Talk:Multiversal singularity - Revision history

Primestar3 at 19:51, 25 May 2017

2017-05-25T19:51:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:51, 25 May 2017
Line 69:		Line 69:
	== RG1 ==		== RG1 ==

	It's worth mentioning RG1 also used this concept.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 15:54, 7 April 2017 (EDT)		It's worth mentioning that RG1 also used this concept.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 15:54, 7 April 2017 (EDT)

Primestar3: /* RG1 */ new section

2017-04-07T19:54:07Z

RG1: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 7 April 2017
Line 66:		Line 66:
	:I've always been of the opinion that even if they were separated, they should all be kept together, like the sacred implements or Energon. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (EST)		:I've always been of the opinion that even if they were separated, they should all be kept together, like the sacred implements or Energon. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (EST)
	::There is a big discussion about this on community portal. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:16, 8 November 2015 (EST)		::There is a big discussion about this on community portal. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:16, 8 November 2015 (EST)

			== RG1 ==

			It's worth mentioning RG1 also used this concept.--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 15:54, 7 April 2017 (EDT)

Giggidy: /* no more singularities */

2015-11-09T01:16:12Z

no more singularities

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 9 November 2015
Line 65:		Line 65:
	Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core]] of Cybertron. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)		Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core]] of Cybertron. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)
	:I've always been of the opinion that even if they were separated, they should all be kept together, like the sacred implements or Energon. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (EST)		:I've always been of the opinion that even if they were separated, they should all be kept together, like the sacred implements or Energon. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (EST)
			::There is a big discussion about this on community portal. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:16, 8 November 2015 (EST)

Escargon: /* no more singularities */

2015-11-09T01:05:59Z

no more singularities

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 9 November 2015
Line 64:		Line 64:

	Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core]] of Cybertron. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)		Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core]] of Cybertron. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)
			:I've always been of the opinion that even if they were separated, they should all be kept together, like the sacred implements or Energon. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (EST)

Freakertron: /* no more singularities */

2015-11-09T01:03:09Z

no more singularities

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 9 November 2015
Line 63:		Line 63:
	== no more singularities ==		== no more singularities ==

	Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core of Cybertron]]. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)		Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core]] of Cybertron. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)

Freakertron: /* no more singularities */ new section

2015-11-09T01:01:20Z

no more singularities: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 9 November 2015
Line 60:		Line 60:
	Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)		Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)
	:Thoughts? I considered trying to just update the article for the AVP stuff myself, but I started looking it over and my eyes kinda glazed over trying to figure out how to tackle it. ''Something'' needs to be updated on this page, though.--[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:45, 12 August 2015 (EDT)		:Thoughts? I considered trying to just update the article for the AVP stuff myself, but I started looking it over and my eyes kinda glazed over trying to figure out how to tackle it. ''Something'' needs to be updated on this page, though.--[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:45, 12 August 2015 (EDT)

			== no more singularities ==

			Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core of Cybertron]]. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)

KilMichaelMcC: /* Ask Vector Prime */

2015-08-12T17:45:16Z

Ask Vector Prime

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 12 August 2015
Line 59:		Line 59:
	:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)		Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)
			:Thoughts? I considered trying to just update the article for the AVP stuff myself, but I started looking it over and my eyes kinda glazed over trying to figure out how to tackle it. ''Something'' needs to be updated on this page, though.--[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:45, 12 August 2015 (EDT)

KilMichaelMcC: /* Ask Vector Prime */

2015-08-11T21:36:56Z

Ask Vector Prime

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 11 August 2015
Line 58:		Line 58:
	::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: /* Ask Vector Prime */

2015-07-02T18:30:47Z

Ask Vector Prime

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 2 July 2015
Line 57:		Line 57:
	:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

KilMichaelMcC: /* Ask Vector Prime */

2015-07-02T18:07:58Z

Ask Vector Prime

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 2 July 2015
Line 56:		Line 56:
	So, uh, none of the Ask Vector Prime stuff, in which the base definition of multiversal singularity is totally upended, has been added to this page yet? Is there a deliberate choice somewhere holding off on this, or is just no one willing to be deal with it yet? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:57, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		So, uh, none of the Ask Vector Prime stuff, in which the base definition of multiversal singularity is totally upended, has been added to this page yet? Is there a deliberate choice somewhere holding off on this, or is just no one willing to be deal with it yet? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:57, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 9 November 2015
Line 65:		Line 65:
	Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core]] of Cybertron. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)		Now that there are no longer any multiversal singularities, are we going to split everything or leave everything the way it is? We already have separate pages for the Aligned Thirteen, are we going to have separate pages for the Aligned Primus and Unicron? Aligned Primus kinda already has a separate page as the [[Core]] of Cybertron. Instead of there being just one Unicron page, will there be a Unicron (G1), Unicron (RID), Unicron (Armada) etc. Or are we just gonna save ourselves the trouble and just keep everything the way it is? [[User:Freakertron\|Freakertron]] ([[User talk:Freakertron\|talk]]) 20:01, 8 November 2015 (EST)
	:I've always been of the opinion that even if they were separated, they should all be kept together, like the sacred implements or Energon. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (EST)		:I've always been of the opinion that even if they were separated, they should all be kept together, like the sacred implements or Energon. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (EST)
			::There is a big discussion about this on community portal. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:16, 8 November 2015 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 12 August 2015
Line 59:		Line 59:
	:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)		Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)
			:Thoughts? I considered trying to just update the article for the AVP stuff myself, but I started looking it over and my eyes kinda glazed over trying to figure out how to tackle it. ''Something'' needs to be updated on this page, though.--[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:45, 12 August 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 11 August 2015
Line 58:		Line 58:
	::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			Okay, so, if this article is being held off on or whatever, perhaps some kind of "changes pending" template could be created? Or some other sort of note added? Because seriously, ''major'' changes to the multiversal singularity concept have been made yet this article hasn't been updated to reflect them. The last edit was back in Februrary and just added that quote, which isn't entirely accurate any more given that non-singularity Unicrons are a thing now. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 2 July 2015
Line 57:		Line 57:
	:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			:::For my part I haven't been doing anything with this page because I tend to focus on events while this page is more about scientific properties than events, if you get what I mean. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 2 July 2015
Line 56:		Line 56:
	So, uh, none of the Ask Vector Prime stuff, in which the base definition of multiversal singularity is totally upended, has been added to this page yet? Is there a deliberate choice somewhere holding off on this, or is just no one willing to be deal with it yet? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:57, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		So, uh, none of the Ask Vector Prime stuff, in which the base definition of multiversal singularity is totally upended, has been added to this page yet? Is there a deliberate choice somewhere holding off on this, or is just no one willing to be deal with it yet? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 13:57, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
	:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)		:Jim has intimated there's something else to come out of the TFCC this year that's going to fundamentally alter singularities, so I think we're waiting on that. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 14:02, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
			::Okay, but Singularities have ''already'' been fundamentally altered. Non-singularity Unicrons and Primus-free Cybertrons now exist, for example. I checked this article today specifically to see how it was documenting that stuff, and was surprised to see no edits have been made to it since back in Feburary. Ask VP/Sideways stuff is being added to other articles, but not this one, and I am finding that odd. Note that I am not at all the person to make any such additions, since my brain's reaction to it all is just "HAAHAHAHAHAHAH why" and don't at all know what to make of it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (EDT)