Talk:Scavenger (ROTF) - Revision history

Optimusprimerotfrocks at 17:48, 16 September 2019

2019-09-16T17:48:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 16 September 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)		With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
	:It is a concept design used in two places, so I'd say both. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT)		:It is a concept design used in two places, so I'd say both. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT)

			Has anyone else noticed that leader scavenger's vehicle treads are in his bottom wheel?
			[[User:Optimusprimerotfrocks\|Optimusprimerotfrocks]] ([[User talk:Optimusprimerotfrocks\|talk]]) 13:48, 16 September 2019 (EDT)

Optimusprimerotfrocks: /* Studio series */

2019-04-11T00:38:47Z

Studio series

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 11 April 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)		With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
	:It is a concept design used in two places, so I'd say both. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT)		:It is a concept design used in two places, so I'd say both. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT)

	~~== Studio series ==~~

	~~Has scavenger's studio series number been confirmed yet~~
	~~[[User:Optimusprimerotfrocks\|Optimusprimerotfrocks]] ([[User talk:Optimusprimerotfrocks\|talk]]) 10:37, 10 April 2019 (EDT)~~

Optimusprimerotfrocks: /* Studio series */ new section

2019-04-10T14:37:19Z

Studio series: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 10 April 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)		With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
	:It is a concept design used in two places, so I'd say both. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT)		:It is a concept design used in two places, so I'd say both. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT)

			== Studio series ==

			Has scavenger's studio series number been confirmed yet
			[[User:Optimusprimerotfrocks\|Optimusprimerotfrocks]] ([[User talk:Optimusprimerotfrocks\|talk]]) 10:37, 10 April 2019 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Ben Procter concept art image */

2009-09-18T20:35:57Z

Ben Procter concept art image

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 18 September 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Ben Procter concept art image==		==Ben Procter concept art image==
	With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)		With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
			:It is a concept design used in two places, so I'd say both. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT)

SFH: New section on concept art.

2009-09-18T19:39:32Z

New section on concept art.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 18 September 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)		:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
	::::Hasbro has owned the trademark to "[[Scavenger]]" for the last billion years. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 08:52, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		::::Hasbro has owned the trademark to "[[Scavenger]]" for the last billion years. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 08:52, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

			==Ben Procter concept art image==
			With regards to the [[Ben Procter]] concept art of the Scavenger/Demolishor body-type recently released, can we use that for Scavenger, or is it supposed to be Demolishot? The page itself lists it as "Wheelbot", nothing more. -- [[User:SFH\|SFH]] 15:39, 18 September 2009 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 12:52, 16 July 2009

2009-07-16T12:52:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 16 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)		:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
			::::Hasbro has owned the trademark to "[[Scavenger]]" for the last billion years. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 08:52, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

Geewunling at 12:39, 5 July 2009

2009-07-05T12:39:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 5 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)		:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)

Gearshift at 15:48, 14 June 2009

2009-06-14T15:48:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 14 June 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
			:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)

FFN at 21:20, 13 June 2009

2009-06-13T21:20:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 13 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hey guys. Scavenger doesn't have a toy but Demolishor does. Seeing that the page for G1 Sweeps says that you can fill in Scourge's toy with these characters (And guys as new as Shattered Glass characters with repourpoused toys have them on their page) could we say that Demolishor's toy could be repourpoused as Scavenger? Besides, the toy IS in Scavenger's colors, not Demolishor's...		Hey guys. Scavenger doesn't have a toy but Demolishor does. Seeing that the page for G1 Sweeps says that you can fill in Scourge's toy with these characters (And guys as new as Shattered Glass characters with repourpoused toys have them on their page) could we say that Demolishor's toy could be repourpoused as Scavenger? Besides, the toy IS in Scavenger's colors, not Demolishor's...
	:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
			::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)

Gearshift at 21:15, 13 June 2009

2009-06-13T21:15:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 13 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hey guys. Scavenger doesn't have a toy but Demolishor does. Seeing that the page for G1 Sweeps says that you can fill in Scourge's toy with these characters (And guys as new as Shattered Glass characters with repourpoused toys have them on their page) could we say that Demolishor's toy could be repourpoused as Scavenger? Besides, the toy IS in Scavenger's colors, not Demolishor's... [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 13:33, 12 June 2009 (EDT)		Hey guys. Scavenger doesn't have a toy but Demolishor does. Seeing that the page for G1 Sweeps says that you can fill in Scourge's toy with these characters (And guys as new as Shattered Glass characters with repourpoused toys have them on their page) could we say that Demolishor's toy could be repourpoused as Scavenger? Besides, the toy IS in Scavenger's colors, not Demolishor's...
			:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 16 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)		:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
			::::Hasbro has owned the trademark to "[[Scavenger]]" for the last billion years. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 08:52, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 5 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)		:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor (ROTF)\|Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 14 June 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		:Hey anyone? [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 17:15, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
	::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		::I don't think it needs to be said, since it's fairly obvious. And besides, Scavenger has two toys right there. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 17:20, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
			:::Yes, but it's probably that Hasbro didn't have the trademark for Scavenger and released HIS toy as [[Demolishor]]. [[User:Gearshift\|Gearshift]] 11:48, 14 June 2009 (EDT)