Talk:Ramjet (Animated) - Revision history

Khajidha: /* Removing all "no and not" */

2015-03-04T13:30:57Z

Removing all "no and not"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 4 March 2015
Line 116:		Line 116:
	There are a lot of sentences using not such as: Ramjet can't transform, and is not redecoed to..., is not a Decepticons and many others.		There are a lot of sentences using not such as: Ramjet can't transform, and is not redecoed to..., is not a Decepticons and many others.
	It can make readers confused although it's meant to be humourous. Should it be removed?		It can make readers confused although it's meant to be humourous. Should it be removed?
			:No. First, it IS funny. Second, any confusion about this reflects the English comprehension skills of the reader. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 08:30, 4 March 2015 (EST)

Pat: /* Removing all nots and nos */

2015-03-04T12:45:13Z

Removing all nots and nos

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:45, 4 March 2015
Line 112:		Line 112:
	:Well, the character has the Decepticon symbol on him anyway, so you could say it's the one thing he doesn't lie about. Or that it's only what he ''says'' that's a lie, not what he displays. Either way, it wouldn't really be that good a gag. --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 14:56, 20 January 2013 (EST)		:Well, the character has the Decepticon symbol on him anyway, so you could say it's the one thing he doesn't lie about. Or that it's only what he ''says'' that's a lie, not what he displays. Either way, it wouldn't really be that good a gag. --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 14:56, 20 January 2013 (EST)

	== Removing all ~~nots~~ and ~~nos~~ ==		== Removing all "no and not" ==

	There are ~~alot~~ of sentences using not such as, Ramjet can't transform and is not redecoed to .....		There are a lot of sentences using not such as: Ramjet can't transform, and is not redecoed to..., is not a Decepticons and many others.
	It can make readers confused although it's meant to be humourous. Should it be removed?		It can make readers confused although it's meant to be humourous. Should it be removed?

Pat: /* Removing all nots and nos */ new section

2015-03-04T12:40:19Z

Removing all nots and nos: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 4 March 2015
Line 111:		Line 111:
	Since this article is full of lies, don't you think we should replace the Decepticon logo at the top of the page with an Autobot logo that links to the Decepticon page?[[Special:Contributions/71.255.172.248\|71.255.172.248]] 14:19, 21 April 2012 (EDT)		Since this article is full of lies, don't you think we should replace the Decepticon logo at the top of the page with an Autobot logo that links to the Decepticon page?[[Special:Contributions/71.255.172.248\|71.255.172.248]] 14:19, 21 April 2012 (EDT)
	:Well, the character has the Decepticon symbol on him anyway, so you could say it's the one thing he doesn't lie about. Or that it's only what he ''says'' that's a lie, not what he displays. Either way, it wouldn't really be that good a gag. --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 14:56, 20 January 2013 (EST)		:Well, the character has the Decepticon symbol on him anyway, so you could say it's the one thing he doesn't lie about. Or that it's only what he ''says'' that's a lie, not what he displays. Either way, it wouldn't really be that good a gag. --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 14:56, 20 January 2013 (EST)

			== Removing all nots and nos ==

			There are alot of sentences using not such as, Ramjet can't transform and is not redecoed to .....
			It can make readers confused although it's meant to be humourous. Should it be removed?

Flicky1991: /* Autobot */

2013-01-20T19:56:29Z

Autobot

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 20 January 2013
Line 110:		Line 110:

	Since this article is full of lies, don't you think we should replace the Decepticon logo at the top of the page with an Autobot logo that links to the Decepticon page?[[Special:Contributions/71.255.172.248\|71.255.172.248]] 14:19, 21 April 2012 (EDT)		Since this article is full of lies, don't you think we should replace the Decepticon logo at the top of the page with an Autobot logo that links to the Decepticon page?[[Special:Contributions/71.255.172.248\|71.255.172.248]] 14:19, 21 April 2012 (EDT)
			:Well, the character has the Decepticon symbol on him anyway, so you could say it's the one thing he doesn't lie about. Or that it's only what he ''says'' that's a lie, not what he displays. Either way, it wouldn't really be that good a gag. --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 14:56, 20 January 2013 (EST)

71.255.172.248: /* Autobot */ new section

2012-04-21T18:19:47Z

Autobot: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 21 April 2012
Line 106:		Line 106:
	::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)		::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
	:::Kids aren't dumb. The joke isn't exactly a subtle one. They'll be fine. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 19:26, 28 July 2011 (EDT)		:::Kids aren't dumb. The joke isn't exactly a subtle one. They'll be fine. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 19:26, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

			== Autobot ==

			Since this article is full of lies, don't you think we should replace the Decepticon logo at the top of the page with an Autobot logo that links to the Decepticon page?[[Special:Contributions/71.255.172.248\|71.255.172.248]] 14:19, 21 April 2012 (EDT)

Detour: /* Lies */

2011-07-28T23:26:05Z

Lies

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 28 July 2011
Line 105:		Line 105:
	: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)		: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)
	::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)		::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
			:::Kids aren't dumb. The joke isn't exactly a subtle one. They'll be fine. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 19:26, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

24.13.125.86: /* Lies */

2011-07-28T23:18:40Z

Lies

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 28 July 2011
Line 104:		Line 104:
	--[[User:Metroplex\|Metroplex]] 15:46, 20 May 2011 (EDT)		--[[User:Metroplex\|Metroplex]] 15:46, 20 May 2011 (EDT)
	: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)		: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)
			::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* Lies */

2011-05-20T20:16:01Z

Lies

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 20 May 2011
Line 103:		Line 103:

	--[[User:Metroplex\|Metroplex]] 15:46, 20 May 2011 (EDT)		--[[User:Metroplex\|Metroplex]] 15:46, 20 May 2011 (EDT)
			: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)

Metroplex: /* Lies */ new section

2011-05-20T19:46:21Z

Lies: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 20 May 2011
Line 97:		Line 97:
	I'm new(ish) here and I'm not quite certain what a "featured" article is, but if it's just an article that is considered one of the wiki's finest, then I think this should surely be noted as such. I applaud all who were involved in writing it (that being said, it seems most of Screamer's clones get such articles).		I'm new(ish) here and I'm not quite certain what a "featured" article is, but if it's just an article that is considered one of the wiki's finest, then I think this should surely be noted as such. I applaud all who were involved in writing it (that being said, it seems most of Screamer's clones get such articles).
	<br>- [[User:Queso\|¡Usa El Queso!]] 9:48 PM, 15 February 2011 A.D.		<br>- [[User:Queso\|¡Usa El Queso!]] 9:48 PM, 15 February 2011 A.D.

			== Lies ==

			I know the article was written with purposes of being Sarcastic, but I think that anyone who has never saw the cartoon before would think of us as the liars, not the character itself

			--[[User:Metroplex\|Metroplex]] 15:46, 20 May 2011 (EDT)

Queso: /* Featured? */ new section

2011-02-16T02:56:44Z

Featured?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 16 February 2011
Line 92:		Line 92:
	==Activator==		==Activator==
	Does anyone have a toy of this we can put up? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 16:42, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		Does anyone have a toy of this we can put up? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 16:42, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

			== Featured? ==

			I'm new(ish) here and I'm not quite certain what a "featured" article is, but if it's just an article that is considered one of the wiki's finest, then I think this should surely be noted as such. I applaud all who were involved in writing it (that being said, it seems most of Screamer's clones get such articles).
			<br>- [[User:Queso\|¡Usa El Queso!]] 9:48 PM, 15 February 2011 A.D.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 28 July 2011
Line 105:		Line 105:
	: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)		: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)
	::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)		::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
			:::Kids aren't dumb. The joke isn't exactly a subtle one. They'll be fine. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 19:26, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 28 July 2011
Line 104:		Line 104:
	--[[User:Metroplex\|Metroplex]] 15:46, 20 May 2011 (EDT)		--[[User:Metroplex\|Metroplex]] 15:46, 20 May 2011 (EDT)
	: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)		: Even without context, if someone gets through this page and they don't pick up on the joke, they're too too dumb to live. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:16, 20 May 2011 (EDT)
			::Even the children that the cartoon is theoretically for?[[Special:Contributions/24.13.125.86\|24.13.125.86]] 19:18, 28 July 2011 (EDT)