Talk:Nomadic invader - Revision history

Geewunling: headdesk

2011-01-19T20:30:55Z

*headdesk*

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 19 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a stretch, or something out of left field, and we should probably avoid that sort of thing here. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:30, 19 January 2011 (EST)		I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a stretch, or something out of left field, and we should probably avoid that sort of thing here. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:30, 19 January 2011 (EST)
	:I apologize if I did wrong, but I went by practices I thought accepted. There was speculation of Ferak being a hunter-~~seeker skyship~~ before it was made official and I recall having seen more often that certain similarities could be noted (I also thought of Agent 113 being Punch before the addition of the miniseries info). I did add "coincidental" to make it more clear. I favour keeping the note (in more thorough !coincidence! state, like Killzone's Alignment note before AAII), because I have always thought the story about the nomadic invaders was plain weird and unlike all else we knew about G1 Cybertronian society (or its interaction with other species). When I read about the Maraudicons, the nomadic invaders was the very first thing I thought off. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:08, 19 January 2011 (EST)		:I apologize if I did wrong, but I went by practices I thought accepted. There was speculation of Ferak being a Airborne hunter squad-dude before it was made official and I recall having seen more often that certain similarities could be noted (I also thought of Agent 113 being Punch before the addition of the miniseries info). I did add "coincidental" to make it more clear. I favour keeping the note (in more thorough !coincidence! state, like Killzone's Alignment note before AAII), because I have always thought the story about the nomadic invaders was plain weird and unlike all else we knew about G1 Cybertronian society (or its interaction with other species). When I read about the Maraudicons, the nomadic invaders was the very first thing I thought off. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:08, 19 January 2011 (EST)

Geewunling at 20:08, 19 January 2011

2011-01-19T20:08:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 19 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a stretch, or something out of left field, and we should probably avoid that sort of thing here. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:30, 19 January 2011 (EST)		I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a stretch, or something out of left field, and we should probably avoid that sort of thing here. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:30, 19 January 2011 (EST)
			:I apologize if I did wrong, but I went by practices I thought accepted. There was speculation of Ferak being a hunter-seeker skyship before it was made official and I recall having seen more often that certain similarities could be noted (I also thought of Agent 113 being Punch before the addition of the miniseries info). I did add "coincidental" to make it more clear. I favour keeping the note (in more thorough !coincidence! state, like Killzone's Alignment note before AAII), because I have always thought the story about the nomadic invaders was plain weird and unlike all else we knew about G1 Cybertronian society (or its interaction with other species). When I read about the Maraudicons, the nomadic invaders was the very first thing I thought off. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:08, 19 January 2011 (EST)

ItsWalky: New page: I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a str...

2011-01-19T19:30:37Z

New page: I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a str...

New page

I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a stretch, or something out of left field, and we should probably avoid that sort of thing here. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 14:30, 19 January 2011 (EST)

Talk:Nomadic invader - Revision history

Geewunling: *headdesk*

Geewunling at 20:08, 19 January 2011

ItsWalky: New page: I think it's a little too speculation-y to point to a group created a decade later for an unrelated continuity as a possible identity for the nomadic invaders. It feels like kind of a str...

Geewunling: headdesk