Talk:Reverse-pretender technology - Revision history

KilMichaelMcC at 03:03, 7 October 2009

2009-10-07T03:03:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 7 October 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::Until you read the Allspark Almanac's introduction, which says that Reverse-pretender technology was last documented in 1980's Transformers commercials where humans disguised themselves as Ultra Magnus. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:56, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:::Until you read the Allspark Almanac's introduction, which says that Reverse-pretender technology was last documented in 1980's Transformers commercials where humans disguised themselves as Ultra Magnus. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:56, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			::::In that case, this article could use further clarification to that effect. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 23:03, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

FortMax: DYW

2009-10-07T02:56:41Z

DYW

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 7 October 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::Until you read the Allspark Almanac's introduction, which says that Reverse-pretender technology was last documented in 1980's Transformers commercials where humans disguised themselves as Ultra Magnus. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:56, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 02:55, 7 October 2009

2009-10-07T02:55:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 7 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:[[Reverse-pretender technology#Generation 1 commercials]] --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:37, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:[[Reverse-pretender technology#Generation 1 commercials]] --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:37, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

KilMichaelMcC at 02:44, 7 October 2009

2009-10-07T02:44:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 7 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''Oddly, reverse-pretender technology predates Pretender technology by several years.'' .... Whaaa...? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		''Oddly, reverse-pretender technology predates Pretender technology by several years.'' .... Whaaa...? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:[[Reverse-pretender technology#Generation 1 commercials]] --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:37, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:[[Reverse-pretender technology#Generation 1 commercials]] --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:37, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

FortMax at 02:37, 7 October 2009

2009-10-07T02:37:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 7 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''Oddly, reverse-pretender technology predates Pretender technology by several years.'' .... Whaaa...? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		''Oddly, reverse-pretender technology predates Pretender technology by several years.'' .... Whaaa...? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:[[Reverse-pretender technology#Generation 1 commercials]] --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:37, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

KilMichaelMcC: New page: ''Oddly, reverse-pretender technology predates Pretender technology by several years.'' .... Whaaa...? --~~~~

2009-10-07T02:10:52Z

New page: ''Oddly, reverse-pretender technology predates Pretender technology by several years.'' .... Whaaa...? --~~~~

New page

''Oddly, reverse-pretender technology predates Pretender technology by several years.'' .... Whaaa...? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:10, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 7 October 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::Until you read the Allspark Almanac's introduction, which says that Reverse-pretender technology was last documented in 1980's Transformers commercials where humans disguised themselves as Ultra Magnus. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:56, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:::Until you read the Allspark Almanac's introduction, which says that Reverse-pretender technology was last documented in 1980's Transformers commercials where humans disguised themselves as Ultra Magnus. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:56, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			::::In that case, this article could use further clarification to that effect. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 23:03, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 7 October 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::Until you read the Allspark Almanac's introduction, which says that Reverse-pretender technology was last documented in 1980's Transformers commercials where humans disguised themselves as Ultra Magnus. --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:56, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 7 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:[[Reverse-pretender technology#Generation 1 commercials]] --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:37, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		:[[Reverse-pretender technology#Generation 1 commercials]] --[[User:FortMax\|FortMax]] 22:37, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
	::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)		::Yeaaaaah, see, I think we're being ridiculous here. The idea that the kid looking into the camera at the end of a commercial with a silly effect "transforming" them into Magnus or Galvatron is something that should be treated as if it exists in-universe is wrong. Further labeling that with a term which, as far as I can see, was invented twenty years later for the Allspark Almanac, and ''then'' claiming that this predated Pretenders? This makes no sense to me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:44, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::We chronicle the information we have, not the information we want to have. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:55, 6 October 2009 (EDT)