Talk:Licensed vehicle alternate modes - Revision history

LV: /* Side Burn */

2011-11-13T02:38:36Z

Side Burn

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:38, 13 November 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
	:And let me tell you, it's borderline frustrating that Google indexes Wikia so fast that when trying to do my homework on this article (which was started just yesterday) I end up finding out that the first result of my searches is... this article.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 13:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		:And let me tell you, it's borderline frustrating that Google indexes Wikia so fast that when trying to do my homework on this article (which was started just yesterday) I end up finding out that the first result of my searches is... this article.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 13:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

			Same topic, different question: I recall hearing that the blue Side Burns released in Europe, or at least some of them, were produced late enough that they had the Viper logo tampo. I've never actually seen one. Any yeas or nays? -[[User:LV\|LV]] 21:38, 12 November 2011 (EST)

	==Star Wars==		==Star Wars==

Rosicrucian: /* Star Wars vehicles */

2010-01-08T05:02:31Z

Star Wars vehicles

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 8 January 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Why are there two sections with Star Wars vehicles in? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 23:57, 7 January 2010 (EST)		Why are there two sections with Star Wars vehicles in? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 23:57, 7 January 2010 (EST)
			:Organized by toyline. SWTF is the ''precursor'' of Crossovers, but they're two separate toylines.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:02, 8 January 2010 (EST)

Abates: /* Star Wars vehicles */

2010-01-08T04:57:21Z

Star Wars vehicles

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 8 January 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Do we really need links to each of the licensed Star Wars vehicles? We don't do this for regular cars and trucks and I do not see how there is information on, say, the "Snowspeeder" that isn't covered on Luke Skywalker's page. This is especially true when we limit ourselves into what is directly verifyable as part of the crossover media. Heck, we have to cite our sources for Galactic Empire and such. So I don't seen any useful information here other than cluttering up the Wanted Pages section. Any thoughts on this matter before I start trimming out the links? --[[User:Bluestreak7\|Bluestreak7]] 00:16, 11 August 2009 (EDT)		Do we really need links to each of the licensed Star Wars vehicles? We don't do this for regular cars and trucks and I do not see how there is information on, say, the "Snowspeeder" that isn't covered on Luke Skywalker's page. This is especially true when we limit ourselves into what is directly verifyable as part of the crossover media. Heck, we have to cite our sources for Galactic Empire and such. So I don't seen any useful information here other than cluttering up the Wanted Pages section. Any thoughts on this matter before I start trimming out the links? --[[User:Bluestreak7\|Bluestreak7]] 00:16, 11 August 2009 (EDT)

			Why are there two sections with Star Wars vehicles in? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 23:57, 7 January 2010 (EST)

Bluestreak7: /* Star Wars vehicles */ new section

2009-08-11T04:16:14Z

Star Wars vehicles: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 11 August 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:

	This article is extremely text-heavy right now, so if you guys spot photos we already have that would look good in it to illustrate points, go nuts. I don't think we need to do the toy section necessarily, but the history section could probably use a few to vary the layout.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:57, 16 June 2009 (EDT)		This article is extremely text-heavy right now, so if you guys spot photos we already have that would look good in it to illustrate points, go nuts. I don't think we need to do the toy section necessarily, but the history section could probably use a few to vary the layout.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:57, 16 June 2009 (EDT)

			== Star Wars vehicles ==

			Do we really need links to each of the licensed Star Wars vehicles? We don't do this for regular cars and trucks and I do not see how there is information on, say, the "Snowspeeder" that isn't covered on Luke Skywalker's page. This is especially true when we limit ourselves into what is directly verifyable as part of the crossover media. Heck, we have to cite our sources for Galactic Empire and such. So I don't seen any useful information here other than cluttering up the Wanted Pages section. Any thoughts on this matter before I start trimming out the links? --[[User:Bluestreak7\|Bluestreak7]] 00:16, 11 August 2009 (EDT)

Rosicrucian: /* Texty */ new section

2009-06-16T21:57:02Z

Texty: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 16 June 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
	:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

			== Texty ==

			This article is extremely text-heavy right now, so if you guys spot photos we already have that would look good in it to illustrate points, go nuts. I don't think we need to do the toy section necessarily, but the history section could probably use a few to vary the layout.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:57, 16 June 2009 (EDT)

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-27T18:46:30Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 27 March 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Star Wars==		==Star Wars==
	What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
	:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Rosicrucian: /* Side Burn */

2008-04-05T13:54:00Z

Side Burn

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 5 April 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
			:And let me tell you, it's borderline frustrating that Google indexes Wikia so fast that when trying to do my homework on this article (which was started just yesterday) I end up finding out that the first result of my searches is... this article.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 13:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

	==Star Wars==		==Star Wars==
	What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
	:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Rosicrucian: /* Star Wars */

2008-04-05T01:39:51Z

Star Wars

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 5 April 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	==Star Wars==		==Star Wars==
	What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
			:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Interrobang at 01:16, 5 April 2008

2008-04-05T01:16:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 5 April 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== Side Burn ==		== Side Burn ==

	Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

			==Star Wars==
			What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Rosicrucian: /* Side Burn */ new section

2008-04-05T00:31:36Z

Side Burn: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 5 April 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Doesn't RID Axer's box also carry licensed vehicle info? Or is it Sideways who does? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 21:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)		Doesn't RID Axer's box also carry licensed vehicle info? Or is it Sideways who does? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 21:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
	:It might well. It's a work in progress and I freely admit that my knowledge is less than complete here. It just seemed like the sort of article we ''should'' do. If I'm missing something or getting something wrong, feel free to join in.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:It might well. It's a work in progress and I freely admit that my knowledge is less than complete here. It just seemed like the sort of article we ''should'' do. If I'm missing something or getting something wrong, feel free to join in.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

			== Side Burn ==

			Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 5 April 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		Putting together some of the peculiarities of how the licensing went in RiD and I want to make sure I'm getting this right. To my recollection Side Burn's first toy was ''not'' an officially licensed Dodge Viper, and it was not until the Super Side Burn (and later Universe) deco that the viper symbol was put on the car and the Dodge trademark info molded into the toy. I'm also under the impression that ''none'' of the corresponding Car Robots figures incorporated these changes. Is this correct? Is there a particular story here that needs to be told as to why the changes got made?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
			:And let me tell you, it's borderline frustrating that Google indexes Wikia so fast that when trying to do my homework on this article (which was started just yesterday) I end up finding out that the first result of my searches is... this article.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 13:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

	==Star Wars==		==Star Wars==
	What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		What of the ''Star Wars'' Transformers? They're certainly licensed vehicle modes... just not ones that exist in reality. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
	:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:Good point. Though they're Hasbro leveraging a license they already have, they certainly qualify. I'll add them.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>