Talk:More than Meets the Eye issue 13 - Revision history

Detour at 11:48, 7 February 2013

2013-02-07T11:48:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 7 February 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)		:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the [[The Transformers (IDW)\|issue-listing box]] having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)		::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the [[The Transformers (IDW)\|issue-listing box]] having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)
			:::::Makes sense. I guess we could try and get a discussion on what the standard should be for multiple stories within one issue? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 06:48, 7 February 2013 (EST)

Chris McFeely at 09:54, 7 February 2013

2013-02-07T09:54:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 7 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)		::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)		:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the issue-listing box having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)		::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the [[The Transformers (IDW)\|issue-listing box]] having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)

Chris McFeely at 09:50, 7 February 2013

2013-02-07T09:50:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 7 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)		::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)		:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)
			::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the issue-listing box having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)

Jeysie at 03:38, 7 February 2013

2013-02-07T03:38:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 7 February 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Is there anything left to do? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:52, 6 February 2013 (EST)		: Is there anything left to do? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:52, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)		::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)
			:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)

Detour at 03:21, 7 February 2013

2013-02-07T03:21:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 7 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, what are you gonna do with this page, McFeely? --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 21:44, 6 February 2013 (EST)		So, what are you gonna do with this page, McFeely? --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 21:44, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	: Is there anything left to do? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:52, 6 February 2013 (EST)		: Is there anything left to do? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:52, 6 February 2013 (EST)
			::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)

ItsWalky at 02:52, 7 February 2013

2013-02-07T02:52:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 7 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, what are you gonna do with this page, McFeely? --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 21:44, 6 February 2013 (EST)		So, what are you gonna do with this page, McFeely? --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 21:44, 6 February 2013 (EST)
			: Is there anything left to do? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:52, 6 February 2013 (EST)

Lonegamer78: Created page with "So, what are you gonna do with this page, McFeely? --~~~~"

2013-02-07T02:44:01Z

Created page with "So, what are you gonna do with this page, McFeely? --~~~~"

New page

So, what are you gonna do with this page, McFeely? --[[User:Lonegamer78|Lonegamer78]] 21:44, 6 February 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 7 February 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)		:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the [[The Transformers (IDW)\|issue-listing box]] having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)		::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the [[The Transformers (IDW)\|issue-listing box]] having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)
			:::::Makes sense. I guess we could try and get a discussion on what the standard should be for multiple stories within one issue? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 06:48, 7 February 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 7 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)		::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)		:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the issue-listing box having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)		::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the [[The Transformers (IDW)\|issue-listing box]] having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 7 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)		::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)		:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)
			::::Eh, I chose to treat it like we do the UK annuals. A page for the actual publication, so that there would be a singular page that issue-boxes like that on the main MTMTE page could link to, and then pages for the stories contained within it. I admit to doing so based on one particular annoyance I noticed recently when writing about [[Chaos (IDW)\|Chaos]]—the way we've given the two stories in [[Space Opera—Final Tableaux: Orphans of the Helix\|issue #21]] an article each, but leaving us with no page for the issue itself, resulting the issue-listing box having to do a dumb "story a/story b" sub-link, throwing off its visual consistency. Plus, I think it's more orderly that way - I never liked the doubled-up notes and character boxes we had on The Arrival or Coda. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 04:50, 7 February 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 7 February 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Is there anything left to do? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:52, 6 February 2013 (EST)		: Is there anything left to do? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 21:52, 6 February 2013 (EST)
	::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)		::Do we really need a separate article for the backup story? With G2 and Coda we usually kept the two tales on the same issue article... --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 22:21, 6 February 2013 (EST)
			:::There's also The Arrival. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 22:38, 6 February 2013 (EST)