Talk:Starscream (Armada) - Revision history

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: /* Merged discussion from "Talk:Starscream (Armada Kre-O)" */ new section

2024-11-02T08:21:05Z

Merged discussion from "Talk:Starscream (Armada Kre-O)": new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 2 November 2024
Line 50:		Line 50:
	:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
	:What the fuck happened to WAITING UNTIL WE HAD ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES? ''Christ'', people, there is absolutely ZERO harm in holding off! --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:59, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		:What the fuck happened to WAITING UNTIL WE HAD ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES? ''Christ'', people, there is absolutely ZERO harm in holding off! --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:59, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

			== Merged discussion from "Talk:Starscream (Armada Kre-O)" ==

			Armada Starscream is [[Starscream (Armada)\|this guy]]. We should not make the wiki needlessly confusing to navigate. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 16:46, 7 May 2014 (EDT)
			:How about <nowiki>[[Ulchtar (Kre-O)]]</nowiki> then? We have [[Ulchtar\|precedent for an Armada Starscream analogue being called that]]. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 20:16, 7 May 2014 (EDT)
			::Eh, I don't think anybody's really going to be searching under that name. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:22, 7 May 2014 (EDT)
			:::Ulchtar would a terrible, terrible thing to call this article. I'm not sure what a good thing to call it would be, but I know that one would be terrible. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:25, 7 May 2014 (EDT)

			There, this little fix-up should make things better (and more consistent). Hope this was of help. [[User:Go(toby070)Bots\|Go(toby070)Bots]] ([[User talk:Go(toby070)Bots\|talk]]) 20:36, 7 May 2014 (EDT)

			:Maybe he's just Kreo Thundercracker, who just changed his look. Huh?--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 13:01, 13 January 2015 (EST)

M Sipher: /* Generations Toy. */

2013-08-20T23:59:56Z

Generations Toy.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 20 August 2013
Line 49:		Line 49:
	Well, now that we know through solicitations that G1 Starscream is getting the Generations body, should we move it to G1 Starscream's page along with moving Generations Thundercracker from WFC Thundercracker's page to the G1 page? (Mind you, I'd loathe doing that, but I'm just asking to see if we have to.) [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 19:21, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		Well, now that we know through solicitations that G1 Starscream is getting the Generations body, should we move it to G1 Starscream's page along with moving Generations Thundercracker from WFC Thundercracker's page to the G1 page? (Mind you, I'd loathe doing that, but I'm just asking to see if we have to.) [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 19:21, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
	:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
			:What the fuck happened to WAITING UNTIL WE HAD ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES? ''Christ'', people, there is absolutely ZERO harm in holding off! --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:59, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

KilMichaelMcC: /* Generations Toy. */

2013-08-20T23:34:42Z

Generations Toy.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 20 August 2013
Line 48:		Line 48:

	Well, now that we know through solicitations that G1 Starscream is getting the Generations body, should we move it to G1 Starscream's page along with moving Generations Thundercracker from WFC Thundercracker's page to the G1 page? (Mind you, I'd loathe doing that, but I'm just asking to see if we have to.) [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 19:21, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		Well, now that we know through solicitations that G1 Starscream is getting the Generations body, should we move it to G1 Starscream's page along with moving Generations Thundercracker from WFC Thundercracker's page to the G1 page? (Mind you, I'd loathe doing that, but I'm just asking to see if we have to.) [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 19:21, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
			:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Generations Toy. */ new section

2013-08-20T23:21:47Z

Generations Toy.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 20 August 2013
Line 44:		Line 44:

	I don't understand the caption under the first picture.[[User:SoundWave\|SoundWave]] 19:19, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		I don't understand the caption under the first picture.[[User:SoundWave\|SoundWave]] 19:19, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

			== Generations Toy. ==

			Well, now that we know through solicitations that G1 Starscream is getting the Generations body, should we move it to G1 Starscream's page along with moving Generations Thundercracker from WFC Thundercracker's page to the G1 page? (Mind you, I'd loathe doing that, but I'm just asking to see if we have to.) [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 19:21, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

SoundWave: /* Caption */

2013-08-20T23:19:27Z

Caption

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 20 August 2013
Line 43:		Line 43:
	==Caption==		==Caption==

	I don't understand the caption under the first picture.		I don't understand the caption under the first picture.[[User:SoundWave\|SoundWave]] 19:19, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

SoundWave at 23:17, 20 August 2013

2013-08-20T23:17:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 20 August 2013
Line 40:		Line 40:
	:He actively joined the Autobots for a brief period of time. He didn't simply ally himself with them - he petitioned to join the faction, and they let him. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:32, 30 September 2011 (EDT)		:He actively joined the Autobots for a brief period of time. He didn't simply ally himself with them - he petitioned to join the faction, and they let him. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:32, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
	::In other words, a perfectly sensible reason that doesn't make SP suddenly a 'Con. Yay! --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:50, 30 September 2011 (EDT)		::In other words, a perfectly sensible reason that doesn't make SP suddenly a 'Con. Yay! --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:50, 30 September 2011 (EDT)

			==Caption==

			I don't understand the caption under the first picture.

Andrusi: /* Autobot? */

2011-09-30T20:50:23Z

Autobot?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 30 September 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Someone cited this article as evidence that [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] should be classified as a Decepticon, which is pretty ridiculous, but it got me wondering. Why ''do'' we have an Autobot symbol here? He isn't an Autobot. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:19, 30 September 2011 (EDT)		Someone cited this article as evidence that [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] should be classified as a Decepticon, which is pretty ridiculous, but it got me wondering. Why ''do'' we have an Autobot symbol here? He isn't an Autobot. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:19, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
	:He actively joined the Autobots for a brief period of time. He didn't simply ally himself with them - he petitioned to join the faction, and they let him. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:32, 30 September 2011 (EDT)		:He actively joined the Autobots for a brief period of time. He didn't simply ally himself with them - he petitioned to join the faction, and they let him. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:32, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
			::In other words, a perfectly sensible reason that doesn't make SP suddenly a 'Con. Yay! --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:50, 30 September 2011 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* Autobot? */

2011-09-30T20:32:16Z

Autobot?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 30 September 2011
Line 38:		Line 38:

	Someone cited this article as evidence that [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] should be classified as a Decepticon, which is pretty ridiculous, but it got me wondering. Why ''do'' we have an Autobot symbol here? He isn't an Autobot. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:19, 30 September 2011 (EDT)		Someone cited this article as evidence that [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] should be classified as a Decepticon, which is pretty ridiculous, but it got me wondering. Why ''do'' we have an Autobot symbol here? He isn't an Autobot. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:19, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
			:He actively joined the Autobots for a brief period of time. He didn't simply ally himself with them - he petitioned to join the faction, and they let him. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:32, 30 September 2011 (EDT)

Andrusi: /* Autobot? */ new section

2011-09-30T20:19:47Z

Autobot?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 30 September 2011
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Worth mentioning that in the Melbourne House PS2 game Starscream is somehow able to use his wing sword despite still visibly having both wings attached. Where did he pull the third wing from? I'd add it in the notes section but i don't seem to be able to. {{unsigned\|Durge}}		Worth mentioning that in the Melbourne House PS2 game Starscream is somehow able to use his wing sword despite still visibly having both wings attached. Where did he pull the third wing from? I'd add it in the notes section but i don't seem to be able to. {{unsigned\|Durge}}
	:That would probably be a better note for the article for the game itself. (An error, maybe) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 18:06, 30 December 2010 (EST)		:That would probably be a better note for the article for the game itself. (An error, maybe) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 18:06, 30 December 2010 (EST)

			== Autobot? ==

			Someone cited this article as evidence that [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] should be classified as a Decepticon, which is pretty ridiculous, but it got me wondering. Why ''do'' we have an Autobot symbol here? He isn't an Autobot. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:19, 30 September 2011 (EDT)

Abates: /* 3 Wings? */

2010-12-30T23:06:21Z

3 Wings?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 30 December 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:
	== 3 Wings? ==		== 3 Wings? ==

	Worth mentioning that in the Melbourne House PS2 game Starscream is somehow able to use his wing sword despite still visibly having both wings attached. Where did he pull the third wing from? I'd add it in the notes section but i don't seem to be able to.		Worth mentioning that in the Melbourne House PS2 game Starscream is somehow able to use his wing sword despite still visibly having both wings attached. Where did he pull the third wing from? I'd add it in the notes section but i don't seem to be able to. {{unsigned\|Durge}}
			:That would probably be a better note for the article for the game itself. (An error, maybe) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 18:06, 30 December 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 2 November 2024
Line 50:		Line 50:
	:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
	:What the fuck happened to WAITING UNTIL WE HAD ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES? ''Christ'', people, there is absolutely ZERO harm in holding off! --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:59, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		:What the fuck happened to WAITING UNTIL WE HAD ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES? ''Christ'', people, there is absolutely ZERO harm in holding off! --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:59, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

			== Merged discussion from "Talk:Starscream (Armada Kre-O)" ==

			Armada Starscream is [[Starscream (Armada)\|this guy]]. We should not make the wiki needlessly confusing to navigate. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 16:46, 7 May 2014 (EDT)
			:How about <nowiki>[[Ulchtar (Kre-O)]]</nowiki> then? We have [[Ulchtar\|precedent for an Armada Starscream analogue being called that]]. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 20:16, 7 May 2014 (EDT)
			::Eh, I don't think anybody's really going to be searching under that name. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 20:22, 7 May 2014 (EDT)
			:::Ulchtar would a terrible, terrible thing to call this article. I'm not sure what a good thing to call it would be, but I know that one would be terrible. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC\|talk]]) 20:25, 7 May 2014 (EDT)

			There, this little fix-up should make things better (and more consistent). Hope this was of help. [[User:Go(toby070)Bots\|Go(toby070)Bots]] ([[User talk:Go(toby070)Bots\|talk]]) 20:36, 7 May 2014 (EDT)

			:Maybe he's just Kreo Thundercracker, who just changed his look. Huh?--[[User:Primestar3\|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3\|talk]]) 13:01, 13 January 2015 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 20 August 2013
Line 49:		Line 49:
	Well, now that we know through solicitations that G1 Starscream is getting the Generations body, should we move it to G1 Starscream's page along with moving Generations Thundercracker from WFC Thundercracker's page to the G1 page? (Mind you, I'd loathe doing that, but I'm just asking to see if we have to.) [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 19:21, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		Well, now that we know through solicitations that G1 Starscream is getting the Generations body, should we move it to G1 Starscream's page along with moving Generations Thundercracker from WFC Thundercracker's page to the G1 page? (Mind you, I'd loathe doing that, but I'm just asking to see if we have to.) [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 19:21, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
	:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)		:We have to see the packaging and bio before we know whether or not it's officially Armada Starscream repurposed in the comic, or officially just a new body for G1 Starscream homaging Armada. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC\|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:34, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
			:What the fuck happened to WAITING UNTIL WE HAD ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES? ''Christ'', people, there is absolutely ZERO harm in holding off! --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 19:59, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 30 September 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Someone cited this article as evidence that [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] should be classified as a Decepticon, which is pretty ridiculous, but it got me wondering. Why ''do'' we have an Autobot symbol here? He isn't an Autobot. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:19, 30 September 2011 (EDT)		Someone cited this article as evidence that [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] should be classified as a Decepticon, which is pretty ridiculous, but it got me wondering. Why ''do'' we have an Autobot symbol here? He isn't an Autobot. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:19, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
	:He actively joined the Autobots for a brief period of time. He didn't simply ally himself with them - he petitioned to join the faction, and they let him. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:32, 30 September 2011 (EDT)		:He actively joined the Autobots for a brief period of time. He didn't simply ally himself with them - he petitioned to join the faction, and they let him. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 16:32, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
			::In other words, a perfectly sensible reason that doesn't make SP suddenly a 'Con. Yay! --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 16:50, 30 September 2011 (EDT)