Talk:Lockdown (ROTF) - Revision history

ItsWalky: you don't read anything, do you

2021-03-11T16:44:35Z

you don't read anything, do you

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 11 March 2021
Line 79:		Line 79:
	Is it worth mentioning that since AoE came out many fans thought Lockdown utilised a sort of mass shift to get from a small car mode to a very tall robot which is why the Hasbro/Takara toys of him were hard to scale but has now been proved by the amazing third party Unique Toys figure Peru Kill to actually be possible that no mass shifting was necessary in the first place?		Is it worth mentioning that since AoE came out many fans thought Lockdown utilised a sort of mass shift to get from a small car mode to a very tall robot which is why the Hasbro/Takara toys of him were hard to scale but has now been proved by the amazing third party Unique Toys figure Peru Kill to actually be possible that no mass shifting was necessary in the first place?
	[[User:Carnivius\|Carnivius]] ([[User talk:Carnivius\|talk]]) 05:42, 22 November 2017 (EST)		[[User:Carnivius\|Carnivius]] ([[User talk:Carnivius\|talk]]) 05:42, 22 November 2017 (EST)

	~~== ROTF? ==~~

	~~Why does Lockdown have a toy from a movie he wasn't in?~~

Dingdongdude: /* ROTF? */ new section

2021-03-11T16:42:20Z

ROTF?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 11 March 2021
Line 79:		Line 79:
	Is it worth mentioning that since AoE came out many fans thought Lockdown utilised a sort of mass shift to get from a small car mode to a very tall robot which is why the Hasbro/Takara toys of him were hard to scale but has now been proved by the amazing third party Unique Toys figure Peru Kill to actually be possible that no mass shifting was necessary in the first place?		Is it worth mentioning that since AoE came out many fans thought Lockdown utilised a sort of mass shift to get from a small car mode to a very tall robot which is why the Hasbro/Takara toys of him were hard to scale but has now been proved by the amazing third party Unique Toys figure Peru Kill to actually be possible that no mass shifting was necessary in the first place?
	[[User:Carnivius\|Carnivius]] ([[User talk:Carnivius\|talk]]) 05:42, 22 November 2017 (EST)		[[User:Carnivius\|Carnivius]] ([[User talk:Carnivius\|talk]]) 05:42, 22 November 2017 (EST)

			== ROTF? ==

			Why does Lockdown have a toy from a movie he wasn't in?

NexusShard17 at 01:15, 9 August 2018

2018-08-09T01:15:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 9 August 2018
Line 38:		Line 38:
	==Should we Split?==		==Should we Split?==

	Considering Lockdown's appearance in AOE is cannon and his toy from ROTF is not, should this be split into an AOE Lockdown page and a ROTF Lockdown page? I think that there should be a split like there just was in [[Galvatron (AOE)]] from [[Galvatron (ROTF)]]. {{Unsigned\|MrGameAndToy}}		Considering Lockdown's appearance in AOE is cannon and his toy from ROTF is not, should this be split into an AOE Lockdown page and a ROTF Lockdown page? I think that there should be a split like there just was in [[Megatron (Movie)\|Galvatron (AOE)]] from [[Galvatron (ROTF)]]. {{Unsigned\|MrGameAndToy}}
	:No, because ROTF Galvatron is a one off game character, and the split happened because someone jumped the gun on merging them, and plus we don't know enough about Lockdown's personality to seperate them yet. Also sign your posts. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:31, 5 March 2014 (EST)		:No, because ROTF Galvatron is a one off game character, and the split happened because someone jumped the gun on merging them, and plus we don't know enough about Lockdown's personality to seperate them yet. Also sign your posts. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:31, 5 March 2014 (EST)
	:ROTF Lockdown is in no way 'not canon', and splitting two movie-verse bounty hunting Decepticon cars called Lockdown would be super-daft.		:ROTF Lockdown is in no way 'not canon', and splitting two movie-verse bounty hunting Decepticon cars called Lockdown would be super-daft.

Carnivius: /* Mass shifting confusion */

2017-11-22T10:42:04Z

Mass shifting confusion

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:42, 22 November 2017
Line 78:		Line 78:

	Is it worth mentioning that since AoE came out many fans thought Lockdown utilised a sort of mass shift to get from a small car mode to a very tall robot which is why the Hasbro/Takara toys of him were hard to scale but has now been proved by the amazing third party Unique Toys figure Peru Kill to actually be possible that no mass shifting was necessary in the first place?		Is it worth mentioning that since AoE came out many fans thought Lockdown utilised a sort of mass shift to get from a small car mode to a very tall robot which is why the Hasbro/Takara toys of him were hard to scale but has now been proved by the amazing third party Unique Toys figure Peru Kill to actually be possible that no mass shifting was necessary in the first place?
			[[User:Carnivius\|Carnivius]] ([[User talk:Carnivius\|talk]]) 05:42, 22 November 2017 (EST)

Carnivius: /* Mass shifting confusion */ new section

2017-11-22T10:41:26Z

Mass shifting confusion: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 22 November 2017
Line 74:		Line 74:
	[[File:KreO-LockdownArt.jpg\|right\|thumb\|100px\|Blockdown]]		[[File:KreO-LockdownArt.jpg\|right\|thumb\|100px\|Blockdown]]
	Storing this image here. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 03:03, 14 January 2017 (EST)		Storing this image here. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 03:03, 14 January 2017 (EST)

			== Mass shifting confusion ==

			Is it worth mentioning that since AoE came out many fans thought Lockdown utilised a sort of mass shift to get from a small car mode to a very tall robot which is why the Hasbro/Takara toys of him were hard to scale but has now been proved by the amazing third party Unique Toys figure Peru Kill to actually be possible that no mass shifting was necessary in the first place?

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: /* Kre-O image */ new section

2017-01-14T08:03:36Z

Kre-O image: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 14 January 2017
Line 69:		Line 69:

	...I have to assume the stock photogtaphy (For once) shows the correct transformation/assembly, given his tilted feet... You know, work with the shins swapped. [[User:Slift\|Slift]] ([[User talk:Slift\|talk]]) 23:45, 30 September 2014 (EDT)		...I have to assume the stock photogtaphy (For once) shows the correct transformation/assembly, given his tilted feet... You know, work with the shins swapped. [[User:Slift\|Slift]] ([[User talk:Slift\|talk]]) 23:45, 30 September 2014 (EDT)

			== Kre-O image ==

			[[File:KreO-LockdownArt.jpg\|right\|thumb\|100px\|Blockdown]]
			Storing this image here. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 03:03, 14 January 2017 (EST)

ItsWalky: NO

2014-11-20T20:55:43Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Seriously, we know he's going to be a bounty hunter, he's based off a bounty hunter, official release or not, his card states he's a bounty hunter.  This isn't anything close to anything offensive, so why are you so up in arms against a CORRECT categorization?  - Karhukjnsi {{unsigned|Karhukjnsi}}
 :So I take it then you ''haven't'' read the [[Help:Official info|official info help page]] that the Scoop Bastard notice links to, then? --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 02:28, 6 January 2010 (EST)
@@ Line 64: / Line 69: @@
 ...I have to assume the stock photogtaphy (For once) shows the correct transformation/assembly, given his tilted feet... You know, work with the shins swapped. [[User:Slift|Slift]] ([[User talk:Slift|talk]]) 23:45, 30 September 2014 (EDT)

Jalaguy: /* Re-Considering We Should Split */

2014-11-20T20:53:37Z

Re-Considering We Should Split

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 20 November 2014
Line 73:		Line 73:
	Just think about that, and think about how many people approve this proposal, not about how little people oppose it. :) --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 15:12, 20 November 2014 (EST)		Just think about that, and think about how many people approve this proposal, not about how little people oppose it. :) --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 15:12, 20 November 2014 (EST)
	:If you're going to try to reopen a discussion that has already been declared closed, you should at least have new arguments. These are the same points we already went over above. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:30, 20 November 2014 (EST)		:If you're going to try to reopen a discussion that has already been declared closed, you should at least have new arguments. These are the same points we already went over above. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:30, 20 November 2014 (EST)
			:Crosshairs got split off because the AOE character was essentially a 'nameslap' with no relation to the previous Crosshairs or the G1 guy he was based on. Both Lockdowns, on the other hand, are undeniably based on the ''Animated'' character. That some very specific details aren't quite the same between them is irrelevant. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 15:53, 20 November 2014 (EST)

Abates: /* Re-Considering We Should Split */

2014-11-20T20:30:30Z

Re-Considering We Should Split

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 20 November 2014
Line 72:		Line 72:

	Just think about that, and think about how many people approve this proposal, not about how little people oppose it. :) --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 15:12, 20 November 2014 (EST)		Just think about that, and think about how many people approve this proposal, not about how little people oppose it. :) --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 15:12, 20 November 2014 (EST)
			:If you're going to try to reopen a discussion that has already been declared closed, you should at least have new arguments. These are the same points we already went over above. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:30, 20 November 2014 (EST)

TheHappyTruckShunter: /* Re-Considering We Should Split */ new section

2014-11-20T20:12:28Z

Re-Considering We Should Split: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 20 November 2014
Line 64:		Line 64:

	...I have to assume the stock photogtaphy (For once) shows the correct transformation/assembly, given his tilted feet... You know, work with the shins swapped. [[User:Slift\|Slift]] ([[User talk:Slift\|talk]]) 23:45, 30 September 2014 (EDT)		...I have to assume the stock photogtaphy (For once) shows the correct transformation/assembly, given his tilted feet... You know, work with the shins swapped. [[User:Slift\|Slift]] ([[User talk:Slift\|talk]]) 23:45, 30 September 2014 (EDT)

			== Re-Considering We Should Split ==

			I want to revive the idea of splitting Lockdown, since there is a big difference in appearance, personality, and ability in Lockdown with Cyber Mission, Titan Comics Lockdown and Transformers: Age of Extinction Lockdown. If some people agree with me, give examples of differences between ROTF and AOE Lockdown.

			P.S: ItsWalky, I want you to think of this before you swallow me: If you think of it, don't you think splitting Lockdown would make sense as splitting Crosshairs is? I remember you were originally opposed to splitting Crosshairs, too. Let's analyze the difference in a summarized way: ROTF Lockdown is a only a Decepticon jerk who steals parts and participates in Decepticon activity. We could ''say he's a bounty hunter'' but if you look closely into his personality he's not. His ''toy bio'' says that. I mean in Cyber Missions, he even self-proclaims '''himself''' as a decpeticon. AOE Lockdown is an official bounty hunter, has a huge weaponry, has a gigantic SHIP, scoffs about the Autobot-Decepticon war, has visited OTHER planets, has a significantly different look, his personality is definitely much more no-nonsense and he has a much more "Don't Bother Me Unless You Pay Me For It" attitude. He has many more traits, but I want to be fast and concrete with this. CM Lockdown was more of a last-minute addition to the toyline, and Hasbro put it into Cyber Missions just to advertise him. He has very little personality too, or am I wrong? :)

			Just think about that, and think about how many people approve this proposal, not about how little people oppose it. :) --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 15:12, 20 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 20 November 2014
Line 73:		Line 73:
	Just think about that, and think about how many people approve this proposal, not about how little people oppose it. :) --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 15:12, 20 November 2014 (EST)		Just think about that, and think about how many people approve this proposal, not about how little people oppose it. :) --[[User:TheHappyTruckShunter\|TheHappyTruckShunter]] ([[User talk:TheHappyTruckShunter\|talk]]) 15:12, 20 November 2014 (EST)
	:If you're going to try to reopen a discussion that has already been declared closed, you should at least have new arguments. These are the same points we already went over above. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:30, 20 November 2014 (EST)		:If you're going to try to reopen a discussion that has already been declared closed, you should at least have new arguments. These are the same points we already went over above. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:30, 20 November 2014 (EST)
			:Crosshairs got split off because the AOE character was essentially a 'nameslap' with no relation to the previous Crosshairs or the G1 guy he was based on. Both Lockdowns, on the other hand, are undeniably based on the ''Animated'' character. That some very specific details aren't quite the same between them is irrelevant. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 15:53, 20 November 2014 (EST)