Talk:Optimus Supreme - Revision history

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 - */

2009-03-24T12:22:54Z

Deceptitran fixes v1.0 - wikia_unspam#1 -

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 24 March 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:"Lump of...." ...something. Ends in "...bium"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 13:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)		:"Lump of...." ...something. Ends in "...bium"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 13:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
	::Corobium? (This is not a word.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 13:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		::Corobium? (This is not a word.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 13:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Derik: /* Bulkhead's line */

2008-06-11T13:32:47Z

Bulkhead's line

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 11 June 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:
	...what is Bulkhead saying? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 13:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)		...what is Bulkhead saying? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 13:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

	:"Lump of...." ...something. Ends in "...bium"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 13:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:"Lump of...." ...something. Ends in "...bium"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 13:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
			::Corobium? (This is not a word.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 13:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Chris McFeely: /* Bulkhead's line */

2008-06-11T13:28:37Z

Bulkhead's line

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 11 June 2008
Line 28:		Line 28:
	"Okay ladies, it's now or never! Let's shut down that [CONQUERING TIME ITSELF], transform!"		"Okay ladies, it's now or never! Let's shut down that [CONQUERING TIME ITSELF], transform!"

	...what is Bulkhead saying? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 13:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		...what is Bulkhead saying? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 13:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

			:"Lump of...." ...something. Ends in "...bium"? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 13:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Derik: /* Bulkhead's line */ new section

2008-06-11T13:18:18Z

Bulkhead's line: new section

New page

Why isn't this just under Prime's page? It's not like his personality changed, if Optimus Supreme gets a page then so should Wing Convoy and Liger Convoy(excuse me, I can't remember whatever silly names Habsro gave those forms), and that would just be silly [[User:85.195.123.29|85.195.123.29]]

: I don't know. I merely cleaned it up to our basic formatting standards, I don't have the authority to ask somebody to delete it without prior discussion. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 23:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

"Liger Convoy" isn't silly?<br>
Any rate, I'm iffy about it myself. Yeah, it's named, but I'm not really seeing how it's different enough from any other Powerlinx two-bot combo in the series we don't article-ize, being basically "Optimus wearing Omega Supreme as a coat". --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 00:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

The reason I added this page was because an Energon article misnamed it "omega prime" and linked to the RID character page instead of this one. Silly as the names are, the combination was called Optimus Supreme. {{unsigned|64.250.215.15}}

:Well, it's good to have the name right, so it's good that you corrected the other article. But I agree that this page doesn't really need to exist. We can just put the info about Optimus Supreme on Optimus' page. So, whoever made the link in the first place and misnamed him was a little overzealous, I guess. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 22:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Do not delete, please. {{unsigned|Mudflap Prime}}

:Why? Also, please sign your talk posts. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 03:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I got here from the Energon episode list, because there's an Energon episode named Optimus Supreme. But.. uh, this isn't about it, and apparently we wanted to delete this article two months ago anyway? Thought I'd call attention to it again. --[[User:Monzo|Monzo]] 07:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
:I put up the delete tag. I don't see a point to it, either. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 09:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I've always thought it was somewhat redundant to give combined modes their own pages - the first pair that comes to mind is [[Constructicon (G1)|Constructicon]] and [[Devastator (G1)]]. Would the devastator page be somewhat redundant, as every single appearance he's in also, to the best of my understand, features all the Constructicons? What am I missing? --[[User:Zodberg|Zodberg]] 12:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
::Also, the combined robot does NOT always show up when the subgroup that composes him does. Devastator is absent from War Within 1, Megatron Origins (well, #2 at least, I have no inclination to read #3)... --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 15:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
:::I've read three, and Devastator isn't in it either. So far, the only combiner we've seen in the main IDW continuity is Monstructor. --[[User:FortMax|FortMax]] 15:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
:::ummm I never said that all Constructicon appearances were devastator appearances, just that all devastator appearances were Constructicon appearances.--[[User:Zodberg|Zodberg]] 10:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

== Bulkhead's line ==

"Okay ladies, it's now or never! Let's shut down that [CONQUERING TIME ITSELF], transform!"

...what is Bulkhead saying? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 13:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Zodberg at 10:33, 9 October 2007

2007-10-09T10:33:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 9 October 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
	::Also, the combined robot does NOT always show up when the subgroup that composes him does. Devastator is absent from War Within 1, Megatron Origins (well, #2 at least, I have no inclination to read #3)... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		::Also, the combined robot does NOT always show up when the subgroup that composes him does. Devastator is absent from War Within 1, Megatron Origins (well, #2 at least, I have no inclination to read #3)... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
	:::I've read three, and Devastator isn't in it either. So far, the only combiner we've seen in the main IDW continuity is Monstructor. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 15:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:::I've read three, and Devastator isn't in it either. So far, the only combiner we've seen in the main IDW continuity is Monstructor. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 15:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
			:::ummm I never said that all Constructicon appearances were devastator appearances, just that all devastator appearances were Constructicon appearances.--[[User:Zodberg\|Zodberg]] 10:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

FortMax at 15:47, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T15:47:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 8 October 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
	::Also, the combined robot does NOT always show up when the subgroup that composes him does. Devastator is absent from War Within 1, Megatron Origins (well, #2 at least, I have no inclination to read #3)... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		::Also, the combined robot does NOT always show up when the subgroup that composes him does. Devastator is absent from War Within 1, Megatron Origins (well, #2 at least, I have no inclination to read #3)... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
			:::I've read three, and Devastator isn't in it either. So far, the only combiner we've seen in the main IDW continuity is Monstructor. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 15:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

M Sipher at 15:43, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T15:43:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 8 October 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I've always thought it was somewhat redundant to give combined modes their own pages - the first pair that comes to mind is [[Constructicon]] and [[Devastator (G1)]]. Would the devastator page be somewhat redundant, as every single appearance he's in also, to the best of my understand, features all the Constructicons? What am I missing? --[[User:Zodberg\|Zodberg]] 12:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)		I've always thought it was somewhat redundant to give combined modes their own pages - the first pair that comes to mind is [[Constructicon]] and [[Devastator (G1)]]. Would the devastator page be somewhat redundant, as every single appearance he's in also, to the best of my understand, features all the Constructicons? What am I missing? --[[User:Zodberg\|Zodberg]] 12:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

	:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
			::Also, the combined robot does NOT always show up when the subgroup that composes him does. Devastator is absent from War Within 1, Megatron Origins (well, #2 at least, I have no inclination to read #3)... --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Steve-o at 14:31, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T14:31:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 8 October 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:I put up the delete tag. I don't see a point to it, either. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 09:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)		:I put up the delete tag. I don't see a point to it, either. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 09:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

	I've always thought it was somewhat redundant to give combined modes their own pages - the first pair that comes to mind is [[Constructicon]] and [[Devastator (G1)]]. Would the devastator page be somewhat redundant, as every single appearance he's in also, to the best of my understand, features all the Constructicons? What am I missing? --[[User:Zodberg\|Zodberg]] 12:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		I've always thought it was somewhat redundant to give combined modes their own pages - the first pair that comes to mind is [[Constructicon]] and [[Devastator (G1)]]. Would the devastator page be somewhat redundant, as every single appearance he's in also, to the best of my understand, features all the Constructicons? What am I missing? --[[User:Zodberg\|Zodberg]] 12:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

			:Devastator is a character, while "Constructicon" is a subgroup or a group of characters. They are semantically different entities. Combining those two articles would, at the very least, require us to come up with a new hybridized article format which can accomodate covering two completely different sorts of entity in a single article. There is more to an article than a fiction section. That said, when a combined form is ''not'' a new character, I think that combined form doesn't need its own article. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 14:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Zodberg at 12:29, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T12:29:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 8 October 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I got here from the Energon episode list, because there's an Energon episode named Optimus Supreme. But.. uh, this isn't about it, and apparently we wanted to delete this article two months ago anyway? Thought I'd call attention to it again. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 07:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)		I got here from the Energon episode list, because there's an Energon episode named Optimus Supreme. But.. uh, this isn't about it, and apparently we wanted to delete this article two months ago anyway? Thought I'd call attention to it again. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 07:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
	:I put up the delete tag. I don't see a point to it, either. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 09:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:I put up the delete tag. I don't see a point to it, either. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 09:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

			I've always thought it was somewhat redundant to give combined modes their own pages - the first pair that comes to mind is [[Constructicon]] and [[Devastator (G1)]]. Would the devastator page be somewhat redundant, as every single appearance he's in also, to the best of my understand, features all the Constructicons? What am I missing? --[[User:Zodberg\|Zodberg]] 12:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

FFN at 09:28, 6 October 2007

2007-10-06T09:28:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 6 October 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:Why? Also, please sign your talk posts. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 03:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)		:Why? Also, please sign your talk posts. --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 03:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

	I got here from the Energon episode list, because there's an Energon episode named Optimus Supreme. But.. uh, this isn't about it, and apparently we wanted to delete this article two months ago anyway? Thought I'd call attention to it again. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 07:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		I got here from the Energon episode list, because there's an Energon episode named Optimus Supreme. But.. uh, this isn't about it, and apparently we wanted to delete this article two months ago anyway? Thought I'd call attention to it again. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 07:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
			:I put up the delete tag. I don't see a point to it, either. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 09:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>