Talk:Micronauts (franchise) - Revision history

Saix at 02:05, 27 March 2025

2025-03-27T02:05:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 27 March 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{TOCclear}}~~


	== Transformers: Micronauts ==		== Transformers: Micronauts ==
	So, just to shoot a hypothetical, assuming the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing ever happens, will we then split it so we have a "Micronauts (IDW)" page, "Transformers: Micronauts" page, and a "Micronauts (franchise)" page? Because it was because of the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing that I thought it warranted a franchise page (like we have with G.I. Joe). --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 11:34, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		So, just to shoot a hypothetical, assuming the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing ever happens, will we then split it so we have a "Micronauts (IDW)" page, "Transformers: Micronauts" page, and a "Micronauts (franchise)" page? Because it was because of the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing that I thought it warranted a franchise page (like we have with G.I. Joe). --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 11:34, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

AzimuthAcolyte: AzimuthAcolyte moved page Talk:Micronauts to Talk:Micronauts (franchise): Mirroring other external franchises, already mostly franchise by volume anyway

2023-02-24T23:48:01Z

AzimuthAcolyte moved page Talk:Micronauts to Talk:Micronauts (franchise): Mirroring other external franchises, already mostly franchise by volume anyway

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:48, 24 February 2023
(No difference)

Broadside: /* Converting to franchise */

2022-07-05T22:12:56Z

Converting to franchise

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 5 July 2022
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)		Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
	:I can get behind that. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 17:33, 5 July 2022 (EDT)		:I can get behind that. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 17:33, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
			::Agreed. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:12, 5 July 2022 (EDT)

Cyberlink420 at 21:33, 5 July 2022

2022-07-05T21:33:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 5 July 2022
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)		Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
			:I can get behind that. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 17:33, 5 July 2022 (EDT)

AzimuthAcolyte: Tidying

2022-07-05T21:21:08Z

Tidying

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 5 July 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{TOCclear}}


			== Transformers: Micronauts ==
	So, just to shoot a hypothetical, assuming the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing ever happens, will we then split it so we have a "Micronauts (IDW)" page, "Transformers: Micronauts" page, and a "Micronauts (franchise)" page? Because it was because of the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing that I thought it warranted a franchise page (like we have with G.I. Joe). --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 11:34, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		So, just to shoot a hypothetical, assuming the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing ever happens, will we then split it so we have a "Micronauts (IDW)" page, "Transformers: Micronauts" page, and a "Micronauts (franchise)" page? Because it was because of the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing that I thought it warranted a franchise page (like we have with G.I. Joe). --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 11:34, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	:All we have of "Transformers: Micronauts" is a single picture. If it ever actually happens, then I'd say yes, separate "Micronauts (comic)" and a "Micronauts (franchise)" pages would be fine. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 11:37, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:All we have of "Transformers: Micronauts" is a single picture. If it ever actually happens, then I'd say yes, separate "Micronauts (comic)" and a "Micronauts (franchise)" pages would be fine. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 11:37, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
Line 17:		Line 21:

	==Converting to franchise==		==Converting to franchise==

	Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)		Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)

AzimuthAcolyte at 21:14, 5 July 2022

2022-07-05T21:14:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 5 July 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:::::::I think you're intentionally downplaying the impact of Micronus here, Chris. You say "the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information," but neglect to mention that that single panel is a full-page splash, 1/20th of the entire book, and that they spend two pages talking about him obliquely before we see him. I think its a legitimage paragraph of information. They may not change your conclusion about how to document it, but you should at least make honest arguments. There are also Transformers on the cover, which is always warranted some kind of mentioned in the past. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:50, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::::::I think you're intentionally downplaying the impact of Micronus here, Chris. You say "the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information," but neglect to mention that that single panel is a full-page splash, 1/20th of the entire book, and that they spend two pages talking about him obliquely before we see him. I think its a legitimage paragraph of information. They may not change your conclusion about how to document it, but you should at least make honest arguments. There are also Transformers on the cover, which is always warranted some kind of mentioned in the past. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:50, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

			==Converting to franchise==
			Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)

Jimsorenson: /* Micronauts: Revolution */

2016-09-28T19:50:55Z

Micronauts: Revolution

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 28 September 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	:::::::Bingo. I know this makes some people break out in hives, but this is a case where we ''are'' going to have to deal with some subjectivity in our procedures, and may force us to re-work some older articles to reflect the changing landscape. This really doesn't justify more than a note as part of a larger article. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 15:08, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::::::Bingo. I know this makes some people break out in hives, but this is a case where we ''are'' going to have to deal with some subjectivity in our procedures, and may force us to re-work some older articles to reflect the changing landscape. This really doesn't justify more than a note as part of a larger article. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 15:08, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

			:::::::I think you're intentionally downplaying the impact of Micronus here, Chris. You say "the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information," but neglect to mention that that single panel is a full-page splash, 1/20th of the entire book, and that they spend two pages talking about him obliquely before we see him. I think its a legitimage paragraph of information. They may not change your conclusion about how to document it, but you should at least make honest arguments. There are also Transformers on the cover, which is always warranted some kind of mentioned in the past. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:50, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

M Sipher: /* Micronauts: Revolution */

2016-09-28T19:08:58Z

Micronauts: Revolution

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 28 September 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
			:::::::Bingo. I know this makes some people break out in hives, but this is a case where we ''are'' going to have to deal with some subjectivity in our procedures, and may force us to re-work some older articles to reflect the changing landscape. This really doesn't justify more than a note as part of a larger article. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 15:08, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* Micronauts: Revolution */

2016-09-28T17:45:25Z

Micronauts: Revolution

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 28 September 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
			::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

Daniel Adkins: /* Micronauts: Revolution */

2016-09-28T17:40:53Z

Micronauts: Revolution

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 28 September 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::Linking nightmare? If a link to one of the issues on this article was called for, you'd simply link to the header or an anchor, no...? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 13:14, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::Linking nightmare? If a link to one of the issues on this article was called for, you'd simply link to the header or an anchor, no...? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 13:14, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
			:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 5 July 2022
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)		Given the majority of the information on this page is about the franchise as a whole anyway, how would we feel about the idea of converting this article into a more generalized franchise page following the likes of [[G.I. Joe (franchise)]] and [[M.A.S.K. (franchise)]] with an overview of the Micronauts comic title(s) as a subsection? -[[User:AzimuthAcolyte\|AzimuthAcolyte]] ([[User talk:AzimuthAcolyte\|talk]]) 17:14, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
	:I can get behind that. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 17:33, 5 July 2022 (EDT)		:I can get behind that. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 17:33, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
			::Agreed. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 18:12, 5 July 2022 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 28 September 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	:::::::Bingo. I know this makes some people break out in hives, but this is a case where we ''are'' going to have to deal with some subjectivity in our procedures, and may force us to re-work some older articles to reflect the changing landscape. This really doesn't justify more than a note as part of a larger article. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 15:08, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::::::Bingo. I know this makes some people break out in hives, but this is a case where we ''are'' going to have to deal with some subjectivity in our procedures, and may force us to re-work some older articles to reflect the changing landscape. This really doesn't justify more than a note as part of a larger article. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 15:08, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

			:::::::I think you're intentionally downplaying the impact of Micronus here, Chris. You say "the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information," but neglect to mention that that single panel is a full-page splash, 1/20th of the entire book, and that they spend two pages talking about him obliquely before we see him. I think its a legitimage paragraph of information. They may not change your conclusion about how to document it, but you should at least make honest arguments. There are also Transformers on the cover, which is always warranted some kind of mentioned in the past. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:50, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 28 September 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
			:::::::Bingo. I know this makes some people break out in hives, but this is a case where we ''are'' going to have to deal with some subjectivity in our procedures, and may force us to re-work some older articles to reflect the changing landscape. This really doesn't justify more than a note as part of a larger article. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 15:08, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 28 September 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
			::::::I have said this on the AllSpark and I will say it again here - the Transformer relevance of ''Microanuts: Revolution'' is a single panel, and ''literal sentence's'' worth of information. ''And'', that information ''will'', with 100% certainty, be reiterated multiple times in multiple other comics featuring Transformers properly as part of Revolution that can and will be linked to over and over again. The only relevance this particular comic will have will be to say "this is where it was indicated first, in one panel and one line of dialogue." - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:45, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 28 September 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::Linking nightmare? If a link to one of the issues on this article was called for, you'd simply link to the header or an anchor, no...? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 13:14, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		:::Linking nightmare? If a link to one of the issues on this article was called for, you'd simply link to the header or an anchor, no...? [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 13:14, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
	::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)		::::I suppose I'm exaggerating, but it'd be annoying having to remember which issue is good enough for an article or not. The wind doesn't seem to be blowing in my favor about this, so meh. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 13:20, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
			:::::I'm with Saix on this. The first appearance of Micronus Prime in the IDW universe is a big enough deal to give it a page. Especially considering that, moving forward, these books are going to be in the Transformers universe. What if Micronus ends up being a big deal in later Micronauts issues? To be frank, it seems like a lot of people are just resistant to the idea of the shared universe, and so are resistant to more of it's inclusion on this wiki. In a weird way, these ARE Transformers characters now. I'm not saying we need to include everything, but when an actual Transformers character appears and is pretty relevant to the plot? Yeah. --[[User:DannyBoy\|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy\|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (EDT)