Talk:Shockblast - Revision history

Geewunling at 14:08, 29 May 2011

2011-05-29T14:08:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 29 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)		Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback (G1)\|Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)
	::There's no actual conflict in the namespace, which is the entire point of disambigs. Shockwave is still "Shockwave", regardless of what one minor toy was sold as. And "Shockblast" redirects to "Shockblast (Energon)" anyway. Why not just cut out the middleman and let the disambig template do its work? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)		::There's no actual conflict in the namespace, which is the entire point of disambigs. Shockwave is still "Shockwave", regardless of what one minor toy was sold as. And "Shockblast" redirects to "Shockblast (Energon)" anyway. Why not just cut out the middleman and let the disambig template do its work? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)
	:This is all part of Interrobang's hatred of redirects with disambiguation tags. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:34, 10 December 2010 (EST)		:This is all part of Interrobang's hatred of redirects with disambiguation tags. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:34, 10 December 2010 (EST)
	::That seems to be as relevant to the situation as your hatred of short character articles. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)		::That seems to be as relevant to the situation as your hatred of short character articles. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)

Interrobang at 21:45, 10 December 2010

2010-12-10T21:45:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 10 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)		Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)
			::There's no actual conflict in the namespace, which is the entire point of disambigs. Shockwave is still "Shockwave", regardless of what one minor toy was sold as. And "Shockblast" redirects to "Shockblast (Energon)" anyway. Why not just cut out the middleman and let the disambig template do its work? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)
	:This is all part of Interrobang's hatred of redirects with disambiguation tags. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:34, 10 December 2010 (EST)		:This is all part of Interrobang's hatred of redirects with disambiguation tags. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:34, 10 December 2010 (EST)
			::That seems to be as relevant to the situation as your hatred of short character articles. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)

Khajidha at 21:34, 10 December 2010

2010-12-10T21:34:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 10 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)		Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)
			:This is all part of Interrobang's hatred of redirects with disambiguation tags. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:34, 10 December 2010 (EST)

Abates: New page: Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because G1 Shockwave had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also Outback's name. --~~~~

2010-12-10T21:30:47Z

New page: Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because G1 Shockwave had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also Outback's name. --~~~~

New page

Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 29 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)		Isn't Energon Shockblast at "Shockblast (Energon)" because [[Shockwave (G1)/toys\|G1 Shockwave]] had a toy named Shockblast? Likewise "Fallback" is also [[Outback (G1)\|Outback]]'s name. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:30, 10 December 2010 (EST)
	::There's no actual conflict in the namespace, which is the entire point of disambigs. Shockwave is still "Shockwave", regardless of what one minor toy was sold as. And "Shockblast" redirects to "Shockblast (Energon)" anyway. Why not just cut out the middleman and let the disambig template do its work? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)		::There's no actual conflict in the namespace, which is the entire point of disambigs. Shockwave is still "Shockwave", regardless of what one minor toy was sold as. And "Shockblast" redirects to "Shockblast (Energon)" anyway. Why not just cut out the middleman and let the disambig template do its work? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)
	:This is all part of Interrobang's hatred of redirects with disambiguation tags. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:34, 10 December 2010 (EST)		:This is all part of Interrobang's hatred of redirects with disambiguation tags. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:34, 10 December 2010 (EST)
	::That seems to be as relevant to the situation as your hatred of short character articles. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)		::That seems to be as relevant to the situation as your hatred of short character articles. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:45, 10 December 2010 (EST)