Talk:Megatron (myth) - Revision history

Turborun at 07:17, 18 December 2017

2017-12-18T07:17:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:17, 18 December 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Megatronus ==		== Megatronus ==

	This may be a bit of a stretch, but I'll throw out here for consideration. Could there be a possible connection between this historical Megatron and [[Megatronus]] of The 13? I mean, both are terrible figures of history and bear quite similar names. Perhaps the last syllable got lost in translation of the Covenant of Primus or whatnot? (Something else to consider in a future Hasbro Q&A, maybe?) --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] 21:00, 13 July 2010 (EDT)		This may be a bit of a stretch, but I'll throw out here for consideration. Could there be a possible connection between this historical Megatron and [[The Fallen\|Megatronus]] of The 13? I mean, both are terrible figures of history and bear quite similar names. Perhaps the last syllable got lost in translation of the Covenant of Primus or whatnot? (Something else to consider in a future Hasbro Q&A, maybe?) --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] 21:00, 13 July 2010 (EDT)
	:Exodus pretty much makes Megatronus the person mentioned in the myths, and fills in a bit about the nature of the Covenant of Primus.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:01, 13 July 2010 (EDT)		:Exodus pretty much makes Megatronus the person mentioned in the myths, and fills in a bit about the nature of the Covenant of Primus.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:01, 13 July 2010 (EDT)
	::So he is, or he isn't? --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] 23:14, 20 July 2010 (EDT)		::So he is, or he isn't? --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] 23:14, 20 July 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Megatronus */ Commented out {{fact}} so page won't show up in category.

2011-01-30T01:30:49Z

Megatronus: Commented out {{fact}} so page won't show up in category.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 30 January 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::~~{{fact}}~~ - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>''citation needed''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

Starfield at 23:11, 18 January 2011

2011-01-18T23:11:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 18 January 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I don't see how you could reach that conclusion if you read this article. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:26, 31 May 2010 (EDT)		:I don't see how you could reach that conclusion if you read this article. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:26, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
	::OK, I read up some more on the Covenant, and it makes less sense than I remember. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:17, 31 May 2010 (EDT)		::OK, I read up some more on the Covenant, and it makes less sense than I remember. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:17, 31 May 2010 (EDT)


	== Megatronus ==		== Megatronus ==
Line 18:		Line 19:
	:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::::[[Hasbro Q&A/September 2010: Answers\|These]] Hasbro Q&A [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=74182 answers] make it sound like the modern continuity does not retroactively affect previous continuities. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:34, 18 January 2011 (EST)		::::::::::[[Hasbro Q&A/September 2010: Answers\|These]] Hasbro Q&A [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=74182 answers] make it sound like the modern continuity does not retroactively affect previous continuities. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:34, 18 January 2011 (EST)
			The article is called "Megatron (myth)" which is misleading. That makes it sound like he is a historical mythical character, like Megatronus. But really, this Megatron is a prophetic character, who was supposed to appear in the future. If you consider the Covenant of Primus prophecies to have been fulfilled in the Beast Wars, then "Megatron (myth)" turned out to be "Megatron (BW)". Anyway, I don't think he is similar to Megatronus at all. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:11, 18 January 2011 (EST)

	== Previous ==		== Previous ==

	On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)		On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)

Starfield: /* Megatronus */

2011-01-18T21:34:41Z

Megatronus

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 18 January 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			::::::::::[[Hasbro Q&A/September 2010: Answers\|These]] Hasbro Q&A [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=74182 answers] make it sound like the modern continuity does not retroactively affect previous continuities. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:34, 18 January 2011 (EST)

	== Previous ==		== Previous ==

	On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)		On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)

76.179.121.145: /* Previous */ new section

2011-01-18T20:56:19Z

Previous: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 18 January 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

			== Previous ==

			On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Megatronus */

2010-07-21T17:13:39Z

Megatronus

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 21 July 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Megatronus */

2010-07-21T16:57:08Z

Megatronus

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 21 July 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::{{fact}} - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::{{fact}} - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Megatronus */

2010-07-21T16:46:41Z

Megatronus

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 21 July 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::{{fact}} - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::{{fact}} - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Megatronus */

2010-07-21T16:42:16Z

Megatronus

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 21 July 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			::::::{{fact}} - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Megatronus */

2010-07-21T16:38:13Z

Megatronus

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 21 July 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::Mythical Megatron is retroactively Megatronus. The Megatron in the ''prophetic'' sections could be G1 or BW Megatron, but Exodus definitely points the tradition of warlords naming themselves Megatron towards the myth of Megatronus.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:56, 20 July 2010 (EDT)		:::Mythical Megatron is retroactively Megatronus. The Megatron in the ''prophetic'' sections could be G1 or BW Megatron, but Exodus definitely points the tradition of warlords naming themselves Megatron towards the myth of Megatronus.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:56, 20 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 30 January 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::In BW the mythical dude was named "Megatron". Just so we're clear and everything. Even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named "Megatronus". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::He may have been "Megatronus" originally, but by the time the story was written down it had been changed to Megatron. There's about 13.7 billion years of time for the story to have changed. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:38, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::~~{{fact}}~~ - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>''citation needed''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 18 January 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I don't see how you could reach that conclusion if you read this article. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:26, 31 May 2010 (EDT)		:I don't see how you could reach that conclusion if you read this article. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:26, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
	::OK, I read up some more on the Covenant, and it makes less sense than I remember. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:17, 31 May 2010 (EDT)		::OK, I read up some more on the Covenant, and it makes less sense than I remember. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 11:17, 31 May 2010 (EDT)


	== Megatronus ==		== Megatronus ==
Line 18:		Line 19:
	:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::::[[Hasbro Q&A/September 2010: Answers\|These]] Hasbro Q&A [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=74182 answers] make it sound like the modern continuity does not retroactively affect previous continuities. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:34, 18 January 2011 (EST)		::::::::::[[Hasbro Q&A/September 2010: Answers\|These]] Hasbro Q&A [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=74182 answers] make it sound like the modern continuity does not retroactively affect previous continuities. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:34, 18 January 2011 (EST)
			The article is called "Megatron (myth)" which is misleading. That makes it sound like he is a historical mythical character, like Megatronus. But really, this Megatron is a prophetic character, who was supposed to appear in the future. If you consider the Covenant of Primus prophecies to have been fulfilled in the Beast Wars, then "Megatron (myth)" turned out to be "Megatron (BW)". Anyway, I don't think he is similar to Megatronus at all. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:11, 18 January 2011 (EST)

	== Previous ==		== Previous ==

	On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)		On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 18 January 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			::::::::::[[Hasbro Q&A/September 2010: Answers\|These]] Hasbro Q&A [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=74182 answers] make it sound like the modern continuity does not retroactively affect previous continuities. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:34, 18 January 2011 (EST)

	== Previous ==		== Previous ==

	On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)		On the subject of the first question, could it have been the [[Megatron (G1)\|original Megatron]], considering that [[Megatron (BW)\|Megatron]] had ''his'' spark in his body at the time, so he could have been egotistically seeing himself as his own anscestor? (and that's not a reference to Futurama) [[Special:Contributions/76.179.121.145\|76.179.121.145]] 15:56, 18 January 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 21 July 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			:::::::::Your statement "even if he is a singularity and stuff, in at least one continuity he wasn't named 'Megatronus'" just seemed to fall into the "I know better than Hasbro" area. I was just reminding you that Hasbro can change that at any time, and demonstrating how it could be done. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:13, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 21 July 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::{{fact}} - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		::::::{{fact}} - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:42, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		:::::::I'm not stating it as a fact, I'm pointing out that your statement that he wasn't called Megatronus in BW (while technically correct) is incomplete. It is best put that "in at least one continuity he is not yet known to have been called Megatronus". --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 12:46, 21 July 2010 (EDT)
			::::::::No offense, but if you aren't stating it as fact, there is no real reason to bring it up here on the wiki. The fact is, in BW he was named "Megatron". - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:57, 21 July 2010 (EDT)