Talk:Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry - Revision history

Saix: clean up, replaced: → (11)

2016-03-12T19:44:01Z

clean up, replaced: → (11)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 12 March 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		==Untitled==
			I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::::And the Constructicons aren't all green in every universe, so why would he be thrown out for not being green if it wasn't G1? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:24, 13 April 2011 (EDT) (having fun arguing both sides of this)		::::And the Constructicons aren't all green in every universe, so why would he be thrown out for not being green if it wasn't G1? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:24, 13 April 2011 (EDT) (having fun arguing both sides of this)

Khajidha at 20:24, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T20:24:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 13 April 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			::::And the Constructicons aren't all green in every universe, so why would he be thrown out for not being green if it wasn't G1? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:24, 13 April 2011 (EDT) (having fun arguing both sides of this)

	== T.E.C.H.? ==		== T.E.C.H.? ==

	"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

Detour at 20:18, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T20:18:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 13 April 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

	== T.E.C.H.? ==		== T.E.C.H.? ==

	"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 19:12, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T19:12:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 13 April 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

	== T.E.C.H.? ==		== T.E.C.H.? ==

	"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

Khajidha at 19:11, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T19:11:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 13 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	== T.E.C.H.? ==		== T.E.C.H.? ==

	"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

Starfield: /* T.E.C.H.? */ new section

2011-04-13T19:07:24Z

T.E.C.H.?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 13 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

			== T.E.C.H.? ==

			"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

Detour at 19:04, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T19:04:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 13 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

ItsWalky: New page: I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Alig...

2011-04-13T18:55:40Z

New page: I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Alig...

New page

I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 12 March 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		==Untitled==
			I don't think this page should assume this is a G1 continuity family thing. The Hall of Fame profiles don't seem to be from any one continuity. (And if they are, they would be from "Aligned," especially with all of the constant talk of the "Great Exodus.") --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:55, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::::And the Constructicons aren't all green in every universe, so why would he be thrown out for not being green if it wasn't G1? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:24, 13 April 2011 (EDT) (having fun arguing both sides of this)		::::And the Constructicons aren't all green in every universe, so why would he be thrown out for not being green if it wasn't G1? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:24, 13 April 2011 (EDT) (having fun arguing both sides of this)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 13 April 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			::::And the Constructicons aren't all green in every universe, so why would he be thrown out for not being green if it wasn't G1? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:24, 13 April 2011 (EDT) (having fun arguing both sides of this)

	== T.E.C.H.? ==		== T.E.C.H.? ==

	"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 13 April 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			:::But there's more than just six Constructicons in G1 too! [[Hauler]] was an ex-Constructicon too, and then there's [[Gravedigger]] and [[Hightower (Classics)\|Hightower]]. As for the other items, they seem to be more sly nods than actually that thing they were in the other continuities. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:18, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

	== T.E.C.H.? ==		== T.E.C.H.? ==

	"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 13 April 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		:Well, thus far there's only one Erector, so it's kind of hard to put this in Aligned or anything else. It's like with Dinobot, really. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 15:04, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
	::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		::I don't even think we should have continuity notes on non-character pages. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:11, 13 April 2011 (EDT)
			::Dinobot's bio last year was much different from the other four bios presented. It was written in a completely different style. Erector's is written in the same style as the other bios from this year, with a definite "Aligned" bias. I mean, the whole point of Aligned (as stated by Aaron Archer) is to take the perceived best parts of all continuities and shove them together into a cohesive whole. Erector being the inventor of Armada Laserbeak and the Movie's Real Gear unmistakably plays into that world. Him being a former member of the Constructicons doesn't hurt, either, since in Aligned, the Constructicons aren't just the six guys that we know about, but also include dozens of other dudes. Erector's is a very Aligned bio, no mistake about it. At the very least, we should remove the continuity note at the top, since it claims something important that we can't support. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:12, 13 April 2011 (EDT)

	== T.E.C.H.? ==		== T.E.C.H.? ==

	"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)		"Real Gear Quick Action Weaponry" sounds kind of like it is describing [[T.E.C.H.]] It is weaponry, it is "real gear" and I wouldn't be surprised if it was "quick action." - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 15:07, 13 April 2011 (EDT)