Talk:Omega Sentinel (Animated) - Revision history

M Sipher: Why Longrack?

2010-09-19T16:19:18Z

Why Longrack?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 19 September 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	The article says it needs a picture so why not throw in a pic of Omega Supreme? He was an Omega Sentinel wasn't he?[[User:Omegatron\|Omegatron]] 13:56, 28 August 2010 (EDT)		The article says it needs a picture so why not throw in a pic of Omega Supreme? He was an Omega Sentinel wasn't he?[[User:Omegatron\|Omegatron]] 13:56, 28 August 2010 (EDT)

			==Why Longrack?==
			Probably because of "[[Force of Habit]]". --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 12:19, 19 September 2010 (EDT)

Omegatron: /* Picture */ new section

2010-08-28T17:56:55Z

Picture: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 28 August 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	So do you think those "Guardian Robots" in the [[Great War (Animated)\|history vid]] are actually Omega Sentinels? What else could they be? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 01:16, 17 July 2010 (EDT)		So do you think those "Guardian Robots" in the [[Great War (Animated)\|history vid]] are actually Omega Sentinels? What else could they be? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 01:16, 17 July 2010 (EDT)
	:So none of the Omega Sentinels look like the guys from the historical archive. Too bad. That would have been awesome. I still think it is unlikely the Autobots had another set of giants. Could there have been more than just the 12 Sentinels named in the Almanac II? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 19:22, 17 July 2010 (EDT)		:So none of the Omega Sentinels look like the guys from the historical archive. Too bad. That would have been awesome. I still think it is unlikely the Autobots had another set of giants. Could there have been more than just the 12 Sentinels named in the Almanac II? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 19:22, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

			== Picture ==

			The article says it needs a picture so why not throw in a pic of Omega Supreme? He was an Omega Sentinel wasn't he?[[User:Omegatron\|Omegatron]] 13:56, 28 August 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* History vid appearance? */

2010-07-17T23:22:26Z

History vid appearance?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 17 July 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	So do you think those "Guardian Robots" in the [[Great War (Animated)\|history vid]] are actually Omega Sentinels? What else could they be? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 01:16, 17 July 2010 (EDT)		So do you think those "Guardian Robots" in the [[Great War (Animated)\|history vid]] are actually Omega Sentinels? What else could they be? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 01:16, 17 July 2010 (EDT)
			:So none of the Omega Sentinels look like the guys from the historical archive. Too bad. That would have been awesome. I still think it is unlikely the Autobots had another set of giants. Could there have been more than just the 12 Sentinels named in the Almanac II? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 19:22, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* History vid appearance? */ new section

2010-07-17T05:16:46Z

History vid appearance?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 17 July 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
	::::Oh, if there's art. I say have one article with their character name. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:44, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		::::Oh, if there's art. I say have one article with their character name. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:44, 15 July 2010 (EDT)

			== History vid appearance? ==

			So do you think those "Guardian Robots" in the [[Great War (Animated)\|history vid]] are actually Omega Sentinels? What else could they be? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 01:16, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Sentinels Have Two Names */

2010-07-15T18:44:42Z

Sentinels Have Two Names

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 15 July 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
			::::Oh, if there's art. I say have one article with their character name. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:44, 15 July 2010 (EDT)

JW at 18:36, 15 July 2010

2010-07-15T18:36:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 15 July 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Whichever name the articles wind up under, the others should probably be kept as redirects. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:11, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		:Whichever name the articles wind up under, the others should probably be kept as redirects. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:11, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
	::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
			:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Sentinels Have Two Names */

2010-07-15T18:31:01Z

Sentinels Have Two Names

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 15 July 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Obviously (with the exception of Teletran-1/Omega Supreme), when we create pages for the Sentinels, we probably won't need one page for their ship name ''and'' one page for their Supreme name. But, I couldn't decide which was better, so I left in links for both. Opinions? [[User:JW\|JW]] 23:16, 12 July 2010 (EDT)		Obviously (with the exception of Teletran-1/Omega Supreme), when we create pages for the Sentinels, we probably won't need one page for their ship name ''and'' one page for their Supreme name. But, I couldn't decide which was better, so I left in links for both. Opinions? [[User:JW\|JW]] 23:16, 12 July 2010 (EDT)
	:Whichever name the articles wind up under, the others should probably be kept as redirects. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:11, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		:Whichever name the articles wind up under, the others should probably be kept as redirects. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:11, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
			::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Sentinels Have Two Names */

2010-07-15T18:11:36Z

Sentinels Have Two Names

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 15 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Sentinels Have Two Names==		==Sentinels Have Two Names==
	Obviously (with the exception of Teletran-1/Omega Supreme), when we create pages for the Sentinels, we probably won't need one page for their ship name ''and'' one page for their Supreme name. But, I couldn't decide which was better, so I left in links for both. Opinions? [[User:JW\|JW]] 23:16, 12 July 2010 (EDT)		Obviously (with the exception of Teletran-1/Omega Supreme), when we create pages for the Sentinels, we probably won't need one page for their ship name ''and'' one page for their Supreme name. But, I couldn't decide which was better, so I left in links for both. Opinions? [[User:JW\|JW]] 23:16, 12 July 2010 (EDT)
			:Whichever name the articles wind up under, the others should probably be kept as redirects. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:11, 15 July 2010 (EDT)

JW: Sentinels Have Two Names

2010-07-13T03:16:30Z

Sentinels Have Two Names

New page

==Sentinels Have Two Names==
Obviously (with the exception of Teletran-1/Omega Supreme), when we create pages for the Sentinels, we probably won't need one page for their ship name ''and'' one page for their Supreme name. But, I couldn't decide which was better, so I left in links for both. Opinions? [[User:JW|JW]] 23:16, 12 July 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 15 July 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
	:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
			::::Oh, if there's art. I say have one article with their character name. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:44, 15 July 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 15 July 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Whichever name the articles wind up under, the others should probably be kept as redirects. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:11, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		:Whichever name the articles wind up under, the others should probably be kept as redirects. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:11, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
	::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)		::Do all those Sentinels need pages of their own? I think the information here covers them. Except Omega and Sigma of course. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 14:31, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
			:::Most of them have a little more history than is given here, and they all have both robot-mode and altmode art available, so I'm inclined to give them pages. There's definitely more to them than a ''lot'' of characters we already have pages for. [[User:JW\|JW]] 14:36, 15 July 2010 (EDT)