Talk:Scramble City (disambiguation) - Revision history

Khajidha at 13:59, 13 September 2010

2010-09-13T13:59:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 13 September 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::Then maybe this page should link to "Scramble Power" as a related-to or something. Because really, when we link to "Scramble City" when using it as an adjective... none of those actually are appropriate to the toy play pattern. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 17:11, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::Then maybe this page should link to "Scramble Power" as a related-to or something. Because really, when we link to "Scramble City" when using it as an adjective... none of those actually are appropriate to the toy play pattern. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 17:11, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			Coming back months later... I think we need to have a page somewhere (possibly a section on [[Diaclone]]) that goes into detail about what is known about the proposed Scramble City/Free Combination line and explains how it affected the TF toyline's development. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:59, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

M Sipher at 21:11, 16 June 2010

2010-06-16T21:11:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 16 June 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::Then maybe this page should link to "Scramble Power" as a related-to or something. Because really, when we link to "Scramble City" when using it as an adjective... none of those actually are appropriate to the toy play pattern. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 17:11, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

DrSpengler at 20:37, 16 June 2010

2010-06-16T20:37:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 16 June 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

NCZ at 19:59, 16 June 2010

2010-06-16T19:59:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 16 June 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I'd say that it can go there, perhaps as a note saying something akin to "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe the 1986 combiner teams". --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:42, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:I'd say that it can go there, perhaps as a note saying something akin to "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe the 1986 combiner teams". --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:42, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha at 19:58, 16 June 2010

2010-06-16T19:58:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 16 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since we are also using "Scramble City" as an adjective to describe a type of combiner, should not that term also be on here? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:33, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		Since we are also using "Scramble City" as an adjective to describe a type of combiner, should not that term also be on here? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:33, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	:I'd say that it can go there, perhaps as a note saying something akin to "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe the 1986 combiner teams". --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:42, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:I'd say that it can go there, perhaps as a note saying something akin to "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe the 1986 combiner teams". --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:42, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

NCZ at 19:42, 16 June 2010

2010-06-16T19:42:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 16 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since we are also using "Scramble City" as an adjective to describe a type of combiner, should not that term also be on here? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:33, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		Since we are also using "Scramble City" as an adjective to describe a type of combiner, should not that term also be on here? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 15:33, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			:I'd say that it can go there, perhaps as a note saying something akin to "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe the 1986 combiner teams". --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:42, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

M Sipher: New page: Since we are also using "Scramble City" as an adjective to describe a type of combiner, should not that term also be on here? --~~~~

2010-06-16T19:33:37Z

New page: Since we are also using "Scramble City" as an adjective to describe a type of combiner, should not that term also be on here? --~~~~

New page

Since we are also using "Scramble City" as an adjective to describe a type of combiner, should not that term also be on here? --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 15:33, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 13 September 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::Then maybe this page should link to "Scramble Power" as a related-to or something. Because really, when we link to "Scramble City" when using it as an adjective... none of those actually are appropriate to the toy play pattern. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 17:11, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::Then maybe this page should link to "Scramble Power" as a related-to or something. Because really, when we link to "Scramble City" when using it as an adjective... none of those actually are appropriate to the toy play pattern. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 17:11, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			Coming back months later... I think we need to have a page somewhere (possibly a section on [[Diaclone]]) that goes into detail about what is known about the proposed Scramble City/Free Combination line and explains how it affected the TF toyline's development. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 09:59, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 16 June 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::Then maybe this page should link to "Scramble Power" as a related-to or something. Because really, when we link to "Scramble City" when using it as an adjective... none of those actually are appropriate to the toy play pattern. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 17:11, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 16 June 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::I dunno, we already have an article for [[Scramble Power]], which covers the ''ability'' of Scramble City-style combiners. A separate article for that seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:37, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 16 June 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I'd say that it can go there, perhaps as a note saying something akin to "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe the 1986 combiner teams". --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:42, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		:I'd say that it can go there, perhaps as a note saying something akin to "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe the 1986 combiner teams". --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:42, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
	::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)		::Doesn't it also refer to the [[Terrorcon (G1)\|Terrocons]], [[Technobot (G1)\|Technobots]], and [[Seacon (G1)\|Seacons]]? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 15:58, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::It probably does, but I was just doing that off the top of my head and I'm less familiar with the later combiners. "'Scramble City combiner' is a term used to describe combiners with interchangeable parts." Maybe that'd be better. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 15:59, 16 June 2010 (EDT)