Talk:Micronus Prime - Revision history

Daytonjhammon at 20:21, 9 July 2025

2025-07-09T20:21:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 9 July 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

			==Same joke on two different captions==
			I just noticed that there are two photos with the same "Tony Stark built this in a cave, with a box of scraps" joke as the caption: one for the RID 2015 incarnation, and one for the ''Age of the Primes'' toyline. Kinda seems redundant to have the same joke twice? I think the joke fits better with the ''Age of the Primes'' toy photo, but since I don't have any replacement suggestions in mind for either photo, I thought I'd at least bring it up here and let someone else take charge of making a potential caption change. -- [[User:Daytonjhammon\|Daytonjhammon]] ([[User talk:Daytonjhammon\|talk]]) 16:21, 9 July 2025 (EDT)

Khajidha: Undo revision 1232937 by Arren1234 (talk)not a chat room

2018-01-01T18:50:40Z

Undo revision 1232937 by Arren1234 (talk)not a chat room

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 1 January 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

	~~== Symbol? ==~~

	~~He should have his on symbol separate from minicon.~~

Arren1234: /* Symbol? */ new section

2018-01-01T17:38:40Z

Symbol?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 1 January 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

			== Symbol? ==

			He should have his on symbol separate from minicon.

Saix at 14:40, 11 December 2015

2015-12-11T14:40:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 11 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Split? ==		== Split? ==
	As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into [[Micronus Prime (Prime)]] and [[Micronus Prime (Timelines)]]? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into Micronus Prime (Prime) and Micronus Prime (Timelines)? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* Split? */

2015-07-02T21:01:26Z

Split?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 2 July 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

M Sipher at 20:52, 2 July 2015

2015-07-02T20:52:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 2 July 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* Split? */

2015-07-02T17:06:50Z

Split?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 2 July 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into [[Micronus Prime (Prime)]] and [[Micronus Prime (Timelines)]]? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into [[Micronus Prime (Prime)]] and [[Micronus Prime (Timelines)]]? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

Broadside: /* Split? */

2015-07-02T17:04:54Z

Split?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 2 July 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Split? ==		== Split? ==
	As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into [[Micronus Prime (Prime)]] and [[Micronus Prime (Timelines)]]? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into [[Micronus Prime (Prime)]] and [[Micronus Prime (Timelines)]]? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: Created page with "== Split? == As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant develop..."

2015-07-02T16:59:36Z

Created page with "== Split? == As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant develop..."

New page

== Split? ==
As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into [[Micronus Prime (Prime)]] and [[Micronus Prime (Timelines)]]? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 11 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Split? ==		== Split? ==
	As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into [[Micronus Prime (Prime)]] and [[Micronus Prime (Timelines)]]? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into Micronus Prime (Prime) and Micronus Prime (Timelines)? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 2 July 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			::::I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 2 July 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. [[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at ''merging'' these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			:::Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean ''anything'' of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)