Talk:Space (episode) - Revision history

Starfield: Talk:Space moved to Talk:Space (episode): Make way for space (the place)

2011-08-11T21:56:05Z

Talk:Space moved to Talk:Space (episode): Make way for space (the place)

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:56, 11 August 2011
(No difference)

Hooper X: /* Aliens... from outer space. */

2010-06-18T13:12:36Z

Aliens... from outer space.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 18 June 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	:In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I'm Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs IN China. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I'm Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs IN China. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
			::Some kind of... uh... prime directive... perhaps? (I hate myself.) [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:12, 18 June 2010 (EDT)

Lonegamer78: /* Aliens... from outer space. */

2010-06-18T02:05:17Z

Aliens... from outer space.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 18 June 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	:In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I ~~might look~~ Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I'm Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs IN China. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

Lonegamer78: /* Aliens... from outer space. */

2010-06-18T02:03:13Z

Aliens... from outer space.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 18 June 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I might look Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I might look Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

Lonegamer78: /* Aliens... from outer space. */

2010-06-18T02:02:31Z

Aliens... from outer space.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:02, 18 June 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
			In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I might look Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

Repowers: /* Aliens... from outer space. */ new section

2010-06-18T00:57:18Z

Aliens... from outer space.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 18 June 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? It was not an attempt to make the Cybertron articles "mine" - it's just that they were going to turn out that way because I happened to write be the one who wrote them. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? It was not an attempt to make the Cybertron articles "mine" - it's just that they were going to turn out that way because I happened to write be the one who wrote them. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

			== Aliens... from outer space. ==

			Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* Total Body Replacement? */

2010-06-17T21:21:14Z

Total Body Replacement?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 17 June 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? It was not an attempt to make the Cybertron articles "mine" - it's just that they were going to turn out that way because I happened to write be the one who wrote them. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

Chris McFeely at 21:19, 17 June 2010

2010-06-17T21:19:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 17 June 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

Lonegamer78: /* Total Body Replacement? */

2010-06-17T21:15:54Z

Total Body Replacement?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 17 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each ~~series/character~~ for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

Lonegamer78: /* Total Body Replacement? */

2010-06-17T21:15:25Z

Total Body Replacement?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 17 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each series/character for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 18 June 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		Did the show ever address the issue of why it was so important for Hot Shot and Red Alert to stay away from the natives? Or more to the point, is there anything about them that would actually make them stand out in any way from the locals? Couldn't Hot Shot just be some dude that Breakdown's never met before? Or did they cover this somehow? -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 20:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	:In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I'm Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs IN China. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:In ''Galaxy Force'', Optimus was rather gung-ho on "no interaction with the natives", making me think that he didn't want to drag the natives into something that wasn't their problem. As for making them stand out, completely different culture is one big flag - I'm Chinese and can speak the two main languages, but I have little to no clue regarding the local customs IN China. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 22:02, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
			::Some kind of... uh... prime directive... perhaps? (I hate myself.) [[User:Hooper X\|-hx]] 09:12, 18 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 17 June 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? It was not an attempt to make the Cybertron articles "mine" - it's just that they were going to turn out that way because I happened to write be the one who wrote them. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 17 June 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::I can see how you could feel that way, and I certainly apologise if that's how I've come across, but disrespect was never my intention. It's just that, as Lonegamer says, all 51 other articles were going to look, read and sound a certain way, you know? - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 17 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each ~~series/character~~ for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each sections' write-up for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 17 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		::I think I altered it, didn't I? That's probably because I was doing the ''entire'' Cybertron cartoon at the time, and wanted some consistency in the plot summaries across all 52 articles. The way I tend to write those sorts of things, typically, is as a little sorta-kinda "story" itself, whereas your version was more of a scene-by-scene ("This happens. Then this happens. Then this happens."), in the process doing something I'm really not fond of: a large collection of tiny one- and two-sentence paragraphs, sometimes describing one scene with one sentence and making it once paragraph on its own, sometimes breaking another scene into several paragraphs at no particularly logical points. So, that's probably why I wrote it fresh. Nothin' against ya, just had a project rolling and was looking for consistency. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)		:::I understand that reasoning, but it's profoundly disrespectful to the contributors who have come before you to erase their contribution just so it'll all be in ''your'' style. You don't get to "own" ''Cybertron.'' [[User:JW\|JW]] 17:11, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::It's not that. He's maintaining the flow of style that's used within each series/character for consistency so it doesn't jar readers. And the scene-by-scene style is a bit, well, lackluster. --[[User:Lonegamer78\|Lonegamer78]] 17:15, 17 June 2010 (EDT)