Talk:Rules of Disengagement (issue) - Revision history

Nu-Priest: /* Errors */

2021-03-18T15:28:58Z

Errors

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 18 March 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:

	OK, have I missed something (quite possibly) but when Tarn says that one of their number is on The List, actually three of them are - Fulcrum, Grimlock, and Flywheels. Is this a deliberate thing and I've missed the explanation, or is it a whoopsie? [[User:That bluestreak\|That bluestreak]] ([[User talk:That bluestreak\|talk]]) 11:07, 18 March 2021 (EDT)		OK, have I missed something (quite possibly) but when Tarn says that one of their number is on The List, actually three of them are - Fulcrum, Grimlock, and Flywheels. Is this a deliberate thing and I've missed the explanation, or is it a whoopsie? [[User:That bluestreak\|That bluestreak]] ([[User talk:That bluestreak\|talk]]) 11:07, 18 March 2021 (EDT)
			:Tarn later says they work the List in order, and they were specifically hunting for Fulcrum. They probably didn't know Flywheels was even there (and they especially didn't know Grimlock was there.) --[[User:Nu-Priest\|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest\|talk]]) 11:28, 18 March 2021 (EDT)

That bluestreak: /* Errors */ new section

2021-03-18T15:07:02Z

Errors: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 18 March 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
	:::I thought that too, but in UK #82 when they're introduced it's sort of from behind them. So as Impactor says their names, the hammer dude is top left and anvil guy is bottom right. I think I'll just have to ask Simon. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 16:28, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		:::I thought that too, but in UK #82 when they're introduced it's sort of from behind them. So as Impactor says their names, the hammer dude is top left and anvil guy is bottom right. I think I'll just have to ask Simon. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 16:28, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

			== Errors ==

			OK, have I missed something (quite possibly) but when Tarn says that one of their number is on The List, actually three of them are - Fulcrum, Grimlock, and Flywheels. Is this a deliberate thing and I've missed the explanation, or is it a whoopsie? [[User:That bluestreak\|That bluestreak]] ([[User talk:That bluestreak\|talk]]) 11:07, 18 March 2021 (EDT)

StarWars Jedi: StarWars Jedi moved page Talk:Rules of Disengagement to Talk:Rules of Disengagement (issue)

2015-03-07T12:57:22Z

StarWars Jedi moved page Talk:Rules of Disengagement to Talk:Rules of Disengagement (issue)

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:57, 7 March 2015
(No difference)

Lonegamer78 at 09:41, 8 November 2012

2012-11-08T09:41:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 8 November 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Maybe this issue's Spinister is secretly Agent 113! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:09, 25 July 2012 (EDT)		: Maybe this issue's Spinister is secretly Agent 113! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:09, 25 July 2012 (EDT)

	For my money, I'd pick Vos as secret agent 113. Something about his secret language schtick that seems a little off. But there is also an outside chance the turbofox Helex has on a chain could be our mystery agent. It could be Steeljaw in disguise.		For my money, I'd pick Vos as secret agent 113. Something about his secret language schtick that seems a little off. But there is also an outside chance the turbofox Helex has on a chain could be our mystery agent. It could be Steeljaw in disguise. {{unsigned\|BlackKnight75\|23:21, July 25, 2012 (EDT)}}

	:Agent 113 has to be someone capable of shooting bots with a gun![[User:ZeroSD\|ZeroSD]] 04:04, 23 August 2012 (EDT)		:Agent 113 has to be someone capable of shooting bots with a gun! [[User:ZeroSD\|ZeroSD]] 04:04, 23 August 2012 (EDT)

	==Rack or Ruin==		==Rack or Ruin==

ZeroSD at 08:04, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T08:04:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 23 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:

	For my money, I'd pick Vos as secret agent 113. Something about his secret language schtick that seems a little off. But there is also an outside chance the turbofox Helex has on a chain could be our mystery agent. It could be Steeljaw in disguise.		For my money, I'd pick Vos as secret agent 113. Something about his secret language schtick that seems a little off. But there is also an outside chance the turbofox Helex has on a chain could be our mystery agent. It could be Steeljaw in disguise.

			:Agent 113 has to be someone capable of shooting bots with a gun![[User:ZeroSD\|ZeroSD]] 04:04, 23 August 2012 (EDT)

	==Rack or Ruin==		==Rack or Ruin==

Emvee: /* Rack or Ruin */

2012-08-01T20:28:26Z

Rack or Ruin

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 1 August 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
	::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
			:::I thought that too, but in UK #82 when they're introduced it's sort of from behind them. So as Impactor says their names, the hammer dude is top left and anvil guy is bottom right. I think I'll just have to ask Simon. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 16:28, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* Rack or Ruin */

2012-08-01T17:47:08Z

Rack or Ruin

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 1 August 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Until I came to edit this I was 100% sure that the dude with the anvil was Rack (as shown here) but now I can't find a single canon source to back me up. I mean, it make sense that the anvil is the "rack" and the hammer is the "ruin" and all, but was it ever explicitly mentioned? Letters page or somesuch? --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 10:34, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		Until I came to edit this I was 100% sure that the dude with the anvil was Rack (as shown here) but now I can't find a single canon source to back me up. I mean, it make sense that the anvil is the "rack" and the hammer is the "ruin" and all, but was it ever explicitly mentioned? Letters page or somesuch? --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 10:34, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
	:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
			::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

MistaTee: /* Rack or Ruin */

2012-08-01T16:44:08Z

Rack or Ruin

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 1 August 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	==Rack or Ruin==		==Rack or Ruin==
	Until I came to edit this I was 100% sure that the dude with the anvil was Rack (as shown here) but now I can't find a single canon source to back me up. I mean, it make sense that the anvil is the "rack" and the hammer is the "ruin" and all, but was it ever explicitly mentioned? Letters page or somesuch? --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 10:34, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		Until I came to edit this I was 100% sure that the dude with the anvil was Rack (as shown here) but now I can't find a single canon source to back me up. I mean, it make sense that the anvil is the "rack" and the hammer is the "ruin" and all, but was it ever explicitly mentioned? Letters page or somesuch? --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 10:34, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
			:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

Emvee at 14:34, 1 August 2012

2012-08-01T14:34:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 1 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:

	For my money, I'd pick Vos as secret agent 113. Something about his secret language schtick that seems a little off. But there is also an outside chance the turbofox Helex has on a chain could be our mystery agent. It could be Steeljaw in disguise.		For my money, I'd pick Vos as secret agent 113. Something about his secret language schtick that seems a little off. But there is also an outside chance the turbofox Helex has on a chain could be our mystery agent. It could be Steeljaw in disguise.

			==Rack or Ruin==
			Until I came to edit this I was 100% sure that the dude with the anvil was Rack (as shown here) but now I can't find a single canon source to back me up. I mean, it make sense that the anvil is the "rack" and the hammer is the "ruin" and all, but was it ever explicitly mentioned? Letters page or somesuch? --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 10:34, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

BlackKnight75 at 03:21, 26 July 2012

2012-07-26T03:21:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 26 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So if Spinister is in this issue of More than Meets the Eye, then the similar looking robot back on Cybertron is Spinster, his twin brother. Which would explain why everyone gets their names mixed up/mis-pronounced.		So if Spinister is in this issue of More than Meets the Eye, then the similar looking robot back on Cybertron is Spinster, his twin brother. Which would explain why everyone gets their names mixed up/mis-pronounced.
	: Maybe this issue's Spinister is secretly Agent 113! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:09, 25 July 2012 (EDT)		: Maybe this issue's Spinister is secretly Agent 113! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:09, 25 July 2012 (EDT)

			For my money, I'd pick Vos as secret agent 113. Something about his secret language schtick that seems a little off. But there is also an outside chance the turbofox Helex has on a chain could be our mystery agent. It could be Steeljaw in disguise.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 1 August 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
	::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
			:::I thought that too, but in UK #82 when they're introduced it's sort of from behind them. So as Impactor says their names, the hammer dude is top left and anvil guy is bottom right. I think I'll just have to ask Simon. --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 16:28, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 1 August 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Until I came to edit this I was 100% sure that the dude with the anvil was Rack (as shown here) but now I can't find a single canon source to back me up. I mean, it make sense that the anvil is the "rack" and the hammer is the "ruin" and all, but was it ever explicitly mentioned? Letters page or somesuch? --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 10:34, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		Until I came to edit this I was 100% sure that the dude with the anvil was Rack (as shown here) but now I can't find a single canon source to back me up. I mean, it make sense that the anvil is the "rack" and the hammer is the "ruin" and all, but was it ever explicitly mentioned? Letters page or somesuch? --[[User:Emvee\|Emvee]] 10:34, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
	:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		:None that I've seen. Maybe you could ask Simon on his blog, or James Roberts on the IDW boards/facebook.--[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
			::I've always just assumed Rack'n'Ruin were named (our) left-to-right. It'd make the most sense. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 13:47, 1 August 2012 (EDT)