Talk:Skullcruncher (G1) - Revision history

Wildstreak: /* Cuts */ new section

2021-05-12T12:42:43Z

Cuts: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 12 May 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

			== Cuts ==

			Been meaning to ask this (haven't gotten around to do that, unfortunately) but y'all got two small cuts on the legs ball joint socket? I wonder if this is like a minor widespread issue on all copies of the TR mold or not.[[User:Wildstreak\|Wildstreak]] ([[User talk:Wildstreak\|talk]]) 08:42, 12 May 2021 (EDT)

Gimmick: Undo revision 1118105 by Gimmick (talk)Eh. On second thought, I don't really want to know,

2016-08-10T03:19:56Z

Undo revision 1118105 by Gimmick (talk)Eh. On second thought, I don't really want to know,

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 10 August 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	::How does it work out that Skullcruncher is likely a trademark issue? I mean, what is the idea behind it? Is it that Hasbro doesn't think it can defend "Skullcruncher" as a Trademark for some reason, or there is some toy out there we aren't aware of named Skullcruncher? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 22:00, 9 August 2016 (EDT)

Gimmick: /* Skullsmasher trademark issues */

2016-08-10T02:00:09Z

Skullsmasher trademark issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 10 August 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			::How does it work out that Skullcruncher is likely a trademark issue? I mean, what is the idea behind it? Is it that Hasbro doesn't think it can defend "Skullcruncher" as a Trademark for some reason, or there is some toy out there we aren't aware of named Skullcruncher? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 22:00, 9 August 2016 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Skullsmasher trademark issues */

2016-08-08T13:34:26Z

Skullsmasher trademark issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 8 August 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

DrSpengler: /* Skullsmasher trademark issues */

2016-08-08T12:59:56Z

Skullsmasher trademark issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:59, 8 August 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

Xaaron: /* Skullsmasher trademark issues */

2016-08-08T12:54:58Z

Skullsmasher trademark issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 8 August 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I agree. I'm always a little irked when I read that. I'm sure there are cases where we've heard that from Hasbro officially, but I think the assumption is made too often without real evidence. It's possible, maybe even probable, but the assumptions are getting a bit too automatic for my tastes. -[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] ([[User talk:Crockalley\|talk]]) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (EDT)		:I agree. I'm always a little irked when I read that. I'm sure there are cases where we've heard that from Hasbro officially, but I think the assumption is made too often without real evidence. It's possible, maybe even probable, but the assumptions are getting a bit too automatic for my tastes. -[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] ([[User talk:Crockalley\|talk]]) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (EDT)
	::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Skullsmasher trademark issues */

2016-08-08T11:18:28Z

Skullsmasher trademark issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 8 August 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	"Name changed for trademark issues" seems to be the go-to reason the wiki gives whenever a character's name is changed. Does the wiki know trademark issues is the reason for Skullsmasher's name change, or is just assuming? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 18:56, 20 July 2016 (EDT)		"Name changed for trademark issues" seems to be the go-to reason the wiki gives whenever a character's name is changed. Does the wiki know trademark issues is the reason for Skullsmasher's name change, or is just assuming? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 18:56, 20 July 2016 (EDT)
	:I agree. I'm always a little irked when I read that. I'm sure there are cases where we've heard that from Hasbro officially, but I think the assumption is made too often without real evidence. It's possible, maybe even probable, but the assumptions are getting a bit too automatic for my tastes. -[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] ([[User talk:Crockalley\|talk]]) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (EDT)		:I agree. I'm always a little irked when I read that. I'm sure there are cases where we've heard that from Hasbro officially, but I think the assumption is made too often without real evidence. It's possible, maybe even probable, but the assumptions are getting a bit too automatic for my tastes. -[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] ([[User talk:Crockalley\|talk]]) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (EDT)
			::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

Crockalley: /* Skullsmasher trademark issues */

2016-08-08T01:59:43Z

Skullsmasher trademark issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 8 August 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:

	"Name changed for trademark issues" seems to be the go-to reason the wiki gives whenever a character's name is changed. Does the wiki know trademark issues is the reason for Skullsmasher's name change, or is just assuming? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 18:56, 20 July 2016 (EDT)		"Name changed for trademark issues" seems to be the go-to reason the wiki gives whenever a character's name is changed. Does the wiki know trademark issues is the reason for Skullsmasher's name change, or is just assuming? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 18:56, 20 July 2016 (EDT)
			:I agree. I'm always a little irked when I read that. I'm sure there are cases where we've heard that from Hasbro officially, but I think the assumption is made too often without real evidence. It's possible, maybe even probable, but the assumptions are getting a bit too automatic for my tastes. -[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] ([[User talk:Crockalley\|talk]]) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

Gimmick: /* Skullsmasher trademark issues */ new section

2016-07-20T22:56:17Z

Skullsmasher trademark issues: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 20 July 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Caption==		==Caption==
	The main image's caption's link is broken, so the caption is now completely unexplained. --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 04:39, 15 August 2012 (EDT)		The main image's caption's link is broken, so the caption is now completely unexplained. --[[User:Flicky1991\|Flicky1991]] 04:39, 15 August 2012 (EDT)

			== Skullsmasher trademark issues ==

			"Name changed for trademark issues" seems to be the go-to reason the wiki gives whenever a character's name is changed. Does the wiki know trademark issues is the reason for Skullsmasher's name change, or is just assuming? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 18:56, 20 July 2016 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Skullcruncher to Talk:Skullcruncher (G1)

2015-11-12T06:28:49Z

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Skullcruncher to Talk:Skullcruncher (G1)

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:28, 12 November 2015
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 10 August 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	::How does it work out that Skullcruncher is likely a trademark issue? I mean, what is the idea behind it? Is it that Hasbro doesn't think it can defend "Skullcruncher" as a Trademark for some reason, or there is some toy out there we aren't aware of named Skullcruncher? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 22:00, 9 August 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 10 August 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			::How does it work out that Skullcruncher is likely a trademark issue? I mean, what is the idea behind it? Is it that Hasbro doesn't think it can defend "Skullcruncher" as a Trademark for some reason, or there is some toy out there we aren't aware of named Skullcruncher? - [[User:Gimmick\|Gimmick]] ([[User talk:Gimmick\|talk]]) 22:00, 9 August 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 8 August 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			::I won't object if people want to put a "likely" or "presumably" in the notes (or adding an actual ref that it was for TM reasons0. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 09:34, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:59, 8 August 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
	:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			:While I agree that the likeliest reason is probably the truth, I also don't think that it would hurt for us to add a "likely" to the statement regarding name change. "Name likely changed for trademark issues". --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 08:59, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 8 August 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I agree. I'm always a little irked when I read that. I'm sure there are cases where we've heard that from Hasbro officially, but I think the assumption is made too often without real evidence. It's possible, maybe even probable, but the assumptions are getting a bit too automatic for my tastes. -[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] ([[User talk:Crockalley\|talk]]) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (EDT)		:I agree. I'm always a little irked when I read that. I'm sure there are cases where we've heard that from Hasbro officially, but I think the assumption is made too often without real evidence. It's possible, maybe even probable, but the assumptions are getting a bit too automatic for my tastes. -[[User:Crockalley\|Crockalley]] ([[User talk:Crockalley\|talk]]) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (EDT)
	::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)		::This is one assumption I am okay with. There aren't too many reasons Hasbro would change the name of a character as this makes it harder for them to build the characters as recognizable properties. The only other fairly common reason is unintended meanings (Slag, Slapper, Spastic, etc).--[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
			:::Or discouraged words for children's toys: ''Kill''bison, ''Death''saurus, ''Hell''bat, etc. --[[User:Xaaron\|Xaaron]] ([[User talk:Xaaron\|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (EDT)