Talk:Predacon (BW) - Revision history

Sabrblade: /* Merge with Predacon (RID) */

2021-07-07T23:10:08Z

Merge with Predacon (RID)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 7 July 2021
Line 57:		Line 57:
	::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::I'm definitely in favor of folding RID Preds into BW Preds, and having the Destrongers get their own page in the same vein as the Dimension Patrol. [[User:TransFormersfan1\|TransFormersfan1]] ([[User talk:TransFormersfan1\|talk]]) 18:34, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		:::I'm definitely in favor of folding RID Preds into BW Preds, and having the Destrongers get their own page in the same vein as the Dimension Patrol. [[User:TransFormersfan1\|TransFormersfan1]] ([[User talk:TransFormersfan1\|talk]]) 18:34, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
			::::The thing about the Destrongers is that the show never really addressed the name difference, never explained if it referred to the whole faction (like if the Destron faction just changed its name to the Destronger faction but still kept the same insignia and such) or if it only referred to Gigatron's specific team. Either way, the Destrongers were functionally identical to the Destrons/Predacons of the Beast Era, so I'd say it's ambiguous enough to just cover the Destrongers on the Predacon page proper. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 19:10, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

TransFormersfan1: /* Merge with Predacon (RID) */

2021-07-07T22:34:37Z

Merge with Predacon (RID)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 7 July 2021
Line 56:		Line 56:
	: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
			:::I'm definitely in favor of folding RID Preds into BW Preds, and having the Destrongers get their own page in the same vein as the Dimension Patrol. [[User:TransFormersfan1\|TransFormersfan1]] ([[User talk:TransFormersfan1\|talk]]) 18:34, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

Sabrblade: /* Merge with Predacon (RID) */

2021-07-07T19:11:57Z

Merge with Predacon (RID)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 7 July 2021
Line 55:		Line 55:
	I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

Sabrblade: /* Merge with Predacon (RID) */

2021-07-07T19:11:45Z

Merge with Predacon (RID)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 7 July 2021
Line 55:		Line 55:
	I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
			::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

Locoman: /* Merge with Predacon (RID) */

2021-07-07T18:59:18Z

Merge with Predacon (RID)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 7 July 2021
Line 54:		Line 54:
	==Merge with Predacon (RID)==		==Merge with Predacon (RID)==
	I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
			: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

Broadside at 18:58, 7 July 2021

2021-07-07T18:58:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 7 July 2021
Line 51:		Line 51:

	So, ah, maybe at some point someone could give this page a sprucing up like what was done for the Maximals? Because it needs a lotta love and attention. [[User:Smasher\|Smasher]] ([[User talk:Smasher\|talk]]) 12:39, 22 December 2018 (EST)		So, ah, maybe at some point someone could give this page a sprucing up like what was done for the Maximals? Because it needs a lotta love and attention. [[User:Smasher\|Smasher]] ([[User talk:Smasher\|talk]]) 12:39, 22 December 2018 (EST)

			==Merge with Predacon (RID)==
			I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

Smasher at 17:39, 22 December 2018

2018-12-22T17:39:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 22 December 2018
Line 47:		Line 47:

	It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

			==Clean-up==

			So, ah, maybe at some point someone could give this page a sprucing up like what was done for the Maximals? Because it needs a lotta love and attention. [[User:Smasher\|Smasher]] ([[User talk:Smasher\|talk]]) 12:39, 22 December 2018 (EST)

Destrongerlupus: /* Confusion? */

2010-11-18T22:27:09Z

Confusion?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 18 November 2010
Line 43:		Line 43:
	:The Japanese timeline placing BWNeo and BWII as thousands of years later seems to be trying to fix the problems with them co-existing witht he US BW stuff... while ignoring all the little references (on both sides) that essentially '''demand''' they take place in the same time period, and creating much huger problems by putting them in the future.		:The Japanese timeline placing BWNeo and BWII as thousands of years later seems to be trying to fix the problems with them co-existing witht he US BW stuff... while ignoring all the little references (on both sides) that essentially '''demand''' they take place in the same time period, and creating much huger problems by putting them in the future.
	:I '''really''' want to ignore this stupidity. Or at least give it no more attention than we do the Beast Wars 0.0 story. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:12, 24 October 2009 (EDT)		:I '''really''' want to ignore this stupidity. Or at least give it no more attention than we do the Beast Wars 0.0 story. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:12, 24 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::US BW is EXPLICITLY a Time-Travel story. BW II explicitly takes place on future Earth (Gaea), and US BW explicitly takes place on Past-Earth with the main characters having travelled back in time from future-Cybertron. That's some very elegant, and I'm sure intentional, symmetry, and has to be given some credence. Whether TM2 Cybershark is off in space (at whatever time) fighting BWII Space-Pirate Seacons or not, the main-casts are definitely not in the same time period. At least not without the IDW Profile retconning, which I admidtedly don't know anything about. But I would think the original source material would take precedence. But in any event, soke continuity seperation (IDW material and toy-packaging references Cybershark, Magmatron, etc. vs. original Japanese animation) is probably neccessary. User:Destrongerlupus\|Destrongerlupus]] 17:19, 18 November 2010 (EST)

	==Quintessons==		==Quintessons==

	It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

Destrongerlupus: /* Confusion? */

2010-11-18T22:25:54Z

Confusion?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 18 November 2010
Line 43:		Line 43:
	:The Japanese timeline placing BWNeo and BWII as thousands of years later seems to be trying to fix the problems with them co-existing witht he US BW stuff... while ignoring all the little references (on both sides) that essentially '''demand''' they take place in the same time period, and creating much huger problems by putting them in the future.		:The Japanese timeline placing BWNeo and BWII as thousands of years later seems to be trying to fix the problems with them co-existing witht he US BW stuff... while ignoring all the little references (on both sides) that essentially '''demand''' they take place in the same time period, and creating much huger problems by putting them in the future.
	:I '''really''' want to ignore this stupidity. Or at least give it no more attention than we do the Beast Wars 0.0 story. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:12, 24 October 2009 (EDT)		:I '''really''' want to ignore this stupidity. Or at least give it no more attention than we do the Beast Wars 0.0 story. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:12, 24 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::US BW is EXPLICITLY a Time-Travel story. BW II explicitly takes place on future Earth (Gaea), and US BW explicitly takes place on Past-Earth with the main characters having travelled back in time from future-Cybertron. That's some very elegant, and I'm sure intentional, symmetry, and has to be given some credence. Whether TM2 Cybershark is off in space (at whatever time) fighting BWII Space-Pirate Seacons or not, the main-casts are definitely not in the same time period. At least not without the IDW Profile retconning, which I admidtedly don't know anything about. But I would think the original source material would take precedence. But in any event, soke continuity seperation (IDW material and toy-packaging references Cybershark, Magmatron, etc. vs. original Japanese animation) is probably neccessary.~~--[[~~User:Destrongerlupus\|Destrongerlupus]] 17:19, 18 November 2010 (EST)		:::US BW is EXPLICITLY a Time-Travel story. BW II explicitly takes place on future Earth (Gaea), and US BW explicitly takes place on Past-Earth with the main characters having travelled back in time from future-Cybertron. That's some very elegant, and I'm sure intentional, symmetry, and has to be given some credence. Whether TM2 Cybershark is off in space (at whatever time) fighting BWII Space-Pirate Seacons or not, the main-casts are definitely not in the same time period. At least not without the IDW Profile retconning, which I admidtedly don't know anything about. But I would think the original source material would take precedence. But in any event, soke continuity seperation (IDW material and toy-packaging references Cybershark, Magmatron, etc. vs. original Japanese animation) is probably neccessary. User:Destrongerlupus\|Destrongerlupus]] 17:19, 18 November 2010 (EST)

	==Quintessons==		==Quintessons==

	It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

Destrongerlupus: /* Confusion? */

2010-11-18T22:21:43Z

Confusion?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 18 November 2010
Line 43:		Line 43:
	:The Japanese timeline placing BWNeo and BWII as thousands of years later seems to be trying to fix the problems with them co-existing witht he US BW stuff... while ignoring all the little references (on both sides) that essentially '''demand''' they take place in the same time period, and creating much huger problems by putting them in the future.		:The Japanese timeline placing BWNeo and BWII as thousands of years later seems to be trying to fix the problems with them co-existing witht he US BW stuff... while ignoring all the little references (on both sides) that essentially '''demand''' they take place in the same time period, and creating much huger problems by putting them in the future.
	:I '''really''' want to ignore this stupidity. Or at least give it no more attention than we do the Beast Wars 0.0 story. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:12, 24 October 2009 (EDT)		:I '''really''' want to ignore this stupidity. Or at least give it no more attention than we do the Beast Wars 0.0 story. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:12, 24 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::US BW is EXPLICITLY a Time-Travel story. BW II explicitly takes place on future Earth (Gaea), and US BW explicitly takes place on Past-Earth with the main characters having travelled back in time from future-Cybertron. Whether TM2 Cybershark is off in space (at whatever time) fighting BWII Space-Pirate Seacons or not, the main-casts are definitely not in the same time period. At least not without the IDW Profile retconning, which I admidtedly don't know anything about. But I would think the original source material would take precedence. But in any event, soke continuity seperation (IDW material and toy-packaging references Cybershark, Magmatron, etc. vs. original Japanese animation) is probably neccessary.--[[User:Destrongerlupus\|Destrongerlupus]] 17:19, 18 November 2010 (EST)		:::US BW is EXPLICITLY a Time-Travel story. BW II explicitly takes place on future Earth (Gaea), and US BW explicitly takes place on Past-Earth with the main characters having travelled back in time from future-Cybertron. That's some very elegant, and I'm sure intentional, symmetry, and has to be given some credence. Whether TM2 Cybershark is off in space (at whatever time) fighting BWII Space-Pirate Seacons or not, the main-casts are definitely not in the same time period. At least not without the IDW Profile retconning, which I admidtedly don't know anything about. But I would think the original source material would take precedence. But in any event, soke continuity seperation (IDW material and toy-packaging references Cybershark, Magmatron, etc. vs. original Japanese animation) is probably neccessary.--[[User:Destrongerlupus\|Destrongerlupus]] 17:19, 18 November 2010 (EST)

	==Quintessons==		==Quintessons==

	It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)		It would seem worth mentioning that the original Predacons and Sky-Byte were created by the Quints in cartoon continuity, plus they'd get a little green angry face in the corner. [[User:Terrortron\|Terrortron]] 14:40, 21 July 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 7 July 2021
Line 57:		Line 57:
	::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::I'm definitely in favor of folding RID Preds into BW Preds, and having the Destrongers get their own page in the same vein as the Dimension Patrol. [[User:TransFormersfan1\|TransFormersfan1]] ([[User talk:TransFormersfan1\|talk]]) 18:34, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		:::I'm definitely in favor of folding RID Preds into BW Preds, and having the Destrongers get their own page in the same vein as the Dimension Patrol. [[User:TransFormersfan1\|TransFormersfan1]] ([[User talk:TransFormersfan1\|talk]]) 18:34, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
			::::The thing about the Destrongers is that the show never really addressed the name difference, never explained if it referred to the whole faction (like if the Destron faction just changed its name to the Destronger faction but still kept the same insignia and such) or if it only referred to Gigatron's specific team. Either way, the Destrongers were functionally identical to the Destrons/Predacons of the Beast Era, so I'd say it's ambiguous enough to just cover the Destrongers on the Predacon page proper. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 19:10, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 7 July 2021
Line 56:		Line 56:
	: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
			:::I'm definitely in favor of folding RID Preds into BW Preds, and having the Destrongers get their own page in the same vein as the Dimension Patrol. [[User:TransFormersfan1\|TransFormersfan1]] ([[User talk:TransFormersfan1\|talk]]) 18:34, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 7 July 2021
Line 55:		Line 55:
	I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise'' continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 7 July 2021
Line 55:		Line 55:
	I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		I've put together a sandbox for a merger of this page and the "Predacon (RID)" page: [[User:Riptide/Sandbox:Predacons]]. I've tried to preserve as much of the information from this iteration as possible while leaving out the very "early-wiki" speculation and fluff. If anyone has any issues with me taking this live, please say so! --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 14:58, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
	: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)		: Definitely yes. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (EDT)
			::I was originally against this, but after thinking it over, if the Predacons of ''Rise of the Beasts'' are, in all likelihood, going to also be using the BW Predacon symbol and thus also be put on this page, then I'm okay with merging the RID Predacons into this as long as the intro is all-encompassing enough to account for the RID Predacons' unique qualities not shared by the BW Predacons (namely that the RID Predacons are the default version of their faction, having never been an offshoot of a preexisting Decepticon faction, since the RID Decepticons are instead a subgroup of the RID Predacons first created on Earth), and that we also note these unique aspects in the "2001 ''Robots in Disguise continuity" section. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:11, 7 July 2021 (EDT)