Talk:Knights of Unicron (band) - Revision history

Arren1234: /* Redirects */ new section

2018-01-04T02:04:26Z

Redirects: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 4 January 2018
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:It was posted on [http://www.allspark.com/content/2014/07/behind-the-music-the-volatile-history-of-the-knights-of-unicron-cybertrons-greatest-band/ The Allspark]. --[[User:Cr85747\|Cr85747]] ([[User talk:Cr85747\|talk]]) 04:36, 10 November 2014 (EST)		:It was posted on [http://www.allspark.com/content/2014/07/behind-the-music-the-volatile-history-of-the-knights-of-unicron-cybertrons-greatest-band/ The Allspark]. --[[User:Cr85747\|Cr85747]] ([[User talk:Cr85747\|talk]]) 04:36, 10 November 2014 (EST)
	::Thanks!--[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 14:24, 10 November 2014 (EST)		::Thanks!--[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 14:24, 10 November 2014 (EST)

			== Redirects ==

			All the pages on the characters link to the non existent KoU continuity page. KoU cotunity should redirect to this page.

Jimsorenson: /* CONTINUITY FAMILY */

2015-03-26T04:11:35Z

CONTINUITY FAMILY

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:11, 26 March 2015
Line 26:		Line 26:

	If only the club were to publish a story that makes a passing reference to Spandex 714.23 Epsilon, this would all be solved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:00, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		If only the club were to publish a story that makes a passing reference to Spandex 714.23 Epsilon, this would all be solved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:00, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
			:Love it!
			:This MAY have been one of the details I was supposed to address in The Complete AllSpark Almanac, I don't quite remember. I guess we'll all find out together if/when someone does the translations.If I DIDN'T, I'll throw it on the to do pile.-[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 00:11, 26 March 2015 (EDT)

	==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==		==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==

Broadside: /* CONTINUITY FAMILY */

2015-03-25T22:02:15Z

CONTINUITY FAMILY

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 25 March 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
	::With the mix of characters they have, I'd be in favour of treating them as Primax-based. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:38, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		::With the mix of characters they have, I'd be in favour of treating them as Primax-based. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:38, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
			My suggestion: List them as G1/Primax and add a note to the effect of "merch/materials suggest G1, background suggests Aligned, they're under G1 because of Legends and how we needed to put them somewhere". There's also the fact that G1 is officially several different continuities, while Aligned has the whole "squint test" thing; KoU doesn't fit under any existing interpretation of the Aligned continuity. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:02, 25 March 2015 (EDT)

	If only the club were to publish a story that makes a passing reference to Spandex 714.23 Epsilon, this would all be solved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:00, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		If only the club were to publish a story that makes a passing reference to Spandex 714.23 Epsilon, this would all be solved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:00, 25 March 2015 (EDT)

Rosicrucian: /* CONTINUITY FAMILY */

2015-03-25T22:00:09Z

CONTINUITY FAMILY

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 25 March 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
	::With the mix of characters they have, I'd be in favour of treating them as Primax-based. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:38, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		::With the mix of characters they have, I'd be in favour of treating them as Primax-based. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:38, 25 March 2015 (EDT)

			If only the club were to publish a story that makes a passing reference to Spandex 714.23 Epsilon, this would all be solved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:00, 25 March 2015 (EDT)

	==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==		==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==

Abates: /* CONTINUITY FAMILY */

2015-03-25T21:38:44Z

CONTINUITY FAMILY

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 25 March 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Well, now that they've got an event in the Legends game, I'd say they're placed in the G1 continuity family like everything else in that game. (Yes, I know, they did a Shattered Glass event but SG is still labelled as Primax and thus within the G1 family) --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:51, 19 February 2015 (EST)		Well, now that they've got an event in the Legends game, I'd say they're placed in the G1 continuity family like everything else in that game. (Yes, I know, they did a Shattered Glass event but SG is still labelled as Primax and thus within the G1 family) --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:51, 19 February 2015 (EST)
	:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
			::With the mix of characters they have, I'd be in favour of treating them as Primax-based. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:38, 25 March 2015 (EDT)

	==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==		==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==

KilMichaelMcC: /* CONTINUITY FAMILY */

2015-03-25T20:44:41Z

CONTINUITY FAMILY

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 25 March 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Well, now that they've got an event in the Legends game, I'd say they're placed in the G1 continuity family like everything else in that game. (Yes, I know, they did a Shattered Glass event but SG is still labelled as Primax and thus within the G1 family) --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:51, 19 February 2015 (EST)		Well, now that they've got an event in the Legends game, I'd say they're placed in the G1 continuity family like everything else in that game. (Yes, I know, they did a Shattered Glass event but SG is still labelled as Primax and thus within the G1 family) --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:51, 19 February 2015 (EST)
			:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)

	==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==		==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==

StarWars Jedi: StarWars Jedi moved page Talk:Knights of Unicron to Talk:Knights of Unicron (band)

2015-02-24T06:20:52Z

StarWars Jedi moved page Talk:Knights of Unicron to Talk:Knights of Unicron (band)

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:20, 24 February 2015
(No difference)

KilMichaelMcC at 22:51, 19 February 2015

2015-02-19T22:51:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 19 February 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I'm not going to get in the middle of all this, but I'll just say that when Hasbro sent Tim and me the style guides and background info and all the other resources so we could brainstorm the merch for We Love Fine's side of things, there were no designations or limitations on what continuities or universes we could draw from. When I wrote the tour list for the back of the shirt, I mostly stuck to G1 locations because I figured older G1 fans were the main target audience for this niche thing (how fucking wrong I was). When we came up with the t-shirt and print designs, Tim and I were operating under a "what if the G1 characters were rock stars" mentality. The Hasbro material borrowed from a lot of different places, so I dunno what their official word is or even if they HAVE an official word on continuity. It's a silly amalgam of everything, so I don't know what to tell you; just that Tim and I had G1 on the brain when we did our little corner of this promotion. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 15:16, 1 August 2014 (EDT)		I'm not going to get in the middle of all this, but I'll just say that when Hasbro sent Tim and me the style guides and background info and all the other resources so we could brainstorm the merch for We Love Fine's side of things, there were no designations or limitations on what continuities or universes we could draw from. When I wrote the tour list for the back of the shirt, I mostly stuck to G1 locations because I figured older G1 fans were the main target audience for this niche thing (how fucking wrong I was). When we came up with the t-shirt and print designs, Tim and I were operating under a "what if the G1 characters were rock stars" mentality. The Hasbro material borrowed from a lot of different places, so I dunno what their official word is or even if they HAVE an official word on continuity. It's a silly amalgam of everything, so I don't know what to tell you; just that Tim and I had G1 on the brain when we did our little corner of this promotion. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 15:16, 1 August 2014 (EDT)
	:I guess that's the best we'll ever get. [[User:Mimi\|Mimi]] ([[User talk:Mimi\|talk]]) 15:45, 1 August 2014 (EDT)		:I guess that's the best we'll ever get. [[User:Mimi\|Mimi]] ([[User talk:Mimi\|talk]]) 15:45, 1 August 2014 (EDT)

			Well, now that they've got an event in the Legends game, I'd say they're placed in the G1 continuity family like everything else in that game. (Yes, I know, they did a Shattered Glass event but SG is still labelled as Primax and thus within the G1 family) --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:51, 19 February 2015 (EST)

	==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==		==What came with the toys, fiction-wise?==

DrSpengler: /* What came with the toys, fiction-wise? */

2014-11-10T19:24:42Z

What came with the toys, fiction-wise?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 10 November 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:

	:It was posted on [http://www.allspark.com/content/2014/07/behind-the-music-the-volatile-history-of-the-knights-of-unicron-cybertrons-greatest-band/ The Allspark]. --[[User:Cr85747\|Cr85747]] ([[User talk:Cr85747\|talk]]) 04:36, 10 November 2014 (EST)		:It was posted on [http://www.allspark.com/content/2014/07/behind-the-music-the-volatile-history-of-the-knights-of-unicron-cybertrons-greatest-band/ The Allspark]. --[[User:Cr85747\|Cr85747]] ([[User talk:Cr85747\|talk]]) 04:36, 10 November 2014 (EST)
			::Thanks!--[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 14:24, 10 November 2014 (EST)

Cr85747 at 09:35, 10 November 2014

2014-11-10T09:35:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 10 November 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:

	I don't own the toys, so I have to ask before I write up the fiction section. Did the pamphlet with the timeline of the band's history and all the backstory come with the toys? Was it released officially? I have to know this before I summarize any information from the bible materials sent to Tim and I. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 09:34, 7 October 2014 (EDT)		I don't own the toys, so I have to ask before I write up the fiction section. Did the pamphlet with the timeline of the band's history and all the backstory come with the toys? Was it released officially? I have to know this before I summarize any information from the bible materials sent to Tim and I. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 09:34, 7 October 2014 (EDT)

			:It was posted on [http://www.allspark.com/content/2014/07/behind-the-music-the-volatile-history-of-the-knights-of-unicron-cybertrons-greatest-band/ The Allspark]. --[[User:Cr85747\|Cr85747]] ([[User talk:Cr85747\|talk]]) 04:36, 10 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 25 March 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		:Anyone have any other views on this? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
	::With the mix of characters they have, I'd be in favour of treating them as Primax-based. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:38, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		::With the mix of characters they have, I'd be in favour of treating them as Primax-based. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 17:38, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
			My suggestion: List them as G1/Primax and add a note to the effect of "merch/materials suggest G1, background suggests Aligned, they're under G1 because of Legends and how we needed to put them somewhere". There's also the fact that G1 is officially several different continuities, while Aligned has the whole "squint test" thing; KoU doesn't fit under any existing interpretation of the Aligned continuity. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:02, 25 March 2015 (EDT)

	If only the club were to publish a story that makes a passing reference to Spandex 714.23 Epsilon, this would all be solved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:00, 25 March 2015 (EDT)		If only the club were to publish a story that makes a passing reference to Spandex 714.23 Epsilon, this would all be solved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:00, 25 March 2015 (EDT)