Talk:Onslaught (WFC) - Revision history

T9ol-Fun3e: /* Prime Decepticon category */

2025-10-29T01:07:56Z

Prime Decepticon category

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 29 October 2025
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Prime Decepticon category ==		== Prime Decepticon category ==

	Onslaught was included in the Ultimate Pop-Up Universe and characters included there “mostly” have been categorized as Prime characters. So shouldn’t Onslaught be a Prime Decepticon?		Onslaught was included in the Ultimate Pop-Up Universe and characters included there “mostly” have been categorized as Prime characters. So shouldn’t Onslaught be a Prime Decepticon? [[User:T9ol-Fun3e\|T9ol-Fun3e]] ([[User talk:T9ol-Fun3e\|talk]]) 21:07, 28 October 2025 (EDT)

T9ol-Fun3e: /* Prime Decepticon category */ new section

2025-10-29T01:07:41Z

Prime Decepticon category: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 29 October 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
	:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

			== Prime Decepticon category ==

			Onslaught was included in the Ultimate Pop-Up Universe and characters included there “mostly” have been categorized as Prime characters. So shouldn’t Onslaught be a Prime Decepticon?

ItsWalky: /* Deluxe instead of Voyager? */ not a chat room

2013-04-06T18:09:58Z

Deluxe instead of Voyager?: not a chat room

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 6 April 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
	:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

	~~== Deluxe instead of Voyager? ==~~

	~~Why does the toy have a Deluxe class size and not a Voyager the toy would be so much better if they had done that now who agrees with me?~~
	~~[[User:GalvatronTerror\|GalvatronTerror]]~~
	:TFWiki isn't a message board. Talk pages are for discussing the article, not its subject matter. As for why the toy is a deluxe, likely so that the entire team could be in the same assortment. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 11:25, 6 April 2013 (EDT)

Jalaguy: /* Deluxe instead of Voyager? */

2013-04-06T15:25:36Z

Deluxe instead of Voyager?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 6 April 2013
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why does the toy have a Deluxe class size and not a Voyager the toy would be so much better if they had done that now who agrees with me?		Why does the toy have a Deluxe class size and not a Voyager the toy would be so much better if they had done that now who agrees with me?
	[[User:GalvatronTerror\|GalvatronTerror]]		[[User:GalvatronTerror\|GalvatronTerror]]
			:TFWiki isn't a message board. Talk pages are for discussing the article, not its subject matter. As for why the toy is a deluxe, likely so that the entire team could be in the same assortment. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 11:25, 6 April 2013 (EDT)

GalvatronTerror: /* Deluxe instead of Voyager? */ new section

2013-04-06T14:46:39Z

Deluxe instead of Voyager?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 6 April 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
	:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

			== Deluxe instead of Voyager? ==

			Why does the toy have a Deluxe class size and not a Voyager the toy would be so much better if they had done that now who agrees with me?
			[[User:GalvatronTerror\|GalvatronTerror]]

The Grimlock Prime: /* G2 deco repurpose? */

2012-09-21T00:16:19Z

G2 deco repurpose?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 21 September 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
	:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
			:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

Detour: /* G2 deco repurpose? */

2012-09-21T00:10:41Z

G2 deco repurpose?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 21 September 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
			:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

The Grimlock Prime: /* G2 deco repurpose? */

2012-09-20T23:49:24Z

G2 deco repurpose?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 20 September 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
			:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

Derik: /* G2 deco repurpose? */

2012-07-23T18:16:15Z

G2 deco repurpose?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 23 July 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
			::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* G2 deco repurpose? */

2012-07-23T17:12:29Z

G2 deco repurpose?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 23 July 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Although I understand that the G2 deco is the G1 character, because of the box info, if the G2 deco ends up as DLC for the FOC game, then wouldn't that mean they repurposed the G2 toy into the WFC character? [[Special:Contributions/71.238.50.144\|71.238.50.144]] 07:37, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		Although I understand that the G2 deco is the G1 character, because of the box info, if the G2 deco ends up as DLC for the FOC game, then wouldn't that mean they repurposed the G2 toy into the WFC character? [[Special:Contributions/71.238.50.144\|71.238.50.144]] 07:37, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
			:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 21 September 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
	:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
			:::::Oh. Sorry about that. I had just checked on G1 Bruticus's page and not on the G1 Onslaught page.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 20:16, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 21 September 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)		:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
			:::: Was it not clear enough the first time you asked, that the Amazon/BBTS deco is a representation of G1 Bruticus? The picutres are already on [[Onslaught (G1)\|Generation 1 Onslaught]]'s page! This discussion was settled months ago. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 20:10, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 20 September 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
			:::I have pictures of Onslaught and the rest of the Combaticons toys if you want to add them to Onslaught's and the Combaticons' toy sections.[[User:The Grimlock Prime\|The Grimlock Prime]] 19:49, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 23 July 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
			::Concur. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:16, 23 July 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 23 July 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Although I understand that the G2 deco is the G1 character, because of the box info, if the G2 deco ends up as DLC for the FOC game, then wouldn't that mean they repurposed the G2 toy into the WFC character? [[Special:Contributions/71.238.50.144\|71.238.50.144]] 07:37, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		Although I understand that the G2 deco is the G1 character, because of the box info, if the G2 deco ends up as DLC for the FOC game, then wouldn't that mean they repurposed the G2 toy into the WFC character? [[Special:Contributions/71.238.50.144\|71.238.50.144]] 07:37, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
	:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)		:Given one of the skins is blatantly G1 Prime, I would imagine not. Unless you want to say that G1 Prime was repurposed into Aligned Prime, and no one wants that. Also, the G2 skin for Bruticus doesn't have G2 symbols, for whatever that's worth. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 11:23, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
			:DLC often includes things from different continuity families, like the various G1 bodies available for the movie games. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:12, 23 July 2012 (EDT)