Talk:Megatron (G1)/Marvel Comics continuity - Revision history

Escargon: /* Mainpic */

2021-07-07T14:36:48Z

Mainpic

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 7 July 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		::Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
			:::I extremely doubt that BW Megatron's mainpic being what the main pic of the main page was originally was the only reason why it was chosen for the cartoon section. As for the thing about "endings", G2's the one published by Marvel. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 10:36, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

Sabrblade: /* Mainpic */

2021-07-07T03:28:08Z

Mainpic

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 7 July 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	::I could get behind the composite collage pic idea if it looks good.		::I could get behind the composite collage pic idea if it looks good.
	::As for the BW Megatron comparison, the Transmetal pic is a special case in that it actually used to be the original mainpic of BW Megatron back in the early days before the "first body" rule was really nailed down (along with the fact that folks really ''really'' wanted to keep it as some kind of mainpic since it is a glorious representation of BW Megatron as a character) so a special exception from the norm was made in its case.		::As for the BW Megatron comparison, the Transmetal pic is a special case in that it actually used to be the original mainpic of BW Megatron back in the early days before the "first body" rule was really nailed down (along with the fact that folks really ''really'' wanted to keep it as some kind of mainpic since it is a glorious representation of BW Megatron as a character) so a special exception from the norm was made in its case.
	:Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		::Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

Sabrblade: /* Mainpic */

2021-07-07T03:27:55Z

Mainpic

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 7 July 2021
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:I don't disagree that Megatron's G2 time is prominent and influential, but... he's only in that body for a relatively short amount of time compared to the original comic, both US and UK. My suggestion would be someone maybe making a better composite or "collage" image (like we have for IDW Megs) of his two chief bodies (maybe even add in the Straxus clone) than that fuzzy one we had. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 21:06, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		:I don't disagree that Megatron's G2 time is prominent and influential, but... he's only in that body for a relatively short amount of time compared to the original comic, both US and UK. My suggestion would be someone maybe making a better composite or "collage" image (like we have for IDW Megs) of his two chief bodies (maybe even add in the Straxus clone) than that fuzzy one we had. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 21:06, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
	::I could get behind the composite collage pic idea if it looks good.		::I could get behind the composite collage pic idea if it looks good.
	::As for the BW Megatron comparison, the Transmetal pic is a special case in that it actually used to be the original mainpic of BW Megatron back in the early days before the "first body" rule was really nailed down (along with the fact that folks really ''really'' wanted to keep it as some kind of mainpic since it is a glorious representation of BW Megatron as a character) so a special exception from the norm was made in its case. Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		::As for the BW Megatron comparison, the Transmetal pic is a special case in that it actually used to be the original mainpic of BW Megatron back in the early days before the "first body" rule was really nailed down (along with the fact that folks really ''really'' wanted to keep it as some kind of mainpic since it is a glorious representation of BW Megatron as a character) so a special exception from the norm was made in its case.
			:Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

Dark T Zeratul: /* Mainpic */

2021-07-07T02:47:56Z

Mainpic

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:47, 7 July 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	::I could get behind the composite collage pic idea if it looks good.		::I could get behind the composite collage pic idea if it looks good.
	::As for the BW Megatron comparison, the Transmetal pic is a special case in that it actually used to be the original mainpic of BW Megatron back in the early days before the "first body" rule was really nailed down (along with the fact that folks really ''really'' wanted to keep it as some kind of mainpic since it is a glorious representation of BW Megatron as a character) so a special exception from the norm was made in its case. Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		::As for the BW Megatron comparison, the Transmetal pic is a special case in that it actually used to be the original mainpic of BW Megatron back in the early days before the "first body" rule was really nailed down (along with the fact that folks really ''really'' wanted to keep it as some kind of mainpic since it is a glorious representation of BW Megatron as a character) so a special exception from the norm was made in its case. Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
			:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

Sabrblade: /* Mainpic */

2021-07-07T01:49:17Z

Mainpic

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 7 July 2021
Line 22:		Line 22:
	4: The image is badass. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:38, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		4: The image is badass. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:38, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
	:I don't disagree that Megatron's G2 time is prominent and influential, but... he's only in that body for a relatively short amount of time compared to the original comic, both US and UK. My suggestion would be someone maybe making a better composite or "collage" image (like we have for IDW Megs) of his two chief bodies (maybe even add in the Straxus clone) than that fuzzy one we had. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 21:06, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		:I don't disagree that Megatron's G2 time is prominent and influential, but... he's only in that body for a relatively short amount of time compared to the original comic, both US and UK. My suggestion would be someone maybe making a better composite or "collage" image (like we have for IDW Megs) of his two chief bodies (maybe even add in the Straxus clone) than that fuzzy one we had. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 21:06, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
			::I could get behind the composite collage pic idea if it looks good.
			::As for the BW Megatron comparison, the Transmetal pic is a special case in that it actually used to be the original mainpic of BW Megatron back in the early days before the "first body" rule was really nailed down (along with the fact that folks really ''really'' wanted to keep it as some kind of mainpic since it is a glorious representation of BW Megatron as a character) so a special exception from the norm was made in its case. Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

Nu-Priest: /* Mainpic */

2021-07-07T01:06:24Z

Mainpic

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 7 July 2021
Line 21:		Line 21:

	4: The image is badass. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:38, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		4: The image is badass. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:38, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
			:I don't disagree that Megatron's G2 time is prominent and influential, but... he's only in that body for a relatively short amount of time compared to the original comic, both US and UK. My suggestion would be someone maybe making a better composite or "collage" image (like we have for IDW Megs) of his two chief bodies (maybe even add in the Straxus clone) than that fuzzy one we had. --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 21:06, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Mainpic */ new section

2021-07-06T23:38:48Z

Mainpic: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 6 July 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]		[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]
	:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)

			== Mainpic ==

			I am going to make an earnest argument for a G2 mainpic:

			1: Megatron's most prominent stuff to do is in that series, which does a lot to build up his relationship with Prime (honestly, thinking about it, it might be the first piece of fiction to present Prime and Megatron as having a sort of friendship.

			2: Looking towards BW Megatron's page, we have his main pic being his Transmetal body, even though it's a body he only spends for a fraction of his time in BW/BM. Plus, it adds visual interest by having a different body from Megatron's main page.

			3: It reflects what we have as Megatron's subpage opening.

			4: The image is badass. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:38, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

Abates: /* RG1's place */

2015-06-28T08:01:00Z

RG1's place

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 28 June 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::The "Generation 1" section refers ''specifically'' to the original Marvel series, not the franchise. RG1 is not a portion of it like Earthforce or the Comic-Magazin is; it's a sequel series on the same level as G2 and Classics. [[Special:Contributions/24.211.29.87\|24.211.29.87]] 11:11, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::::The "Generation 1" section refers ''specifically'' to the original Marvel series, not the franchise. RG1 is not a portion of it like Earthforce or the Comic-Magazin is; it's a sequel series on the same level as G2 and Classics. [[Special:Contributions/24.211.29.87\|24.211.29.87]] 11:11, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (2001 franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]		[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]
	:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)

Starfield: /* RG1's place */ pic

2012-07-13T23:25:12Z

RG1's place: pic

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 13 July 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
			[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]
	:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)

Starfield: /* RG1's place */

2012-07-13T18:30:14Z

RG1's place

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 13 July 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
			:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 7 July 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		::Plus, one could argue that Megatron's time in Marvel G2 is not a good representation of his entire Marvel history, the majority of which paints a more humbling depiction of the character that G2 stands in contrast to (mainly because Megatron had a new toy to sell at the time). --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		:::And, largely because of the mess that is the post-original run continuity, G2 is now like one of five different "endings" for the Marvel Comics continuity and the others don't even use that body. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul\|talk]]) 22:47, 6 July 2021 (EDT)
			:::I extremely doubt that BW Megatron's mainpic being what the main pic of the main page was originally was the only reason why it was chosen for the cartoon section. As for the thing about "endings", G2's the one published by Marvel. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 10:36, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 28 June 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::The "Generation 1" section refers ''specifically'' to the original Marvel series, not the franchise. RG1 is not a portion of it like Earthforce or the Comic-Magazin is; it's a sequel series on the same level as G2 and Classics. [[Special:Contributions/24.211.29.87\|24.211.29.87]] 11:11, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::::The "Generation 1" section refers ''specifically'' to the original Marvel series, not the franchise. RG1 is not a portion of it like Earthforce or the Comic-Magazin is; it's a sequel series on the same level as G2 and Classics. [[Special:Contributions/24.211.29.87\|24.211.29.87]] 11:11, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (2001 franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]		[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]
	:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 13 July 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
			[[Image:RG1 76-80 100pgSpectacular.jpg\|right\|thumb\|150px\|Regeneration One]]
	:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 13 July 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		:Is Regeneration One part of the Generation 1 franchise? It doesn't say "Generation 1" on the cover of the comic, it says "Regeneration One", like G2 comics said "Generation 2". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:16, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
	::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)		::No IDW series has ever said "Generation 1" on the cover, and yet [[IDW Generation 1 continuity]]. By your standard, ''[[The Transformers: Robots in Disguise]]'' is part of the [[Transformers: Robots in Disguise (franchise)\|''Robots in Disguise'' franchise]]. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude\|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 13:04, 13 July 2012 (EDT)
			:::The IDWverse is obviously not part of the "Generation 1" '''franchise''', in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there. I was just bringing up a question. Regen One continues the same numbering. The Marvel comic was not called "Generation 1" either. I think the RG1 comic is just continuing the original series. It is regenerating the original series. It ''is'' the original series. It is clearly the intention that it be all one series. I suggest putting the whole series under one header, and change it from "Marvel Generation 1 comics." Maybe "''The Transformers''/''Regeneration One'' comics." On a side note, Generation 2 was ''not'' intended to be the same series. It is the "next generation" of storytelling. The cover told us specifically that "this is not your father's Autobot." This new series is regenerating the original. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:30, 13 July 2012 (EDT)