Talk:Movie continuity family - Revision history

Locoman: Grum moved page Talk:Movie continuity to Talk:Movie continuity family

2021-04-02T04:10:08Z

Grum moved page Talk:Movie continuity to Talk:Movie continuity family

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:10, 2 April 2021
(No difference)

Starfield: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-28T00:58:32Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 28 June 2013
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	::::::I think another reason why it exists is to put it in the Things that don't exist category, cause of the Sector Seven ARG. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 20:34, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::::::I think another reason why it exists is to put it in the Things that don't exist category, cause of the Sector Seven ARG. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 20:34, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			:::::::Is ''that'' why? Here I assumed "movie continuity" was in the "things that don't exist" category as some unsubtle commentary on the bayverse. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:58, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-28T00:34:50Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 28 June 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	::::::I think another reason why it exists is to put it in the Things that don't exist category, cause of the Sector Seven ARG.		::::::I think another reason why it exists is to put it in the Things that don't exist category, cause of the Sector Seven ARG. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 20:34, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-28T00:34:32Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 28 June 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			::::::I think another reason why it exists is to put it in the Things that don't exist category, cause of the Sector Seven ARG.

Starfield: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-28T00:22:20Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 28 June 2013
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

Jalaguy: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-27T23:01:39Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 27 June 2013
Line 27:		Line 27:
	::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-27T22:52:18Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 27 June 2013
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

KrytenKoro: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-27T21:24:28Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 27 June 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-27T20:27:41Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 27 June 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:

	The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff.		:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Live-action film series */

2013-06-27T20:25:07Z

Live-action film series

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 27 June 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:

	The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 28 June 2013
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	::::::I think another reason why it exists is to put it in the Things that don't exist category, cause of the Sector Seven ARG. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 20:34, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::::::I think another reason why it exists is to put it in the Things that don't exist category, cause of the Sector Seven ARG. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 20:34, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			:::::::Is ''that'' why? Here I assumed "movie continuity" was in the "things that don't exist" category as some unsubtle commentary on the bayverse. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:58, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 28 June 2013
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			:::::The [[live-action film series]] page says in a couple of places that it is a continuity family, and it is listed as a continuity family on the [[continuity family]] page. Maybe that should change and have it be a page for just the films. ''Animated'' is similar in that it has various secondary fictions that are in continuity with the cartoon but not necessary with each other. It doesn't have a continuity family page, but it has a [[Animated cartoon continuity\|continuity page]] where it explains how the splinter timelines relate to each other. I like how that is organized. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 20:22, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 27 June 2013
Line 27:		Line 27:
	::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			::::I wouldn't say that [[live-action film series]] is a continuity family page. It's a page for the film series. If it were TV rather theatrical, the films would be the episode pages and that'd be the overall series article. And whilst most everything is in continuity with the films, that doesn't mean they're all in continuity with each other. For instance, both [[movie timeline]] and [[Titan Magazines movie timeline]] exist. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 19:01, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 27 June 2013
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			:::Interesting point. The other page is the continuity family page. This page is the continuity page. If they are exactly the same, then the "live-action film series" continuity family is a family of just one continuity—the "movie continuity." If that is true, maybe this is one instance where there doesn't need to be a designated continuity family, since you can't really have a family of one. Are we sure it is true? Is there anything in the "live-action film continuity family" that isn't in continuity with the movies? Cyber Missions maybe? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 18:52, 27 June 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 27 June 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		The contents of this article appear to be mostly redundant to that mentioned above. Perhaps a merge is in order?[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 16:14, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
	:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)		:No, that page is for the movies themselves. This page is for the movies and all related comics, games, toys, and stuff. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 16:27, 27 June 2013 (EDT)
			::I get what the pages are ''for'', I'm saying that the actual content, the words in the article, are mostly the same, even though that other article has a link to this one saying "See here for more info". What I mean is, I'm not seeing enough "more info" to justify that.[[User:KrytenKoro\|KrytenKoro]] 17:24, 27 June 2013 (EDT)