Talk:Rage (BW) - Revision history

Saix: clean up, replaced: (BWN) → (BW) (5)

2021-11-04T21:46:24Z

clean up, replaced: (BWN) → (BW) (5)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 4 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Untitled==
	Was this also an episode of the Anime? It's been literally ages isnce I watched neo, but I have the encodes, (lousy quality) and could probably get a better pic/summary if someone has an episode #/title. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 18:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)		Was this also an episode of the Anime? It's been literally ages isnce I watched neo, but I have the encodes, (lousy quality) and could probably get a better pic/summary if someone has an episode #/title. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 18:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Line 29:		Line 30:
	:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "Rāge" and "Rage (BWN)" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. Rage (BW) is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::::So... barring further discussion, I'll go ahead and make the move. (I mean, I know it's my character, but geeze, sometimes someone just needs to put in the work.) --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 12:58, 4 June 2017 (EDT)		::::So... barring further discussion, I'll go ahead and make the move. (I mean, I know it's my character, but geeze, sometimes someone just needs to put in the work.) --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 12:58, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Saix: Saix moved page Talk:Rage (BWN) to Talk:Rage (BW)

2021-09-19T17:32:03Z

Saix moved page Talk:Rage (BWN) to Talk:Rage (BW)

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:32, 19 September 2021
(No difference)

Abates: Abates moved page Talk:Rāge to Talk:Rage (BWN)

2017-06-18T21:39:41Z

Abates moved page Talk:Rāge to Talk:Rage (BWN)

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:39, 18 June 2017
(No difference)

Jimsorenson: /* Vote */

2017-06-04T16:58:35Z

Vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 4 June 2017
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			::::So... barring further discussion, I'll go ahead and make the move. (I mean, I know it's my character, but geeze, sometimes someone just needs to put in the work.) --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 12:58, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Broadside: /* Vote */

2017-01-22T21:27:58Z

Vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 22 January 2017
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)

Giggidy: /* Vote */

2017-01-22T16:58:26Z

Vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 22 January 2017
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)

Xaaron at 15:24, 22 January 2017

2017-01-22T15:24:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 22 January 2017
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)

Xaaron: /* Vote */

2017-01-22T15:20:05Z

Vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 22 January 2017
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)

Giggidy: /* Vote */

2017-01-22T14:38:34Z

Vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 22 January 2017
Line 28:		Line 28:
	::Why are we voting when there has been no discussion on the move notice for a month? And isn't our policy 100% crystal clear that English names take priority? Is that policy changing? Do you have any argument other than just weeaboo wanting to keep a name that's impossible to actually write out without cutting and pasting or memorizing keyboard shortcuts that almost no one uses? [[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 07:50, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::Why are we voting when there has been no discussion on the move notice for a month? And isn't our policy 100% crystal clear that English names take priority? Is that policy changing? Do you have any argument other than just weeaboo wanting to keep a name that's impossible to actually write out without cutting and pasting or memorizing keyboard shortcuts that almost no one uses? [[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 07:50, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)

Sabrblade: /* Vote */

2017-01-22T14:02:31Z

Vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 22 January 2017
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:Count me for keep. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 04:05, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:Count me for keep. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 04:05, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::Why are we voting when there has been no discussion on the move notice for a month? And isn't our policy 100% crystal clear that English names take priority? Is that policy changing? Do you have any argument other than just weeaboo wanting to keep a name that's impossible to actually write out without cutting and pasting or memorizing keyboard shortcuts that almost no one uses? [[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 07:50, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::Why are we voting when there has been no discussion on the move notice for a month? And isn't our policy 100% crystal clear that English names take priority? Is that policy changing? Do you have any argument other than just weeaboo wanting to keep a name that's impossible to actually write out without cutting and pasting or memorizing keyboard shortcuts that almost no one uses? [[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 07:50, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 4 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Untitled==
	Was this also an episode of the Anime? It's been literally ages isnce I watched neo, but I have the encodes, (lousy quality) and could probably get a better pic/summary if someone has an episode #/title. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 18:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)		Was this also an episode of the Anime? It's been literally ages isnce I watched neo, but I have the encodes, (lousy quality) and could probably get a better pic/summary if someone has an episode #/title. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 18:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Line 29:		Line 30:
	:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "Rāge" and "Rage (BWN)" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. Rage (BW) is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::::So... barring further discussion, I'll go ahead and make the move. (I mean, I know it's my character, but geeze, sometimes someone just needs to put in the work.) --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 12:58, 4 June 2017 (EDT)		::::So... barring further discussion, I'll go ahead and make the move. (I mean, I know it's my character, but geeze, sometimes someone just needs to put in the work.) --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 12:58, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 4 June 2017
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			::::So... barring further discussion, I'll go ahead and make the move. (I mean, I know it's my character, but geeze, sometimes someone just needs to put in the work.) --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 12:58, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 22 January 2017
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			:::Agreed with Giggidy, here. There are good reasons to ignore standards and bypass our systems, but this isn't enough of one. --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 16:27, 22 January 2017 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 22 January 2017
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)
			::No, Rage (BWN) is technically correct, based on our policy. Rāge would be an exception to currently established rules. On review I agree that Rage (BWN) is more aligned with our custom than Rage (BW). --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2017 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 22 January 2017
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:::There ''has'' been discussion... in [https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/101932-tfwikinet-thread-30/page-325#entry3425417 The Allspark Forums's TFWiki thread]. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 09:02, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)		::::Isn't that kind of bizarre. The arguments and reasons should be written out here, on the wiki, where there's a record of it. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 09:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)
	:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)		:I don't personally think it matters which is the header so long as both "[[Rāge]]" and "[[Rage (BWN)]]" are functional redirects to the page. Rāge is technically correct, but accommodations should be made to people who don't have special character shortcuts. [[Rage (BW)]] is definitely wrong, though, because (BWN) is her franchise of origin. Even when we adjust pages to English-name first, the original franchise remains, re: [[Ricochet (Headmasters)]], not [[Ricochet (Commemorative Series)]]. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 10:20, 22 January 2017 (EST)