Talk:Space bridge - Revision history

M Sipher: /* Stellar Spanner */

2021-07-06T11:02:55Z

Stellar Spanner

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:02, 6 July 2021
Line 40:		Line 40:
	::::Good points, and I think the ember one is enough to convince me. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:38, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		::::Good points, and I think the ember one is enough to convince me. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:38, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	: I mean there is functionally zero differences between the two concepts besides the name. Hell, I think we gave it the different name because it was the same thing and we felt like ''something'' had to change so why not the name for shits and giggles?		: I mean there is functionally zero differences between the two concepts besides the name. Hell, I think we gave it the different name because it was the same thing and we felt like ''something'' had to change so why not the name for shits and giggles?
	: But while I see no issues with merging, I have to agree that '''''there should be discussion on the actual proper wiki not just on the discord''''' because not everyone has the time or energy or patience to sit on the discord or sift through discord backlog, while wiki changes are very, very easily noticed on the "Recent Changes" page. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 06:39, 6 July 2021 (EDT)		: But while I see no issues with merging, I have to agree that '''''there should be discussion on the actual proper wiki not just on the discord''''' because not everyone has the time or energy or patience to sit on the discord all day or sift through discord backlog, while wiki changes are very, very easily noticed on the "Recent Changes" page. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 06:39, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

M Sipher: /* Stellar Spanner */

2021-07-06T10:39:17Z

Stellar Spanner

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 6 July 2021
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	::::Good points, and I think the ember one is enough to convince me. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:38, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		::::Good points, and I think the ember one is enough to convince me. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:38, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			: I mean there is functionally zero differences between the two concepts besides the name. Hell, I think we gave it the different name because it was the same thing and we felt like ''something'' had to change so why not the name for shits and giggles?
			: But while I see no issues with merging, I have to agree that '''''there should be discussion on the actual proper wiki not just on the discord''''' because not everyone has the time or energy or patience to sit on the discord or sift through discord backlog, while wiki changes are very, very easily noticed on the "Recent Changes" page. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 06:39, 6 July 2021 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Stellar Spanner */

2021-07-05T15:38:50Z

Stellar Spanner

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 5 July 2021
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			::::Good points, and I think the ember one is enough to convince me. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:38, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

Star Spangled Sam at 15:35, 5 July 2021

2021-07-05T15:35:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 5 July 2021
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

The Wadapan at 15:30, 5 July 2021

2021-07-05T15:30:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 5 July 2021
Line 36:		Line 36:
	: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... and this is ''without'' going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... and this is ''without'' going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

Escargon at 13:35, 5 July 2021

2021-07-05T13:35:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 5 July 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:

	: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... and this is ''without'' going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... and this is ''without'' going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

Locoman: /* Stellar Spanner */

2021-07-05T12:40:16Z

Stellar Spanner

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 5 July 2021
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:... which brings me to my second point: I think it's worth keeping it on the main page because it ''does'' represent a significant evolution with the "concept" of space bridges as a whole. If ever we were to expand the current article with a "conceptual history" section (which, for the record, I think would be a worthwhile idea), it ''would'' be important to note that FunPub's crop of 2008-2010 stories were the first bits of media to pick up on how ''Animated'' tied together the concepts of transwarp/unspace and use them in their stories—for reference, see the dialogue in Blitzwing Bop, where Blitzwing describes the device as "transwarp without the starship".		:... which brings me to my second point: I think it's worth keeping it on the main page because it ''does'' represent a significant evolution with the "concept" of space bridges as a whole. If ever we were to expand the current article with a "conceptual history" section (which, for the record, I think would be a worthwhile idea), it ''would'' be important to note that FunPub's crop of 2008-2010 stories were the first bits of media to pick up on how ''Animated'' tied together the concepts of transwarp/unspace and use them in their stories—for reference, see the dialogue in Blitzwing Bop, where Blitzwing describes the device as "transwarp without the starship".

	: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... this ~~isn~~'t going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... and this is ''without'' going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

Locoman: /* Stellar Spanner */

2021-07-05T12:35:28Z

Stellar Spanner

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 5 July 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Bringing this back up, again. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:38, 4 July 2021 (EDT)		Bringing this back up, again. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:38, 4 July 2021 (EDT)

			: So let's maybe approach this from a different angle—rather than ask "why should we merge these two things", let's instead start with the central thesis of "why ''shouldn't'' we merge these two pages"?
			: In its first appearance, the stellar spanner shows up so that the writers can do a riff on the Transport to Oblivion/Bridge To Nowhere plot. In that story, it's very clearly just a differently-colored Sunbow model; the second time it shows up it's straight-up just the Marvel version, no different colors or anything. Adding to this, there's nothing in the comics to suggest that the stellar spanner works on any kind of alternate principle or functions differently from normal space bridge—this isn't something like, say, the [[Agonizing Rehabilitation Chamber]], where there's some kind of deliberate inversion or twist on the stock ''Transformers'' premise to keep with the Shattered Glass theme...

			:... which brings me to my second point: I think it's worth keeping it on the main page because it ''does'' represent a significant evolution with the "concept" of space bridges as a whole. If ever we were to expand the current article with a "conceptual history" section (which, for the record, I think would be a worthwhile idea), it ''would'' be important to note that FunPub's crop of 2008-2010 stories were the first bits of media to pick up on how ''Animated'' tied together the concepts of transwarp/unspace and use them in their stories—for reference, see the dialogue in Blitzwing Bop, where Blitzwing describes the device as "transwarp without the starship".

			: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... this isn't going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Stellar Spanner */

2021-07-05T03:38:16Z

Stellar Spanner

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 5 July 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
	::I'm well aware? The point of the Discord is that it's a springboard for ideas that should be further discussed on the wiki, not for unilateral action. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:13, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		::I'm well aware? The point of the Discord is that it's a springboard for ideas that should be further discussed on the wiki, not for unilateral action. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:13, 9 May 2021 (EDT)

			Bringing this back up, again. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:38, 4 July 2021 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Stellar Spanner */

2021-05-09T19:13:58Z

Stellar Spanner

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 9 May 2021
Line 25:		Line 25:
	I really wish we would have had a discussion about this before we elected to merge. Not everything that is based on the same concepts has to be all on the same page, we're not Wikipedia. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:25, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		I really wish we would have had a discussion about this before we elected to merge. Not everything that is based on the same concepts has to be all on the same page, we're not Wikipedia. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:25, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
	:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
			::I'm well aware? The point of the Discord is that it's a springboard for ideas that should be further discussed on the wiki, not for unilateral action. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:13, 9 May 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 5 July 2021
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			::::Good points, and I think the ember one is enough to convince me. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:38, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 5 July 2021
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			:::I feel like, from the point of view of communicating conceptual history and ties, having them merged is much more useful. Compare and contrast Sparks and Embers: Embers have physiological differences with Sparks that are remarked upon within the setting, and even then that only earns Embers a subheading on the Spark article. If the spanner had, say, been described as functioning differently from normal space bridges, that'd be a different story. [[User:Star Spangled Sam\|Star Spangled Sam]] ([[User talk:Star Spangled Sam\|talk]]) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 5 July 2021
Line 36:		Line 36:
	: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... and this is ''without'' going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		: Finally, I think there's the question of visibility to consider. Which will get more eyeballs on the concept and its contents—by folding it under the large and developed article that covers every permutation of space bridge, or putting it on its own page where it'll continue to languish? And it ''did'' languish—the article was missing information for five years before someone got around to finishing it up. Based on all these points, it seems clear to me that ''both'' pages would benefit from keeping them merged... and this is ''without'' going into the etymological debate about how "stellar spanner" is literally just "space bridge" after being run through a thesaurus. [[User:Grum\|Grum]] ([[User talk:Grum\|talk]]) 08:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
	:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)		:: I think that you're overestimating just how much would be done with these articles being merged; it's a matter of fact that FunPub articles tend to have less work done for them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 July 2021 (EDT)
			::Space bridges is the same. (The visibility point is irrelevant in my eyes, it's just that like you say, the whole joke of the stellar spanner is that it's the same thing using oblique words.) —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 11:30, 5 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 5 July 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
	::I'm well aware? The point of the Discord is that it's a springboard for ideas that should be further discussed on the wiki, not for unilateral action. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:13, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		::I'm well aware? The point of the Discord is that it's a springboard for ideas that should be further discussed on the wiki, not for unilateral action. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:13, 9 May 2021 (EDT)

			Bringing this back up, again. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 23:38, 4 July 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 9 May 2021
Line 25:		Line 25:
	I really wish we would have had a discussion about this before we elected to merge. Not everything that is based on the same concepts has to be all on the same page, we're not Wikipedia. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:25, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		I really wish we would have had a discussion about this before we elected to merge. Not everything that is based on the same concepts has to be all on the same page, we're not Wikipedia. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 11:25, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
	:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)		:Folks had a discussion on Discord. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 15:05, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
			::I'm well aware? The point of the Discord is that it's a springboard for ideas that should be further discussed on the wiki, not for unilateral action. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 15:13, 9 May 2021 (EDT)