Talk:Optimus Prime's rescuees - Revision history

Abates: Talk:Optimus Prime's rescuee moved to Talk:Optimus Prime's rescuees: I'm just gonna go ahead and do this

2010-02-11T21:23:36Z

Talk:Optimus Prime's rescuee moved to Talk:Optimus Prime's rescuees: I'm just gonna go ahead and do this

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:23, 11 February 2010
(No difference)

Tigerpaw28: /* Single or plural */

2010-01-28T06:20:47Z

Single or plural

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:20, 28 January 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)		:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)
	::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)		::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)
			:::::Zamojin Empress can stay as it's referring to the title of Zamojin Empress and not the individuals who held it. Maccadam's bartender on the other hand, should probably be moved. --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 01:20, 28 January 2010 (EST)

Geewunling at 05:44, 28 January 2010

2010-01-28T05:44:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 28 January 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)		::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)
	:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)		:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)
			::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)

Khajidha at 21:14, 27 January 2010

2010-01-27T21:14:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 27 January 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as [[Zamojin Empress]] and [[Maccadam's bartender]]. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)		:I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as [[Zamojin Empress]] and [[Maccadam's bartender]]. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)
	::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)		::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)
			:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)

Interrobang: /* Single or plural */

2010-01-27T06:44:52Z

Single or plural

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:44, 27 January 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I know article titles are usually singular (Aerialbot vs Aerialbots), but this article just doesn't feel right at the singular title. Maybe because it's actually about 2 individuals and not an actual group? Anyone else agree? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 26 January 2010 (EST)		I know article titles are usually singular (Aerialbot vs Aerialbots), but this article just doesn't feel right at the singular title. Maybe because it's actually about 2 individuals and not an actual group? Anyone else agree? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 26 January 2010 (EST)
	:I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as [[Zamojin Empress]] and [[Maccadam's bartender]]. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)		:I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as [[Zamojin Empress]] and [[Maccadam's bartender]]. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)
			::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)

Geewunling at 06:25, 27 January 2010

2010-01-27T06:25:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 27 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Single or plural ==		== Single or plural ==

	I know article titles are usually singular (Aerialbot vs Aerialbots), but this article just doesn't feel right at the singular title. Maybe because it's actually about 2 individuals and not an actual group? Anyone else agree? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 26 January 2010 (EST)		I know article titles are usually singular (Aerialbot vs Aerialbots), but this article just doesn't feel right at the singular title. Maybe because it's actually about 2 individuals and not an actual group? Anyone else agree? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 26 January 2010 (EST)
			:I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as [[Zamojin Empress]] and [[Maccadam's bartender]]. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)

Khajidha: Single or plural

2010-01-26T21:49:28Z

Single or plural

New page

== Single or plural ==

I know article titles are usually singular (Aerialbot vs Aerialbots), but this article just doesn't feel right at the singular title. Maybe because it's actually about 2 individuals and not an actual group? Anyone else agree? [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 16:49, 26 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:20, 28 January 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)		:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)
	::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)		::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)
			:::::Zamojin Empress can stay as it's referring to the title of Zamojin Empress and not the individuals who held it. Maccadam's bartender on the other hand, should probably be moved. --[[User:Tigerpaw28\|Tigerpaw28]] 01:20, 28 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 28 January 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)		::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)
	:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)		:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)
			::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 27 January 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as [[Zamojin Empress]] and [[Maccadam's bartender]]. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)		:I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as [[Zamojin Empress]] and [[Maccadam's bartender]]. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)
	::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)		::"Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)
			:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)