Talk:Pokeformers - Revision history

M Sipher at 02:04, 19 April 2025

2025-04-19T02:04:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 19 April 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::You mean the one that actually gives the impression that "Armada is a rip-off of Pokemon" is ''fact'' and that's the wiki's stance on the matter? I don't think it's possible for me to agree ''less'' with that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 22:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)		:::::You mean the one that actually gives the impression that "Armada is a rip-off of Pokemon" is ''fact'' and that's the wiki's stance on the matter? I don't think it's possible for me to agree ''less'' with that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 22:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::Okay, see, now I took the use of italicization and the "Yeah" in there as an indication of sarcasm. Less in-your-face about it than the current version, but still sarcastic. If it doesn't read that way to everyone, and rather comes across as ''sincerely'' stating that Armada is just a rip-off of Pokemon, then no, I would not recommend returning to it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Okay, see, now I took the use of italicization and the "Yeah" in there as an indication of sarcasm. Less in-your-face about it than the current version, but still sarcastic. If it doesn't read that way to everyone, and rather comes across as ''sincerely'' stating that Armada is just a rip-off of Pokemon, then no, I would not recommend returning to it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
	:::Wait, is there some reason we ''shouldn't'' ridicule anybody who's ever used this term? What makes this any different than [[neon]], [[trukk not munky]], or [[ruined ~~forever~~]]? --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 04:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		:::Wait, is there some reason we ''shouldn't'' ridicule anybody who's ever used this term? What makes this any different than [[neon]], [[trukk not munky]], or [[ruined FOREVER]]? --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 04:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
	::::Well, the "neon" and "trukk not munky" articles are less snarky, more straightforward explanations of the terms, and I'm on record on the "ruined forever"'s talk page as seeing no point to its existence. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		::::Well, the "neon" and "trukk not munky" articles are less snarky, more straightforward explanations of the terms, and I'm on record on the "ruined forever"'s talk page as seeing no point to its existence. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
	::::Or perhaps the fact that, as the article itself says, there actually ''is'' a certain degree of merit to the comparison between the two series, and the article as writ smacks of trying to decry any parallels in a snarky opening before grudgingly acknowledging that there ''are'' a lot of similarities, but, um, they totally used a few of them maybe one time before twenty years ago and not again until now, and, um,, it only lasted for ''half'' the series, and so, like, so it's not that serious, really, um, it doesn't count, and um? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		::::Or perhaps the fact that, as the article itself says, there actually ''is'' a certain degree of merit to the comparison between the two series, and the article as writ smacks of trying to decry any parallels in a snarky opening before grudgingly acknowledging that there ''are'' a lot of similarities, but, um, they totally used a few of them maybe one time before twenty years ago and not again until now, and, um,, it only lasted for ''half'' the series, and so, like, so it's not that serious, really, um, it doesn't count, and um? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Delibirda: /* Misinformation */

2019-12-05T07:48:41Z

Misinformation

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 5 December 2019
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)		:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)
	::Yeah, the chances of this article being mistaken as a definitive resource for Pokémon information are pretty slim, I don't think it's that big a deal. It's not even specifically about Pokémon anyway, it's about people comparing Transformers Armada ''to'' Pokémon. Plus there's a Bulbapedia link at the bottom of the page if anyone needs it. -[[User:Foffy the Sheep\|Foffy]] ([[User talk:Foffy the Sheep\|talk]]) 02:00, 19 November 2019 (EST)		::Yeah, the chances of this article being mistaken as a definitive resource for Pokémon information are pretty slim, I don't think it's that big a deal. It's not even specifically about Pokémon anyway, it's about people comparing Transformers Armada ''to'' Pokémon. Plus there's a Bulbapedia link at the bottom of the page if anyone needs it. -[[User:Foffy the Sheep\|Foffy]] ([[User talk:Foffy the Sheep\|talk]]) 02:00, 19 November 2019 (EST)
	:::O.K		:::O.K--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 02:48, 5 December 2019 (EST)

Delibirda: /* Misinformation */

2019-12-05T07:48:27Z

Misinformation

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 5 December 2019
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)		:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)
	::Yeah, the chances of this article being mistaken as a definitive resource for Pokémon information are pretty slim, I don't think it's that big a deal. It's not even specifically about Pokémon anyway, it's about people comparing Transformers Armada ''to'' Pokémon. Plus there's a Bulbapedia link at the bottom of the page if anyone needs it. -[[User:Foffy the Sheep\|Foffy]] ([[User talk:Foffy the Sheep\|talk]]) 02:00, 19 November 2019 (EST)		::Yeah, the chances of this article being mistaken as a definitive resource for Pokémon information are pretty slim, I don't think it's that big a deal. It's not even specifically about Pokémon anyway, it's about people comparing Transformers Armada ''to'' Pokémon. Plus there's a Bulbapedia link at the bottom of the page if anyone needs it. -[[User:Foffy the Sheep\|Foffy]] ([[User talk:Foffy the Sheep\|talk]]) 02:00, 19 November 2019 (EST)
			:::O.K

Foffy the Sheep: /* Misinformation */

2019-11-19T07:00:53Z

Misinformation

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 19 November 2019
Line 26:		Line 26:
	This article contains too much misinformation about Pokémon. For example, it suggest that Pokémon is just an anime. We need to fix that, pronto.--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 06:54, 18 November 2019 (EST)		This article contains too much misinformation about Pokémon. For example, it suggest that Pokémon is just an anime. We need to fix that, pronto.--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 06:54, 18 November 2019 (EST)
	:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)		:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)
			::Yeah, the chances of this article being mistaken as a definitive resource for Pokémon information are pretty slim, I don't think it's that big a deal. It's not even specifically about Pokémon anyway, it's about people comparing Transformers Armada ''to'' Pokémon. Plus there's a Bulbapedia link at the bottom of the page if anyone needs it. -[[User:Foffy the Sheep\|Foffy]] ([[User talk:Foffy the Sheep\|talk]]) 02:00, 19 November 2019 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Misinformation */

2019-11-18T15:32:44Z

Misinformation

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 18 November 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	This article contains too much misinformation about Pokémon. For example, it suggest that Pokémon is just an anime. We need to fix that, pronto.--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 06:54, 18 November 2019 (EST)		This article contains too much misinformation about Pokémon. For example, it suggest that Pokémon is just an anime. We need to fix that, pronto.--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 06:54, 18 November 2019 (EST)
			:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)

Delibirda: /* Misinformation */ new section

2019-11-18T11:54:44Z

Misinformation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 18 November 2019
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==Deliberate?==		==Deliberate?==
	Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)		Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

			== Misinformation ==

			This article contains too much misinformation about Pokémon. For example, it suggest that Pokémon is just an anime. We need to fix that, pronto.--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 06:54, 18 November 2019 (EST)

Jalaguy: Not a message board.

2013-04-20T16:55:19Z

Not a message board.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 20 April 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==Deliberate?==		==Deliberate?==
	Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)		Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

	~~== Characters that look like Pokemon ==~~

	~~I realized that Skarmoray looks like Transformers Prime Starscream. I mean, they have the same coloration, flight ability & they're cool looking.~~

Femtransfan: /* Characters that look like Pokemon */ new section

2013-04-20T16:31:57Z

Characters that look like Pokemon: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 20 April 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==Deliberate?==		==Deliberate?==
	Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)		Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

			== Characters that look like Pokemon ==

			I realized that Skarmoray looks like Transformers Prime Starscream. I mean, they have the same coloration, flight ability & they're cool looking.

Starfield: Undo revision 417677 by 95.132.251.105 (Talk)

2010-01-19T14:49:06Z

Undo revision 417677 by 95.132.251.105 (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 19 January 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==Deliberate?==		==Deliberate?==
	Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)		Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

	~~== Eg sampykki ==~~

	~~Takk fyrir ahugaverdar upplysingar~~

95.132.251.105: /* Eg sampykki */ new section

2010-01-19T14:39:44Z

Eg sampykki: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 19 January 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==Deliberate?==		==Deliberate?==
	Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)		Did we ever find a record of the comments noted by [[User:Vanguard]] above, wherein Hasbro execs stated that they were deliberately targeting the Pokemon crowd? That's definitely worth noting in the article, if it's correct. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

			== Eg sampykki ==

			Takk fyrir ahugaverdar upplysingar

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 19 April 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::You mean the one that actually gives the impression that "Armada is a rip-off of Pokemon" is ''fact'' and that's the wiki's stance on the matter? I don't think it's possible for me to agree ''less'' with that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 22:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)		:::::You mean the one that actually gives the impression that "Armada is a rip-off of Pokemon" is ''fact'' and that's the wiki's stance on the matter? I don't think it's possible for me to agree ''less'' with that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 22:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::Okay, see, now I took the use of italicization and the "Yeah" in there as an indication of sarcasm. Less in-your-face about it than the current version, but still sarcastic. If it doesn't read that way to everyone, and rather comes across as ''sincerely'' stating that Armada is just a rip-off of Pokemon, then no, I would not recommend returning to it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Okay, see, now I took the use of italicization and the "Yeah" in there as an indication of sarcasm. Less in-your-face about it than the current version, but still sarcastic. If it doesn't read that way to everyone, and rather comes across as ''sincerely'' stating that Armada is just a rip-off of Pokemon, then no, I would not recommend returning to it. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
	:::Wait, is there some reason we ''shouldn't'' ridicule anybody who's ever used this term? What makes this any different than [[neon]], [[trukk not munky]], or [[ruined ~~forever~~]]? --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 04:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		:::Wait, is there some reason we ''shouldn't'' ridicule anybody who's ever used this term? What makes this any different than [[neon]], [[trukk not munky]], or [[ruined FOREVER]]? --[[User:Steve-o\|Steve-o]] 04:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
	::::Well, the "neon" and "trukk not munky" articles are less snarky, more straightforward explanations of the terms, and I'm on record on the "ruined forever"'s talk page as seeing no point to its existence. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		::::Well, the "neon" and "trukk not munky" articles are less snarky, more straightforward explanations of the terms, and I'm on record on the "ruined forever"'s talk page as seeing no point to its existence. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
	::::Or perhaps the fact that, as the article itself says, there actually ''is'' a certain degree of merit to the comparison between the two series, and the article as writ smacks of trying to decry any parallels in a snarky opening before grudgingly acknowledging that there ''are'' a lot of similarities, but, um, they totally used a few of them maybe one time before twenty years ago and not again until now, and, um,, it only lasted for ''half'' the series, and so, like, so it's not that serious, really, um, it doesn't count, and um? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		::::Or perhaps the fact that, as the article itself says, there actually ''is'' a certain degree of merit to the comparison between the two series, and the article as writ smacks of trying to decry any parallels in a snarky opening before grudgingly acknowledging that there ''are'' a lot of similarities, but, um, they totally used a few of them maybe one time before twenty years ago and not again until now, and, um,, it only lasted for ''half'' the series, and so, like, so it's not that serious, really, um, it doesn't count, and um? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 19 November 2019
Line 26:		Line 26:
	This article contains too much misinformation about Pokémon. For example, it suggest that Pokémon is just an anime. We need to fix that, pronto.--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 06:54, 18 November 2019 (EST)		This article contains too much misinformation about Pokémon. For example, it suggest that Pokémon is just an anime. We need to fix that, pronto.--[[User:Delibirda\|Delibirda]] ([[User talk:Delibirda\|talk]]) 06:54, 18 November 2019 (EST)
	:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)		:We are not a Pokemon resource. The level of detail of this article is fine. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:32, 18 November 2019 (EST)
			::Yeah, the chances of this article being mistaken as a definitive resource for Pokémon information are pretty slim, I don't think it's that big a deal. It's not even specifically about Pokémon anyway, it's about people comparing Transformers Armada ''to'' Pokémon. Plus there's a Bulbapedia link at the bottom of the page if anyone needs it. -[[User:Foffy the Sheep\|Foffy]] ([[User talk:Foffy the Sheep\|talk]]) 02:00, 19 November 2019 (EST)