eire]] 17.38 Jul 16 09 (UTC)		The stuff with Ransack only occurs in the novel. Which is an adaptation based on an early script. Which has PLENTY of things that don't match up with the film. We use the italic approach on the Marvel UK and Animated comics because those are intended to compliment the main source (seris/us). But something that only occurs in an adaptation of an early script shouldn't be included in the main film article. For one, there's no point in the film that gives Ransack a chance to appear, for one, does this mean we need to go back to the other movie, and start doing the same for say, Jazz's article. Throw in "Megatron ripped him in half ''then ate his spark''". It's confusing the issue. If the novel needs a mention on the page, I thought we'd established with the [[Alice (ROTF)\|Alice]] article that it should be kept separate from what occurs in the film itself. [[User:Eire]] 17.38 Jul 16 09 (UTC)
	:I'm not trying to fool anyone into thinking that event happened on film. It clearly states it only happened in the novel. I just thought that flowed better. The reader can take it into account how he wants, but if you want to separated out, I'll fix it. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:50, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		:I'm not trying to fool anyone into thinking that event happened on film. It clearly states it only happened in the novel. I just thought that flowed better. The reader can take it into account how he wants, but if you want to separated out, I'll fix it. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:50, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

Abates: Abates moved page Talk:Jetfire (ROTF) to Talk:Jetfire (Movie) without leaving a redirect

2018-09-29T23:46:18Z

Abates moved page Talk:Jetfire (ROTF) to Talk:Jetfire (Movie) without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:46, 29 September 2018
(No difference)

BT383 at 13:48, 31 March 2015

2015-03-31T13:48:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 31 March 2015
Line 90:		Line 90:
	: They were dumb. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 12:07, 20 March 2010 (EDT)		: They were dumb. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 12:07, 20 March 2010 (EDT)
	:: ah, well that makes it all ok then [[User:Cliffjumper prime\|Cliffjumper prime]] 12:17, 20 March 2010 (EDT)		:: ah, well that makes it all ok then [[User:Cliffjumper prime\|Cliffjumper prime]] 12:17, 20 March 2010 (EDT)

			==FAB Combiner==
			Is the Fast Action Battlers Optimus Prime combination official, and if so, where did it come from? [[User:BT383\|BT383]] ([[User talk:BT383\|talk]]) 09:48, 31 March 2015 (EDT)

Abates: /* Did he die? */

2014-07-11T21:19:49Z

Did he die?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 11 July 2014
Line 79:		Line 79:

	His spark core was already critically damaged, though, from Scorponok's attack. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 12:43, 10 November 2009 (EST)		His spark core was already critically damaged, though, from Scorponok's attack. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 12:43, 10 November 2009 (EST)
	: Although, given the other similarities to G1 Jetfire, [[Fire on the Mountain\|he could still come back]]. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 15:03, 8 March 2010 (EST)		: Although, given the other similarities to G1 Jetfire, [[Fire on the Mountain (episode)\|he could still come back]]. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 15:03, 8 March 2010 (EST)

	== Photon Missile Jetfire ==		== Photon Missile Jetfire ==

Iyato: /* Alt mode note/joke */

2011-03-31T19:47:02Z

Alt mode note/joke

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 31 March 2011
Line 62:		Line 62:
	I think it should be mentioned that he didn't scan another alt-mode in the movie yet he gets a high tech one whereas ransack gets a WWII fighter plane? [[Special:Contributions/96.229.162.122\|96.229.162.122]] 07:21, 30 July 2009 (EDT)		I think it should be mentioned that he didn't scan another alt-mode in the movie yet he gets a high tech one whereas ransack gets a WWII fighter plane? [[Special:Contributions/96.229.162.122\|96.229.162.122]] 07:21, 30 July 2009 (EDT)
	:It's a 1970 plane, as I remember, and he ''was'' in a museum.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 02:55, 31 July 2009 (EDT)		:It's a 1970 plane, as I remember, and he ''was'' in a museum.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 02:55, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
			::The Blackbird was first built in the early '60s. Has been around for a fair while. [[User:Iyato\|Iyato]] 15:47, 31 March 2011 (EDT)

	== Lt. Col. Brawley ==		== Lt. Col. Brawley ==

Iyato: /* Accent */

2011-03-31T19:34:25Z

Accent

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 31 March 2011
Line 48:		Line 48:
	::Just to back up Morogth, movie Jetfire's accent is definitely London based. 'Cockney' being the best term for it. I'm gonna go ahead and change it. [[User:Iyato\|Iyato]] 11:45, 31 March 2011 (EDT)		::Just to back up Morogth, movie Jetfire's accent is definitely London based. 'Cockney' being the best term for it. I'm gonna go ahead and change it. [[User:Iyato\|Iyato]] 11:45, 31 March 2011 (EDT)
	:::Yeah, I remember in an interview Mark Ryan said he was channeling his friend, none other than [[Wikipedia:Ray Winstone\|Ray Winstone]]. [[User:Alientraveller\|Alientraveller]] 11:53, 31 March 2011 (EDT)		:::Yeah, I remember in an interview Mark Ryan said he was channeling his friend, none other than [[Wikipedia:Ray Winstone\|Ray Winstone]]. [[User:Alientraveller\|Alientraveller]] 11:53, 31 March 2011 (EDT)
			:::: They don't come more Cockney than London born Winston. Have made the amendment. [[User:Iyato\|Iyato]] 15:34, 31 March 2011 (EDT)

	==Alt mode==		==Alt mode==

Alientraveller: /* Accent */

2011-03-31T15:53:14Z

Accent

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 31 March 2011
Line 47:		Line 47:

	::Just to back up Morogth, movie Jetfire's accent is definitely London based. 'Cockney' being the best term for it. I'm gonna go ahead and change it. [[User:Iyato\|Iyato]] 11:45, 31 March 2011 (EDT)		::Just to back up Morogth, movie Jetfire's accent is definitely London based. 'Cockney' being the best term for it. I'm gonna go ahead and change it. [[User:Iyato\|Iyato]] 11:45, 31 March 2011 (EDT)
			:::Yeah, I remember in an interview Mark Ryan said he was channeling his friend, none other than [[Wikipedia:Ray Winstone\|Ray Winstone]]. [[User:Alientraveller\|Alientraveller]] 11:53, 31 March 2011 (EDT)

	==Alt mode==		==Alt mode==