Talk:Revenge of the Fallen (video games) - Revision history

Ironhide2000: /* Across the board protection? */

2012-02-23T02:00:39Z

Across the board protection?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 23 February 2012
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Wow, the pages for these ROTF games are becoming festering grounds for vandals to put in nonexistant characters or replacing existing ones with aforementionned nonexistants... These pages are iffy enough as it is without anons messing with them like that, any chance for some protection there? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:52, 4 January 2011 (EST)		Wow, the pages for these ROTF games are becoming festering grounds for vandals to put in nonexistant characters or replacing existing ones with aforementionned nonexistants... These pages are iffy enough as it is without anons messing with them like that, any chance for some protection there? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:52, 4 January 2011 (EST)
	:Given the amount of anons adding bizarre characters, I'm inclined to agree and have protected a bunch of articles. Let me know if I missed any that should be protected. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:10, 4 January 2011 (EST)		:Given the amount of anons adding bizarre characters, I'm inclined to agree and have protected a bunch of articles. Let me know if I missed any that should be protected. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:10, 4 January 2011 (EST)

			== Jolt? ==
			Jolt is not playable or featured that i know of. [[User:Ironhide2000\|Ironhide2000]]

Abates: /* Across the board protection? */

2011-01-05T03:10:09Z

Across the board protection?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:10, 5 January 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:

	Wow, the pages for these ROTF games are becoming festering grounds for vandals to put in nonexistant characters or replacing existing ones with aforementionned nonexistants... These pages are iffy enough as it is without anons messing with them like that, any chance for some protection there? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:52, 4 January 2011 (EST)		Wow, the pages for these ROTF games are becoming festering grounds for vandals to put in nonexistant characters or replacing existing ones with aforementionned nonexistants... These pages are iffy enough as it is without anons messing with them like that, any chance for some protection there? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:52, 4 January 2011 (EST)
			:Given the amount of anons adding bizarre characters, I'm inclined to agree and have protected a bunch of articles. Let me know if I missed any that should be protected. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 22:10, 4 January 2011 (EST)

Detour: /* Across the board protection? */ new section

2011-01-04T21:52:02Z

Across the board protection?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 4 January 2011
Line 37:		Line 37:

	[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)		[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

			== Across the board protection? ==

			Wow, the pages for these ROTF games are becoming festering grounds for vandals to put in nonexistant characters or replacing existing ones with aforementionned nonexistants... These pages are iffy enough as it is without anons messing with them like that, any chance for some protection there? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 16:52, 4 January 2011 (EST)

Detour: No, and you're horrible for asking.

2010-09-17T13:37:19Z

No, and you're horrible for asking.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 17 September 2010
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::For the 2007 games, we considered PC/Xbox360/PS3 to be "Console", as I recall. I think we should put consoles under one banner, but note differences where possible, and then split up the smaller consoles into sections (since some of them are under different titles, as I recall. Also, We should try to keep the games sections in character articles partly based on our fiction sections (so we still describe in past tense what they did and where they did it, rather than just going, I dunno, "Skids is a playable character blah blah". Seems too wikipedia for me. I apologise if I am making this sound confusing. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:30, 2 July 2009 (EDT)		::For the 2007 games, we considered PC/Xbox360/PS3 to be "Console", as I recall. I think we should put consoles under one banner, but note differences where possible, and then split up the smaller consoles into sections (since some of them are under different titles, as I recall. Also, We should try to keep the games sections in character articles partly based on our fiction sections (so we still describe in past tense what they did and where they did it, rather than just going, I dunno, "Skids is a playable character blah blah". Seems too wikipedia for me. I apologise if I am making this sound confusing. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:30, 2 July 2009 (EDT)
	:::You mean an "in-universe" perspective?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:36, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:::You mean an "in-universe" perspective?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:36, 4 July 2009 (EDT)


	~~== Free download ==~~
	~~I guess this has nothing to do with this page but does anyone know where to get a free download?~~

	== G1 ==		== G1 ==

	[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)		[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

58.152.139.60: /* Free download */

2010-09-17T09:38:00Z

Free download

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 17 September 2010
Line 36:		Line 36:

	== Free download ==		== Free download ==
	I guess this has nothing to do with this page but does anyone know where to get ~~afree~~ download?		I guess this has nothing to do with this page but does anyone know where to get a free download?

	== G1 ==		== G1 ==

	[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)		[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

58.152.139.60 at 09:37, 17 September 2010

2010-09-17T09:37:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 17 September 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::You mean an "in-universe" perspective?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:36, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:::You mean an "in-universe" perspective?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:36, 4 July 2009 (EDT)


			== Free download ==
			I guess this has nothing to do with this page but does anyone know where to get afree download?
	== G1 ==		== G1 ==

	[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)		[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

92.227.177.75: /* Stuff */ Added link to Bad Flip Blog, whose author is showing the concept art for game characters.

2009-08-25T06:44:40Z

Stuff: Added link to Bad Flip Blog, whose author is showing the concept art for game characters.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:44, 25 August 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Autobots- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder2.jpg		Autobots- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder2.jpg
	Decepticons- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder.jpg [[Special:Contributions/69.156.211.84\|69.156.211.84]] 07:11, 28 July 2009 (EDT)		Decepticons- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder.jpg [[Special:Contributions/69.156.211.84\|69.156.211.84]] 07:11, 28 July 2009 (EDT)

			Sorry, don't have time for editing, but the concept art IS online, with more coming every day: http://badflipblog.blogspot.com/ (this isn't me btw)

	== Different versions of the game need to be clarified? ==		== Different versions of the game need to be clarified? ==

Starfield: /* G1 */ new section

2009-08-25T03:41:39Z

G1: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:41, 25 August 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	::For the 2007 games, we considered PC/Xbox360/PS3 to be "Console", as I recall. I think we should put consoles under one banner, but note differences where possible, and then split up the smaller consoles into sections (since some of them are under different titles, as I recall. Also, We should try to keep the games sections in character articles partly based on our fiction sections (so we still describe in past tense what they did and where they did it, rather than just going, I dunno, "Skids is a playable character blah blah". Seems too wikipedia for me. I apologise if I am making this sound confusing. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:30, 2 July 2009 (EDT)		::For the 2007 games, we considered PC/Xbox360/PS3 to be "Console", as I recall. I think we should put consoles under one banner, but note differences where possible, and then split up the smaller consoles into sections (since some of them are under different titles, as I recall. Also, We should try to keep the games sections in character articles partly based on our fiction sections (so we still describe in past tense what they did and where they did it, rather than just going, I dunno, "Skids is a playable character blah blah". Seems too wikipedia for me. I apologise if I am making this sound confusing. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:30, 2 July 2009 (EDT)
	:::You mean an "in-universe" perspective?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:36, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		:::You mean an "in-universe" perspective?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] 14:36, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

			== G1 ==

			[http://transformersgame.com/news/1241/ So now] G1 Optimus Prime, Megatron, Starscream, Sunstorm and Movie Jazz are now "Revenge of the Fallen characters", right? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 23:41, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

69.156.211.84: /* Stuff */

2009-07-28T11:12:06Z

Stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 28 July 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:::The concept art doesn't refer to these guys by the G1 names at all. It says "Look, these are the characters we're taking as inspiration", but the individual pieces of art uniformly use the Subgroup Job names for each type of character, and I think it's misleading to call them by G1 names here - particuarly when we then have links from, for example, the Combaticon Sniper from the game to the combiner-limb Vortex from the toyline. And the Seekers aren't referred to as Thrust anywhere, despite that clearly being the inspiration for their deco. I think this needs to be changed to reflect the way the characters are used and referred to in the game itself. (And I haven't played through the Autobot campaign yet, so I don't know how many Stunticon types there are.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] 02:37, 2 July 2009 (EDT)		:::The concept art doesn't refer to these guys by the G1 names at all. It says "Look, these are the characters we're taking as inspiration", but the individual pieces of art uniformly use the Subgroup Job names for each type of character, and I think it's misleading to call them by G1 names here - particuarly when we then have links from, for example, the Combaticon Sniper from the game to the combiner-limb Vortex from the toyline. And the Seekers aren't referred to as Thrust anywhere, despite that clearly being the inspiration for their deco. I think this needs to be changed to reflect the way the characters are used and referred to in the game itself. (And I haven't played through the Autobot campaign yet, so I don't know how many Stunticon types there are.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] 02:37, 2 July 2009 (EDT)

	~~:::~~ Autobots- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder2.jpg		Autobots- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder2.jpg
	Decepticons- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder.jpg [[Special:Contributions/69.156.211.84\|69.156.211.84]] 07:11, 28 July 2009 (EDT)		Decepticons- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder.jpg [[Special:Contributions/69.156.211.84\|69.156.211.84]] 07:11, 28 July 2009 (EDT)

69.156.211.84: /* Stuff */

2009-07-28T11:11:47Z

Stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 28 July 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:::Aerialbots fight Starscream on the Deep-6 map--[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 01:10, 1 July 2009 (EDT)		:::Aerialbots fight Starscream on the Deep-6 map--[[User:Carrion\|Carrion]] 01:10, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
	:::The concept art doesn't refer to these guys by the G1 names at all. It says "Look, these are the characters we're taking as inspiration", but the individual pieces of art uniformly use the Subgroup Job names for each type of character, and I think it's misleading to call them by G1 names here - particuarly when we then have links from, for example, the Combaticon Sniper from the game to the combiner-limb Vortex from the toyline. And the Seekers aren't referred to as Thrust anywhere, despite that clearly being the inspiration for their deco. I think this needs to be changed to reflect the way the characters are used and referred to in the game itself. (And I haven't played through the Autobot campaign yet, so I don't know how many Stunticon types there are.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] 02:37, 2 July 2009 (EDT)		:::The concept art doesn't refer to these guys by the G1 names at all. It says "Look, these are the characters we're taking as inspiration", but the individual pieces of art uniformly use the Subgroup Job names for each type of character, and I think it's misleading to call them by G1 names here - particuarly when we then have links from, for example, the Combaticon Sniper from the game to the combiner-limb Vortex from the toyline. And the Seekers aren't referred to as Thrust anywhere, despite that clearly being the inspiration for their deco. I think this needs to be changed to reflect the way the characters are used and referred to in the game itself. (And I haven't played through the Autobot campaign yet, so I don't know how many Stunticon types there are.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] 02:37, 2 July 2009 (EDT)

			::: Autobots- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder2.jpg
			Decepticons- http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/qq33/RazorsawTF/cannonfodder.jpg [[Special:Contributions/69.156.211.84\|69.156.211.84]] 07:11, 28 July 2009 (EDT)

	== Different versions of the game need to be clarified? ==		== Different versions of the game need to be clarified? ==