Talk:Outpost D-109 - Revision history

Jackpot: Talk:New moved to Talk:Outpost D-109: See Talk page.

2011-04-19T14:52:10Z

Talk:New moved to Talk:Outpost D-109: See Talk page.

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:52, 19 April 2011
(No difference)

Jackpot: /* Planet New? */

2011-02-24T08:08:41Z

Planet New?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 24 February 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::::::As far as I can tell, even the people who have been positive about "Planet New" acknowledge that it was most likely a typo. So I say we move the article to "Outpost D-109" and put the "New" business in a Note. Any objections? - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 03:08, 24 February 2011 (EST)

	:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::::At no point did I say it was silly. You guys do with this page as you wish. It's not worth trying to argue over the subject AND the content of my own responses. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:14, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::At no point did I say it was silly. You guys do with this page as you wish. It's not worth trying to argue over the subject AND the content of my own responses. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:14, 20 February 2011 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Planet New? */

2011-02-20T20:14:40Z

Planet New?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 20 February 2011
Line 23:		Line 23:
	::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::::::At no point did I say it was silly. You guys do with this page as you wish. It's not worth trying to argue over the subject AND the content of my own responses. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:14, 20 February 2011 (EST)

Detour at 19:44, 20 February 2011

2011-02-20T19:44:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 20 February 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Planet New? */

2011-02-20T19:40:49Z

Planet New?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 20 February 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)

Hooper X at 19:26, 20 February 2011

2011-02-20T19:26:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 20 February 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::::::::::::Simon Furman is the guy who said that "[[Life Spark]]" is the name of a specific dude and not a common noun. That's pretty much the exact situation we're in right now. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:38, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::Simon Furman is the guy who said that "[[Life Spark]]" is the name of a specific dude and not a common noun. That's pretty much the exact situation we're in right now. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:38, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)

Hooper X: /* Planet New? */

2011-02-20T19:23:28Z

Planet New?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 20 February 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::::::::::: ps ok bro [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::: ps ok bro [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::Simon Furman is the guy who said that "[[Life Spark]]" is the name of a specific dude and not a common noun. That's pretty much the exact situation we're in right now. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:38, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::Simon Furman is the guy who said that "[[Life Spark]]" is the name of a specific dude and not a common noun. That's pretty much the exact situation we're in right now. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:38, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Planet New? */

2011-02-20T14:38:13Z

Planet New?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 20 February 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::::::::::Even better idea. Simon Furman has a blog. Let's just go over there and ask him, and when he laughs in your face and says "are you kidding me?", we can consider it resolved. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::Even better idea. Simon Furman has a blog. Let's just go over there and ask him, and when he laughs in your face and says "are you kidding me?", we can consider it resolved. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::: ps ok bro [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::: ps ok bro [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::::Simon Furman is the guy who said that "[[Life Spark]]" is the name of a specific dude and not a common noun. That's pretty much the exact situation we're in right now. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:38, 20 February 2011 (EST)

Hooper X at 14:22, 20 February 2011

2011-02-20T14:22:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 20 February 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::::::::P.S., Hooper X, I take offense at that last sentence of yours. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:36, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::P.S., Hooper X, I take offense at that last sentence of yours. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:36, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::Even better idea. Simon Furman has a blog. Let's just go over there and ask him, and when he laughs in your face and says "are you kidding me?", we can consider it resolved. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::Even better idea. Simon Furman has a blog. Let's just go over there and ask him, and when he laughs in your face and says "are you kidding me?", we can consider it resolved. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::: ps ok bro [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)

Hooper X at 14:17, 20 February 2011

2011-02-20T14:17:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 20 February 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::::::::::Since opinions are a bit divided, how about we just take what we got at face value and add a note? [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:36, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::Since opinions are a bit divided, how about we just take what we got at face value and add a note? [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:36, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::P.S., Hooper X, I take offense at that last sentence of yours. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:36, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::P.S., Hooper X, I take offense at that last sentence of yours. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 02:36, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::Even better idea. Simon Furman has a blog. Let's just go over there and ask him, and when he laughs in your face and says "are you kidding me?", we can consider it resolved. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:17, 20 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 24 February 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::::::As far as I can tell, even the people who have been positive about "Planet New" acknowledge that it was most likely a typo. So I say we move the article to "Outpost D-109" and put the "New" business in a Note. Any objections? - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 03:08, 24 February 2011 (EST)

	:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::::At no point did I say it was silly. You guys do with this page as you wish. It's not worth trying to argue over the subject AND the content of my own responses. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:14, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::At no point did I say it was silly. You guys do with this page as you wish. It's not worth trying to argue over the subject AND the content of my own responses. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:14, 20 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 20 February 2011
Line 23:		Line 23:
	::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::::::At no point did I say it was silly. You guys do with this page as you wish. It's not worth trying to argue over the subject AND the content of my own responses. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:14, 20 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 20 February 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::::I don't understand why asking Furman on this is such a silly idea to you, Walky. And yeah, like Hx said... this isn't exactly the same situation as the Life Spark thing, since the Life Spark thing involved Furman misreading someone else's writing, and "New" here is about some of us misreading Furman's writing. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 14:44, 20 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 20 February 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			::::::::::::::::That's what gets me about this, I could see having the article at New if there were no other available designation but there is one. Arguing in favor of what is obviously a typo over D-109 just strikes me as being willfully obtuse. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:40, 20 February 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 20 February 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::::::::::::Simon Furman is the guy who said that "[[Life Spark]]" is the name of a specific dude and not a common noun. That's pretty much the exact situation we're in right now. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:38, 20 February 2011 (EST)		::::::::::::::Simon Furman is the guy who said that "[[Life Spark]]" is the name of a specific dude and not a common noun. That's pretty much the exact situation we're in right now. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:38, 20 February 2011 (EST)
	:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)		:::::::::::::::It's only the same situation insofar as Furman misread what someone else wrote and assumed it was a proper noun, and a wiki user misread what Simon Furman wrote and assumed it was a proper noun. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:23, 20 February 2011 (EST)
			:::::::::::::::Also, we could just say "the hell with it" and move it to [[Outpost D-109]]. But that would be too easy. [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 14:26, 20 February 2011 (EST)