Talk:Monsterous - Revision history

Giggidy: /* Merging Monsterous */

2015-10-26T22:08:24Z

Merging Monsterous

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 26 October 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
	::::I'm fine with either. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		::::I'm fine with either. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
			:::::Merge seems like a good idea. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:08, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Ascendron: /* Merging Monsterous */

2015-10-26T20:49:40Z

Merging Monsterous

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 26 October 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)		::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)
	:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
			::::I'm fine with either. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Chris McFeely at 20:36, 26 October 2015

2015-10-26T20:36:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 26 October 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
	::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)		::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)
			:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Charles RB at 20:27, 26 October 2015

2015-10-26T20:27:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 26 October 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)		Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)
	:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
			::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)

Ascendron: /* Merging Monsterous */

2015-10-26T20:10:53Z

Merging Monsterous

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 26 October 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)		Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)
			:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Charles RB at 20:09, 26 October 2015

2015-10-26T20:09:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 26 October 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Given that the actual name of the combiner was "Monsterous" (see the packaging picture here http://counter-x.net/gobots/reviews/combiners/monsterous.html) and this was also the spelling used in CyKill's post on 16 October when he gave us the origin of these characters, shouldn't we move this page to [[Monsterous]]?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 11:13, 18 October 2015 (EDT)		Given that the actual name of the combiner was "Monsterous" (see the packaging picture here http://counter-x.net/gobots/reviews/combiners/monsterous.html) and this was also the spelling used in CyKill's post on 16 October when he gave us the origin of these characters, shouldn't we move this page to [[Monsterous]]?--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 11:13, 18 October 2015 (EDT)

			==Merging Monsterous==

			Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)

Giggidy: Giggidy moved page Talk:Monstrous to Talk:Monsterous: My bad

2015-10-18T15:24:16Z

Giggidy moved page Talk:Monstrous to Talk:Monsterous: My bad

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:24, 18 October 2015
(No difference)

Khajidha: /* Spelling */ new section

2015-10-18T15:13:42Z

Spelling: new section

New page

== Spelling ==

Given that the actual name of the combiner was "Monsterous" (see the packaging picture here http://counter-x.net/gobots/reviews/combiners/monsterous.html) and this was also the spelling used in CyKill's post on 16 October when he gave us the origin of these characters, shouldn't we move this page to [[Monsterous]]?--[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 11:13, 18 October 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 26 October 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
	::::I'm fine with either. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		::::I'm fine with either. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
			:::::Merge seems like a good idea. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:08, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 26 October 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)		::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)
	:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
			::::I'm fine with either. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 26 October 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
	::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)		::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)
			:::Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 26 October 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)		Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)
	:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)		:In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
			::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Charles RB\|Charles RB]] ([[User talk:Charles RB\|talk]]) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)