Talk:M.A.S.K. - Revision history

Saix: /* So */clean up, replaced: [[GoBots (franchise) → [[GoBots

2020-03-02T13:29:51Z

So: clean up, replaced: [[GoBots (franchise) → [[GoBots

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 2 March 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)		Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)
	:I would agree to that. In fact, I'd go further and say that we need to do something like this for all of Hasbro's in-house external (to TFs) properties. By which I mean things like: [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]], [[GoBots ~~(franchise)~~]], [[Jem]] and [[Inhumanoids]]. GoBots currently is the most informative of these (for obvious reasons). On the other hand, Inhumanoids has the realworld and in-fiction materials completely reversed from how I would propose. No, we should not cover them in detail but a basic "this is what this franchise is about" for each of them would be appropriate. I don't think we need quite as much on the truly external properties such as Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. {{unsigned\|Khajidha}}		:I would agree to that. In fact, I'd go further and say that we need to do something like this for all of Hasbro's in-house external (to TFs) properties. By which I mean things like: [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]], [[GoBots]], [[Jem]] and [[Inhumanoids]]. GoBots currently is the most informative of these (for obvious reasons). On the other hand, Inhumanoids has the realworld and in-fiction materials completely reversed from how I would propose. No, we should not cover them in detail but a basic "this is what this franchise is about" for each of them would be appropriate. I don't think we need quite as much on the truly external properties such as Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. {{unsigned\|Khajidha}}

Jalaguy at 13:53, 18 July 2013

2013-07-18T13:53:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 18 July 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)		Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)
	:I would agree to that. In fact, I'd go further and say that we need to do something like this for all of Hasbro's in-house external (to TFs) properties. By which I mean things like: [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]], [[GoBots (franchise)]], [[Jem]] and [[Inhumanoids]]. GoBots currently is the most informative of these (for obvious reasons). On the other hand, Inhumanoids has the realworld and in-fiction materials completely reversed from how I would propose. No, we should not cover them in detail but a basic "this is what this franchise is about" for each of them would be appropriate. I don't think we need quite as much on the truly external properties such as Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.		:I would agree to that. In fact, I'd go further and say that we need to do something like this for all of Hasbro's in-house external (to TFs) properties. By which I mean things like: [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]], [[GoBots (franchise)]], [[Jem]] and [[Inhumanoids]]. GoBots currently is the most informative of these (for obvious reasons). On the other hand, Inhumanoids has the realworld and in-fiction materials completely reversed from how I would propose. No, we should not cover them in detail but a basic "this is what this franchise is about" for each of them would be appropriate. I don't think we need quite as much on the truly external properties such as Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. {{unsigned\|Khajidha}}

Khajidha at 11:42, 18 July 2013

2013-07-18T11:42:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 18 July 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)		Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)
	:I would agree to that. In fact, I'd go further and say that we need to do something like this for all of Hasbro's in-house external (to TFs) properties. By which I mean things like: [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]], [[GoBots (franchise)]], [[Jem]] and [[Inhumanoids]]. GoBots currently is the most informative of these (for obvious reasons). On the other hand, Inhumanoids ~~is a strange mishmash of~~ realworld and in-fiction materials. No, we should not cover them in detail but a basic "this is what this franchise is about" for each of them would be appropriate. I don't think we need quite as much on the truly external properties such as Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.		:I would agree to that. In fact, I'd go further and say that we need to do something like this for all of Hasbro's in-house external (to TFs) properties. By which I mean things like: [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]], [[GoBots (franchise)]], [[Jem]] and [[Inhumanoids]]. GoBots currently is the most informative of these (for obvious reasons). On the other hand, Inhumanoids has the realworld and in-fiction materials completely reversed from how I would propose. No, we should not cover them in detail but a basic "this is what this franchise is about" for each of them would be appropriate. I don't think we need quite as much on the truly external properties such as Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.

Khajidha at 11:41, 18 July 2013

2013-07-18T11:41:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:41, 18 July 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)		Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)
			:I would agree to that. In fact, I'd go further and say that we need to do something like this for all of Hasbro's in-house external (to TFs) properties. By which I mean things like: [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]], [[GoBots (franchise)]], [[Jem]] and [[Inhumanoids]]. GoBots currently is the most informative of these (for obvious reasons). On the other hand, Inhumanoids is a strange mishmash of realworld and in-fiction materials. No, we should not cover them in detail but a basic "this is what this franchise is about" for each of them would be appropriate. I don't think we need quite as much on the truly external properties such as Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.

Nevermore: So

2013-07-18T10:03:38Z

New page

== So ==

Shall we elaborate a little on what the original M.A.S.K. toyline was in the Notes section? This isn't quite like Spider-Man or Star Wars, where the joke is that everyone knows the basics about them and we pretend we only know stuff we learned through Transformers-related material. I'd argue that M.A.S.K. is a little less well-known, not least due to being pretty much dead since the 1980s, unlike those other external brands that are still alive and kicking today.--[[User:Nevermore|Nevermore]] 06:03, 18 July 2013 (EDT)