Talk:Robot Resource - Revision history

Flicky1991 at 19:19, 6 August 2012

2012-08-06T19:19:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 6 August 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
	::::::Why wouldn't it fit? A one-line blurb about each game would fit... and is what this article pretty much has. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 07:04, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		::::::Why wouldn't it fit? A one-line blurb about each game would fit... and is what this article pretty much has. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 07:04, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
			=="First goal"?==
			Is it "first goal" or "first go"? [[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 15:19, 6 August 2012 (EDT)

Jeysie at 11:04, 22 October 2009

2009-10-22T11:04:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 22 October 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
			::::::Why wouldn't it fit? A one-line blurb about each game would fit... and is what this article pretty much has. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 07:04, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Thanos6 at 11:01, 22 October 2009

2009-10-22T11:01:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:01, 22 October 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
	::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Jeysie at 10:32, 22 October 2009

2009-10-22T10:32:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 22 October 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
			::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Thanos6 at 09:52, 22 October 2009

2009-10-22T09:52:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 22 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
	::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

FFN at 12:45, 20 October 2009

2009-10-20T12:45:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:45, 20 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's [[Robots Video Arcade]] article. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's [[Robots Video Arcade]] article. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
	*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
	::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource" anyway! --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

FFN at 12:43, 20 October 2009

2009-10-20T12:43:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 20 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's [[Robots Video Arcade]] article. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's [[Robots Video Arcade]] article. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
	*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
			::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource" anyway! --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

Thanos6 at 08:44, 20 October 2009

2009-10-20T08:44:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 20 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's [[Robots Video Arcade]] article. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's [[Robots Video Arcade]] article. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
			*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

FFN: New page: Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's Robots Video Arcade article. --~~~~

2009-10-20T08:32:31Z

New page: Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's Robots Video Arcade article. --~~~~

New page

Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's [[Robots Video Arcade]] article. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 22 October 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
			::::::Why wouldn't it fit? A one-line blurb about each game would fit... and is what this article pretty much has. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 07:04, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:01, 22 October 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
	::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::::Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 22 October 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
	:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)		:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
			::::I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 22 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		*That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.[[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
	::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)		::But nobody would ''ever'' search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
			:::We might as well delete the articles for [[Canyon Racer XL]] and [[Ninja Gladiator]] then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. [[User:Thanos6\|Thanos6]] 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)