Talk:John Braden - Revision history

FFN at 06:42, 25 April 2010

2010-04-25T06:42:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 25 April 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:The anon seems to be the same one who commented on [http://windfarmisrecords.blogspot.com/2009/02/john-braden-19.html this post] - same style, and apparently posted by his sister. In [http://rohanclanblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/dear-family-georgia-here-well-i-dont.html this post], she credits her brother with writing the Kid Stuff storybooks. I think the Wikipedia article is incorrect and whoever wrote it was confusing two different John Bradens. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 18:33, 24 April 2010 (EDT)		:The anon seems to be the same one who commented on [http://windfarmisrecords.blogspot.com/2009/02/john-braden-19.html this post] - same style, and apparently posted by his sister. In [http://rohanclanblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/dear-family-georgia-here-well-i-dont.html this post], she credits her brother with writing the Kid Stuff storybooks. I think the Wikipedia article is incorrect and whoever wrote it was confusing two different John Bradens. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 18:33, 24 April 2010 (EDT)
			::Excellent sleuthing. It's too bad then that the Wikipedia article will continue to misinform people. Not only that, Wikipedia doesn't consider a blog to be a reliable source. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 02:42, 25 April 2010 (EDT)

Abates at 22:33, 24 April 2010

2010-04-24T22:33:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 24 April 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I happened across that Wikipedia article last night, and thought linking to it here would at least let people know there's other sources of info about Braden out there. And seeing as how I know as little as you do about which of these sources is more accurate, I really don't know what you think I ''should'' have done.--[[User:TVsGrady\|TVsGrady]] 17:48, 24 April 2010 (EDT)		:I happened across that Wikipedia article last night, and thought linking to it here would at least let people know there's other sources of info about Braden out there. And seeing as how I know as little as you do about which of these sources is more accurate, I really don't know what you think I ''should'' have done.--[[User:TVsGrady\|TVsGrady]] 17:48, 24 April 2010 (EDT)

			:The anon seems to be the same one who commented on [http://windfarmisrecords.blogspot.com/2009/02/john-braden-19.html this post] - same style, and apparently posted by his sister. In [http://rohanclanblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/dear-family-georgia-here-well-i-dont.html this post], she credits her brother with writing the Kid Stuff storybooks. I think the Wikipedia article is incorrect and whoever wrote it was confusing two different John Bradens. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 18:33, 24 April 2010 (EDT)

TVsGrady at 21:48, 24 April 2010

2010-04-24T21:48:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 24 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Okay, what the heck is going on with this article? The information added on August 3, 2009 by an anon is written in a rather poor and uncited manner. Today TVsGrady apparently didn't bother to read this article before adding a link to Braden's (uncited) Wikipedia article that contradicts several facts presented here. What do we go with? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 15:51, 24 April 2010 (EDT)		Okay, what the heck is going on with this article? The information added on August 3, 2009 by an anon is written in a rather poor and uncited manner. Today TVsGrady apparently didn't bother to read this article before adding a link to Braden's (uncited) Wikipedia article that contradicts several facts presented here. What do we go with? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 15:51, 24 April 2010 (EDT)

			:I happened across that Wikipedia article last night, and thought linking to it here would at least let people know there's other sources of info about Braden out there. And seeing as how I know as little as you do about which of these sources is more accurate, I really don't know what you think I ''should'' have done.--[[User:TVsGrady\|TVsGrady]] 17:48, 24 April 2010 (EDT)

FFN: New page: Okay, what the heck is going on with this article? The information added on August 3, 2009 by an anon is written in a rather poor and uncited manner. Today TVsGrady apparently didn't bothe...

2010-04-24T19:51:13Z

New page: Okay, what the heck is going on with this article? The information added on August 3, 2009 by an anon is written in a rather poor and uncited manner. Today TVsGrady apparently didn't bothe...

New page

Okay, what the heck is going on with this article? The information added on August 3, 2009 by an anon is written in a rather poor and uncited manner. Today TVsGrady apparently didn't bother to read this article before adding a link to Braden's (uncited) Wikipedia article that contradicts several facts presented here. What do we go with? --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 15:51, 24 April 2010 (EDT)