Talk:Rail gun - Revision history

Repowers: /* G2 too */ ooph, stupid timeout errors

2011-04-19T00:51:50Z

G2 too: ooph, stupid timeout errors

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 19 April 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	This article also needs to cover G2 Megatron's shoulder weapon. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:37, 18 April 2011 (EDT)		This article also needs to cover G2 Megatron's shoulder weapon. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:37, 18 April 2011 (EDT)

	~~== G2 too ==~~

	~~This article also needs to cover G2 Megatron's shoulder weapon. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:50, 18 April 2011 (EDT)~~

Repowers: /* G2 too */ new section

2011-04-19T00:50:38Z

G2 too: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 19 April 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	This article also needs to cover G2 Megatron's shoulder weapon. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:37, 18 April 2011 (EDT)		This article also needs to cover G2 Megatron's shoulder weapon. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:37, 18 April 2011 (EDT)

			== G2 too ==

			This article also needs to cover G2 Megatron's shoulder weapon. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:50, 18 April 2011 (EDT)

Repowers: /* G2 too */ new section

2011-04-19T00:37:11Z

G2 too: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 19 April 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:They sound like the same thing. The same thing can have slightly different origins in different fictions. I don't think that is a problem. That is why there are "differences with the movie" sections. I agree with a merge. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:00, 9 March 2010 (EST)		:They sound like the same thing. The same thing can have slightly different origins in different fictions. I don't think that is a problem. That is why there are "differences with the movie" sections. I agree with a merge. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:00, 9 March 2010 (EST)
	:If we're going to merge, ''this'' should be the primary. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 17:23, 9 March 2010 (EST)		:If we're going to merge, ''this'' should be the primary. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 17:23, 9 March 2010 (EST)

			== G2 too ==

			This article also needs to cover G2 Megatron's shoulder weapon. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:37, 18 April 2011 (EDT)

ZeldaTheSwordsman at 22:23, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T22:23:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 9 March 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	This was developed from examining Megatron. Note that in the film, it was stated the Autobots ''weren't'' sharing weapons tech. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 11:34, 9 March 2010 (EST)		This was developed from examining Megatron. Note that in the film, it was stated the Autobots ''weren't'' sharing weapons tech. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 11:34, 9 March 2010 (EST)
	:They sound like the same thing. The same thing can have slightly different origins in different fictions. I don't think that is a problem. That is why there are "differences with the movie" sections. I agree with a merge. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:00, 9 March 2010 (EST)		:They sound like the same thing. The same thing can have slightly different origins in different fictions. I don't think that is a problem. That is why there are "differences with the movie" sections. I agree with a merge. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:00, 9 March 2010 (EST)
			:If we're going to merge, ''this'' should be the primary. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 17:23, 9 March 2010 (EST)

Starfield: /* Axiom merge */

2010-03-09T17:00:39Z

Axiom merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 9 March 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	This was developed from examining Megatron. Note that in the film, it was stated the Autobots ''weren't'' sharing weapons tech. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 11:34, 9 March 2010 (EST)		This was developed from examining Megatron. Note that in the film, it was stated the Autobots ''weren't'' sharing weapons tech. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 11:34, 9 March 2010 (EST)
			:They sound like the same thing. The same thing can have slightly different origins in different fictions. I don't think that is a problem. That is why there are "differences with the movie" sections. I agree with a merge. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:00, 9 March 2010 (EST)

ZeldaTheSwordsman: /* Axiom merge */

2010-03-09T16:34:23Z

Axiom merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 9 March 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The game also give it the same backstory of co-development. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:24, 8 February 2010 (EST)		The game also give it the same backstory of co-development. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:24, 8 February 2010 (EST)

			This was developed from examining Megatron. Note that in the film, it was stated the Autobots ''weren't'' sharing weapons tech. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 11:34, 9 March 2010 (EST)

Derik: /* Axiom merge */ new section

2010-02-08T19:24:56Z

Axiom merge: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 8 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Well, the novel and the linked Popular Mechanics article call it "rail gun." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 07:53, 23 November 2009 (EST)		:Well, the novel and the linked Popular Mechanics article call it "rail gun." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 07:53, 23 November 2009 (EST)
	::Well, it seems that sources interchangeably use both names. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 09:10, 23 November 2009 (EST)		::Well, it seems that sources interchangeably use both names. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 09:10, 23 November 2009 (EST)

			== Axiom merge ==

			I'd like to see this merged with the [[Axiom Gun]] article, since the gun in the game... er... is the same thing. It's mounted on various platforms (ship, rail, fixed...) but it really does seem to be the same project, and I'm PRETTY SURE they call it the Axiom Rail Gun in the game at some point (Or at least the guidebook)-- it's just the name of the project.

			The game also give it the same backstory of co-development. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 14:24, 8 February 2010 (EST)

-Blackout- at 14:10, 23 November 2009

2009-11-23T14:10:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 23 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I would like to point out that the proper name for the weapon is "railgun", and this should therefore be moved. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 05:50, 23 November 2009 (EST)		I would like to point out that the proper name for the weapon is "railgun", and this should therefore be moved. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 05:50, 23 November 2009 (EST)
	:Well, the novel and the linked Popular Mechanics article call it "rail gun." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 07:53, 23 November 2009 (EST)		:Well, the novel and the linked Popular Mechanics article call it "rail gun." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 07:53, 23 November 2009 (EST)
			::Well, it seems that sources interchangeably use both names. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 09:10, 23 November 2009 (EST)

Starfield at 12:53, 23 November 2009

2009-11-23T12:53:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 23 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I would like to point out that the proper name for the weapon is "railgun", and this should therefore be moved. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 05:50, 23 November 2009 (EST)		I would like to point out that the proper name for the weapon is "railgun", and this should therefore be moved. --[[User:-Blackout-\|-Blackout-]] 05:50, 23 November 2009 (EST)
			:Well, the novel and the linked Popular Mechanics article call it "rail gun." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 07:53, 23 November 2009 (EST)

-Blackout-: New page: I would like to point out that the proper name for the weapon is "railgun", and this should therefore be moved. --~~~~

2009-11-23T10:50:00Z

New page: I would like to point out that the proper name for the weapon is "railgun", and this should therefore be moved. --~~~~

New page

I would like to point out that the proper name for the weapon is "railgun", and this should therefore be moved. --[[User:-Blackout-|-Blackout-]] 05:50, 23 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 9 March 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	This was developed from examining Megatron. Note that in the film, it was stated the Autobots ''weren't'' sharing weapons tech. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 11:34, 9 March 2010 (EST)		This was developed from examining Megatron. Note that in the film, it was stated the Autobots ''weren't'' sharing weapons tech. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 11:34, 9 March 2010 (EST)
	:They sound like the same thing. The same thing can have slightly different origins in different fictions. I don't think that is a problem. That is why there are "differences with the movie" sections. I agree with a merge. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:00, 9 March 2010 (EST)		:They sound like the same thing. The same thing can have slightly different origins in different fictions. I don't think that is a problem. That is why there are "differences with the movie" sections. I agree with a merge. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:00, 9 March 2010 (EST)
			:If we're going to merge, ''this'' should be the primary. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 17:23, 9 March 2010 (EST)